...
Show More
Salman Rushdie has been publishing novels for 40+ years and now and in addition to that has published two collections of essays and nonfiction. This is one that cover ground from 1992-2002.
There’s a few different kinds of writings in this piece. There’s analysis of writing and politics, and I think this is Rushdie at his very best. He’s a good reader, and he’s good at making his reading clear and focused. So when he analyzes both what is true and interpretive about a novel, but also what is fascinating and interesting about a novel, he’s good at it. He’s also good at doing this with politics. I am at an extreme disadvantage with his piece because I do not have a command of almost any of the Indian facts of these politics. So I have to trust him, and he’s at least apparently trustworthy. When it comes to the literary engagement, I also think he’s trustworthy, but I am more in my wheelhouse here.
The essays are less good when he falls into sentimentality, something that would add charm to his discussion of The Wizard of Oz, but there’s a paltry kind of analysis going on in this first essay that the balance is out of whack, or nonexistent.
The best essay in the whole collection, by far, is the title essay, which is about boundaries and borders (and walls) in an especially otherwise boundaryless state of the world. He’s right to understand that something significant has changed with Sept 11 and reads this significance through the literature of borders. And it’s really fascinating and I think mostly right thinking.
There’s a few different kinds of writings in this piece. There’s analysis of writing and politics, and I think this is Rushdie at his very best. He’s a good reader, and he’s good at making his reading clear and focused. So when he analyzes both what is true and interpretive about a novel, but also what is fascinating and interesting about a novel, he’s good at it. He’s also good at doing this with politics. I am at an extreme disadvantage with his piece because I do not have a command of almost any of the Indian facts of these politics. So I have to trust him, and he’s at least apparently trustworthy. When it comes to the literary engagement, I also think he’s trustworthy, but I am more in my wheelhouse here.
The essays are less good when he falls into sentimentality, something that would add charm to his discussion of The Wizard of Oz, but there’s a paltry kind of analysis going on in this first essay that the balance is out of whack, or nonexistent.
The best essay in the whole collection, by far, is the title essay, which is about boundaries and borders (and walls) in an especially otherwise boundaryless state of the world. He’s right to understand that something significant has changed with Sept 11 and reads this significance through the literature of borders. And it’s really fascinating and I think mostly right thinking.