...
Show More
If I was rating this purely on my childhood joy, it would be five stars. And today it is still for the most part extremely enjoyable to read, except for the fact that in its joyous feminism it accepts colonialism whole-heartedly.
This is a rewrite of the extremely offensive rape-romance The Sheik and in a way that is very satisfying; our heroine, Harry, is kidnapped by the desert king, and then instead of raping her until she develops Stockholm Syndrome and decides she's in love with him, he treats her with respect and honour and she becomes a powerful warrior and they fall into companionate love and by the end she is queen of the country, mother to many children, feted and respected by all. As a child this was immensely satisfying; she has no home and no family and is bored and restless and wants adventure, and then adventure comes and she triumphs over it and wins everything.
And yet, and yet, reading it as an adult, I could not help but shudder a little at the end. I am aware of the notion of the white saviour and have heard this book criticised on that angle, and yes, I see the problems there, but it does not hit me viscerally. What does, though, is how it suggests that the faux-British colonial project happening here is in some way a relationship of potential respect, that all it takes is Harry becoming queen of the subjugated people to open meaningful diplomatic relationships between, that somehow if only the right individual person talks to the colonisers suddenly everything will be okay. Which, as I write it out, is really just another (perhaps more subtle) version of the white saviour -- she does not just save them by being a fated military leader with supernatural fighting skills, but also by being so amazing in all ways that an entire government decides to treat an entire other nation as human beings. I think I would find this distasteful even if she were not an outsider coming in to another culture to save it, because I do not like the Great Man theory in which it is just finding the right 'Good' person and suddenly evil institutions quit being evil. But then, McKinley's colonialism is entirely harmless -- we never see any of the subjugated peoples actually suffering in any way, it is all charming and amusing and look, we get oranges every day!
I am sad, because I loved it so much as a child, but I am not sure I will be able to read it again.
This is a rewrite of the extremely offensive rape-romance The Sheik and in a way that is very satisfying; our heroine, Harry, is kidnapped by the desert king, and then instead of raping her until she develops Stockholm Syndrome and decides she's in love with him, he treats her with respect and honour and she becomes a powerful warrior and they fall into companionate love and by the end she is queen of the country, mother to many children, feted and respected by all. As a child this was immensely satisfying; she has no home and no family and is bored and restless and wants adventure, and then adventure comes and she triumphs over it and wins everything.
And yet, and yet, reading it as an adult, I could not help but shudder a little at the end. I am aware of the notion of the white saviour and have heard this book criticised on that angle, and yes, I see the problems there, but it does not hit me viscerally. What does, though, is how it suggests that the faux-British colonial project happening here is in some way a relationship of potential respect, that all it takes is Harry becoming queen of the subjugated people to open meaningful diplomatic relationships between, that somehow if only the right individual person talks to the colonisers suddenly everything will be okay. Which, as I write it out, is really just another (perhaps more subtle) version of the white saviour -- she does not just save them by being a fated military leader with supernatural fighting skills, but also by being so amazing in all ways that an entire government decides to treat an entire other nation as human beings. I think I would find this distasteful even if she were not an outsider coming in to another culture to save it, because I do not like the Great Man theory in which it is just finding the right 'Good' person and suddenly evil institutions quit being evil. But then, McKinley's colonialism is entirely harmless -- we never see any of the subjugated peoples actually suffering in any way, it is all charming and amusing and look, we get oranges every day!
I am sad, because I loved it so much as a child, but I am not sure I will be able to read it again.