...
Show More
Where to begin...
The authors, in the prefact to Hunters of Dune, state clearly that they had no intention of copying Frank Herbert's style in the sequel to Chapterhouse. Thank goodness for that. The difference in style is jarring. The Dune story moves from thoughtful, well-written divergences to the haphazard journey from plot point to plot point across two decades.
I'm torn about the resurrection of nearly every major character from previous Dune books as gholas. The original idea came from FH but I don't see the point in introducing a raft of new characters when the book is already filled with them. As for the book as a whole, I would rate it lower, but I want some kind of resolution to the story. I'm willing to plod through this mediocrity to the end. Less patient readers may not wish to do so.
The authors, in the prefact to Hunters of Dune, state clearly that they had no intention of copying Frank Herbert's style in the sequel to Chapterhouse. Thank goodness for that. The difference in style is jarring. The Dune story moves from thoughtful, well-written divergences to the haphazard journey from plot point to plot point across two decades.
I'm torn about the resurrection of nearly every major character from previous Dune books as gholas. The original idea came from FH but I don't see the point in introducing a raft of new characters when the book is already filled with them. As for the book as a whole, I would rate it lower, but I want some kind of resolution to the story. I'm willing to plod through this mediocrity to the end. Less patient readers may not wish to do so.