Community Reviews

Rating(4.2 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
42(42%)
4 stars
31(31%)
3 stars
27(27%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews
July 14,2025
... Show More

While one may not necessarily concur with Penrose's perspectives regarding the ultimate connections between mathematics, physics, and reality, I firmly believe that it is worthwhile to take his views seriously. This book is truly remarkable in that it caters to a wider audience, yet Penrose does not shy away from presenting the mathematical aspects. For a layperson, I envision that a great deal may be lost. However, I found Penrose's explanations surrounding the math to be generally quite good. Of course, they can only go so far.


I thoroughly enjoyed witnessing Penrose's take (in general, not just on spinors and twistors...) on various matters, ranging from basic mathematics to his views on the path of physics in the early 2000s. Penrose is an original thinker, and I highly appreciated the fact that he presented both traditional views and his own, while clearly indicating which ones were more speculative and which ones were more widely accepted within the general community. Given that 20 years have elapsed since the publication of this book, one might assume that the content it covers has become less relevant. In fact, most of it has remained relevant as it provides an overview, and we still have not made significant progress in the interpretations of quantum mechanics or in formulating a quantum-gravity theory. I'm not suggesting that no progress has been made, but it is astonishing how much of what Penrose said still holds true today.


Overall, it is a very interesting read. I did not attempt any of the exercises, but I would推测 that they do enhance the experience to some extent. If you are interested in a unique perspective on math and physics and how they have interacted, I believe it is a stimulating (albeit long) read.

July 14,2025
... Show More
Sir Penrose is widely regarded as one of the greatest living physicists, mathematicians, and scientists.

His book – The Road to Reality – offers a comprehensive exploration of sophisticated physics concepts intertwined with advanced mathematical ideas.

In the preface, the author emphasizes that mathematics should be accessible to all. However, being from a non-mathematical background, I skipped most of the mathematics, including modern physical theory, calculus, Fourier series, hyperfunctions, Riemann surfaces, and complex function theory. Here I am with the review.

Within a third of this book, Sir Penrose has condensed and presented the fundamental and crucial components, which I believe is typical of an undergraduate mathematics course.

The book is rich in core concepts without unnecessary complexity. I skipped most of the mathematical formulas yet was able to grasp the meaning, perhaps because I have been following and reading the works of Brian Greene, Michio Kaku, and Stephen Hawking.

This book is particularly written for readers acquainted with mathematical physics. I'm sure they will enjoy navigating between math and physics.

A crucial masterpiece of this century, I strongly recommend every science enthusiast to read this book.

Reproduced from: The Road to Reality
July 14,2025
... Show More
Oh Thank God I'm done reading this book!

The author's "Road to Reality" is truly a challenging journey. It has numerous hills, hairpin curves, and a plethora of potholes. If you choose to travel this road with him, be prepared for a potentially busted axle!

Whenever I pan a book, I always turn to the reviews of others, especially the bad ones. I want to see what I agreed with, and in this case, I found myself in agreement with most of the bad reviews.

Everyone knows that Dr. Penrose is brilliant. But one has to wonder if he was worried that if this book didn't irritate 99.999999% of the world, we might suspect otherwise. The most common review centered around the question of who Penrose's intended audience was. I'm an engineer with a good deal of useful math knowledge, and yet most of what was mentioned could be narrowed down to a specific subdiscipline of mathematics. There were countless arcane references, and the author, much like Dr. Jekyll, said he hoped those with less math background would join him on this journey. But then Mr. Hyde emerged, and a flurry of prefixed concatenate terminology appeared. Many of these terms were likely constructed specifically for the physics of unification.

In my opinion, there is very little practical use for anyone but a current or former student in the field to read this book. Even they will likely be annoyed by the free flow of concepts. And, no, there is no real teaching here, only references to ideas, perhaps a little at the start. Moreover, there is no English description of the underlying application of the math to the physics in a single section. I think Penrose thought it would be too difficult to describe both the math and the physics in the same section, but referencing past chapters for word usage in the applied area made it useless to me as well.
July 14,2025
... Show More
The parts that I understood, I only understood because I had studied applied math back at my university, and also had a fair share of physics.

However, the things that I didn't understand, such as twistor theory and all that, or string theory which wasn't covered in my university, I simply didn't understand either.

The book claims to be a self-contained resource, but in my opinion, it fails to fulfill this promise.

I highly doubt that this book is accessible at all to someone without a relevant background. But then again, one might wonder why they would need this book in the first place.

Perhaps it could be useful as a reference for those with a deeper understanding, but for the average reader without the necessary knowledge, it seems rather challenging.

It might be beneficial if the authors provided more explanations and background information to make the content more understandable for a wider audience.

Overall, while the book may have some value, its lack of accessibility for those without a relevant background is a significant drawback.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.