...
Show More
This is a dated book that includes some solid -- though incomplete -- advice.
David Bach promises that you can become a millionaire simply by making automatic payments to your savings, mortgage and debt. This isn't bad advice, but it is simplistic. He devotes a scant 15 pages to debt, and his advice boils down to "don't charge anything more and pay extra each month." Again, not bad advice, but anyone who has lived paycheck-to-paycheck knows this is easier said than done.
Bach promises you won't need a budget and you won't need discipline to get rich this way. I know from experience that this is not true since in my younger days, I set up all my savings and payments to happen automatically, didn't have a budget and racked up an ungodly amount of bank overdraft fees one year. Trust me, unless you are already rich, you need to be at least a little disciplined with your spending to make this system work.
Other questions, I had when reading this:
*If Jim and Sue McIntyre had done so well financially, why did they need a 20-something to review their retirement plans?
*For that matter, what was a 20-something doing giving out financial advice if the concept of paying yourself first is something he had never considered before?
*What sort of rate of return did the McIntyres have to amass $2 million in net worth over 30 years if their income was only $53,000? I understand the power of compounding interest, but their gains must have been phenomenal.
*If the McIntyres were so central to Bach developing The Automatic Millionaire, why weren't they thanked in the acknowledgements at the end?
I'm not saying the McIntyres are completely fabricated. After all, the copyright page does that pseudonyms are used and some details might be changed. But my impression is that the examples Bach uses are a far stretch from reality. That seemed especially obvious when he talks about a client paying 30% of their money in taxes. He obviously doesn't understand the graduated tax system if he thinks anyone is paying 30% of their income in federal income tax.
My view of the book may be colored by the fact that one of my pet peeves in when an author relates a conversation word-for-word (complete with knowing looks) when it seems unlikely he recorded it. This seems common in financial books when the "aw shucks" everyday man wows the hot shot planner with his common sense money wisdom. I could do without these corny conversations.
So this seems like a really negative review, right? Well, it is and it isn't. Setting up automatic savings and payments is good advice. Some of his suggestions are out-of-date (RIP ING) and his comment about foreclosures didn't age well, but this can still be a good read for those who are just starting out on their journey to financial freedom.
David Bach promises that you can become a millionaire simply by making automatic payments to your savings, mortgage and debt. This isn't bad advice, but it is simplistic. He devotes a scant 15 pages to debt, and his advice boils down to "don't charge anything more and pay extra each month." Again, not bad advice, but anyone who has lived paycheck-to-paycheck knows this is easier said than done.
Bach promises you won't need a budget and you won't need discipline to get rich this way. I know from experience that this is not true since in my younger days, I set up all my savings and payments to happen automatically, didn't have a budget and racked up an ungodly amount of bank overdraft fees one year. Trust me, unless you are already rich, you need to be at least a little disciplined with your spending to make this system work.
Other questions, I had when reading this:
*If Jim and Sue McIntyre had done so well financially, why did they need a 20-something to review their retirement plans?
*For that matter, what was a 20-something doing giving out financial advice if the concept of paying yourself first is something he had never considered before?
*What sort of rate of return did the McIntyres have to amass $2 million in net worth over 30 years if their income was only $53,000? I understand the power of compounding interest, but their gains must have been phenomenal.
*If the McIntyres were so central to Bach developing The Automatic Millionaire, why weren't they thanked in the acknowledgements at the end?
I'm not saying the McIntyres are completely fabricated. After all, the copyright page does that pseudonyms are used and some details might be changed. But my impression is that the examples Bach uses are a far stretch from reality. That seemed especially obvious when he talks about a client paying 30% of their money in taxes. He obviously doesn't understand the graduated tax system if he thinks anyone is paying 30% of their income in federal income tax.
My view of the book may be colored by the fact that one of my pet peeves in when an author relates a conversation word-for-word (complete with knowing looks) when it seems unlikely he recorded it. This seems common in financial books when the "aw shucks" everyday man wows the hot shot planner with his common sense money wisdom. I could do without these corny conversations.
So this seems like a really negative review, right? Well, it is and it isn't. Setting up automatic savings and payments is good advice. Some of his suggestions are out-of-date (RIP ING) and his comment about foreclosures didn't age well, but this can still be a good read for those who are just starting out on their journey to financial freedom.