Even with the descriptions of underage nipples. Yes, we understand that the author aimed to discuss repressed sexuality, religion, puberty, and self-discovery. But the truth is, it could have been executed much better. Carrie could have explored her sexuality without it coming across as teen pedophilic pornography. She could have been obsessed with other girls' nipples and sexuality without being written in a sensationalist way. Come on, creepy male authors! When will you get it right? I have yet to encounter a King description of a teenage boy's penis that matches the length, adjectives, and sensuality of Carrie's nipples. I sincerely hope I never do, and I hope he discontinues writing such content. Buzz off, creepy old man, with your so-called "wholesome intention" of writing to provide for your family. Do so without leering at children's breasts, thank you very much.
I've been竭尽全力 to like Stephen King. I've attempted to overlook his subpar writing, and it's true that he has the ability to build suspense and pen exciting action scenes that make you flip through the pages without realizing the passage of time. But he fails miserably in most other aspects.
To add insult to injury, in the introduction, he presents the real-life tragedies of women he knew, who were bullied and had difficult and sad lives, as inspiration for Carrie and "tragedy porn" to pique our interest in the story. The dude even claims that he witnessed their bullying but didn't intervene because he was just a 14-year-old lad. Listen, fuckface. If a 14-year-old is deemed incapable of exercising the most basic common sense and compassion due to his young age, then what right do you have to sexualize 16-year-old girls' breasts for 300 pages?
And give me a break. I've actually dealt with bullies even in kindergarten. Stop with the lame excuses.
End of rant.