...
Show More
It's difficult to know what to say about this book, and I can't decide whether I enjoyed it or not.
I think if you're considering reading this, you need to be aware that rape is a major theme. It might be a spoiler, but no one should stumble upon that by accident so I'm leaving it out here for all to see. Deerskin is essentially a story of a neglected girl who's raped by her father, and her lengthy, challenging, journey to get to a place where she can live her life outside the shadow of that trauma.
I think McKinley tackles the subject of rape very well. The event itself is blurry, obscured, but I still found myself deeply disturbed by it, horrified for Lissar, hating the father. This wasn't "rape porn", as we're so often seeing on tv today, and it wasn't a random inconsequential event to "increase tension" (I'm looking at you, tv's Game of Thrones). It was the story, and I think it's important that we have stories like this, which explore horrible things without glorifying them or dismissing them as trivial.
Lissar's subsequent traumatised state hovered between realism and fairy tale. It's difficult to say this is an accurate portrayal of healing after such a violent act, but it's believable. Lissar blocks the memory out so powerfully that she forgets who she is. The sequence as she forgets was incredibly powerful and one of the best pieces of writing I've see. As the reader, I knew what she was forgetting at all times, but it never felt unbelievable: it felt like a young woman shying away from horror.
Beyond the early, raw, reality, this story is a fairy tale. It has random "a wizard did it"-style explanations that can often be jarring, confusing, or irritating. As a child I just accepted that oh, a magic beanstalk grew overnight, but as an adult it's harder to swallow. If you're not willing to utterly suspend your disbelief and accept whatever magical explanations come your way, you definitely won't like this book. For me, I struggled through it, but it's largely what makes me ambivalent about the story.
I feel like Moonwoman undermines the value of Lissar's story somewhat. She doesn't get through the rape by her own strength, she's gifted with lying on a hillside completely senseless for four years? I still don't get it. It made it feel like a cheap excuse to send Lissar off to fall in love with Ossin, without writing (or figuring out how it would be possible) living in the cabin for years, something that would stop readers from going 'but she was only just traumatically raped, how could she fall in love now?'
That said, I did enjoy the Moonwoman myth, just not the way it conveniently melded with Lissar to shift her in and out of camouflage and give her places her to stay when she needed it.
The characters outside Lissar had that fairy-tale quality to them as well. They were never really fully fleshed out. This usually irritates me a lot, but Lissar is very self-focused for obvious reasons so I was ok with it, but definitely felt the lack of a cast of fun characters.
The final weakness of this story was the writing. I've read a fair amount of McKinley, but many years ago when I wasn't as experienced a writer. Now ... well, the writing kind of drove me up the wall. McKinley uses SO MANY complex sentences. They have semi-colons, multiple commas, interjections, jumps back and forth between subjects and I just ... seriously struggled at times to understand what the heck was going on. I've already returned it to the library, otherwise I'd type up a paragraph to show you, but for now, here, I'll try to write something that's sort of, maybe, in the kind of complexity because it's overwhelming, the complexity, and the sentences might be entire paragraphs, and they seemed endless, and now I'm going to jump back to the library because she did that a lot but I don't have a reason to jump back to the library.
The sentences were all grammatically correct, but seriously there was so many asides and jumping back and forth that I had to read a lot of them several times before I could grasp the overall gist of it. It reminded me of Dickens somewhat. I'm all for the occasional use of complex sentences, and I think modern fiction tends to stray too far away from them, but daaaaaaamn. It really got in the way of the story.
The positives of this are mostly dog-related. I don't really like dogs and haven't spent much time around them, but Lissar is a Dog Person, and it changes her life, and you can feel that. Reading the antics of the dogs was fun, and certain turns of phrase perfectly captured their movements.
I still don't know what star rating to give this book. Usually I talk myself into one as I'm reviewing it, but I still feel lost. I guess I'll just sum up. This book is traumatic. It's hopeful. It's unrealistic. It's predictable. It's mystical. It's very, very doggy. If those things appeal to you, maybe you'll love this book.
I think if you're considering reading this, you need to be aware that rape is a major theme. It might be a spoiler, but no one should stumble upon that by accident so I'm leaving it out here for all to see. Deerskin is essentially a story of a neglected girl who's raped by her father, and her lengthy, challenging, journey to get to a place where she can live her life outside the shadow of that trauma.
I think McKinley tackles the subject of rape very well. The event itself is blurry, obscured, but I still found myself deeply disturbed by it, horrified for Lissar, hating the father. This wasn't "rape porn", as we're so often seeing on tv today, and it wasn't a random inconsequential event to "increase tension" (I'm looking at you, tv's Game of Thrones). It was the story, and I think it's important that we have stories like this, which explore horrible things without glorifying them or dismissing them as trivial.
Lissar's subsequent traumatised state hovered between realism and fairy tale. It's difficult to say this is an accurate portrayal of healing after such a violent act, but it's believable. Lissar blocks the memory out so powerfully that she forgets who she is. The sequence as she forgets was incredibly powerful and one of the best pieces of writing I've see. As the reader, I knew what she was forgetting at all times, but it never felt unbelievable: it felt like a young woman shying away from horror.
Beyond the early, raw, reality, this story is a fairy tale. It has random "a wizard did it"-style explanations that can often be jarring, confusing, or irritating. As a child I just accepted that oh, a magic beanstalk grew overnight, but as an adult it's harder to swallow. If you're not willing to utterly suspend your disbelief and accept whatever magical explanations come your way, you definitely won't like this book. For me, I struggled through it, but it's largely what makes me ambivalent about the story.
I feel like Moonwoman undermines the value of Lissar's story somewhat. She doesn't get through the rape by her own strength, she's gifted with lying on a hillside completely senseless for four years? I still don't get it. It made it feel like a cheap excuse to send Lissar off to fall in love with Ossin, without writing (or figuring out how it would be possible) living in the cabin for years, something that would stop readers from going 'but she was only just traumatically raped, how could she fall in love now?'
That said, I did enjoy the Moonwoman myth, just not the way it conveniently melded with Lissar to shift her in and out of camouflage and give her places her to stay when she needed it.
The characters outside Lissar had that fairy-tale quality to them as well. They were never really fully fleshed out. This usually irritates me a lot, but Lissar is very self-focused for obvious reasons so I was ok with it, but definitely felt the lack of a cast of fun characters.
The final weakness of this story was the writing. I've read a fair amount of McKinley, but many years ago when I wasn't as experienced a writer. Now ... well, the writing kind of drove me up the wall. McKinley uses SO MANY complex sentences. They have semi-colons, multiple commas, interjections, jumps back and forth between subjects and I just ... seriously struggled at times to understand what the heck was going on. I've already returned it to the library, otherwise I'd type up a paragraph to show you, but for now, here, I'll try to write something that's sort of, maybe, in the kind of complexity because it's overwhelming, the complexity, and the sentences might be entire paragraphs, and they seemed endless, and now I'm going to jump back to the library because she did that a lot but I don't have a reason to jump back to the library.
The sentences were all grammatically correct, but seriously there was so many asides and jumping back and forth that I had to read a lot of them several times before I could grasp the overall gist of it. It reminded me of Dickens somewhat. I'm all for the occasional use of complex sentences, and I think modern fiction tends to stray too far away from them, but daaaaaaamn. It really got in the way of the story.
The positives of this are mostly dog-related. I don't really like dogs and haven't spent much time around them, but Lissar is a Dog Person, and it changes her life, and you can feel that. Reading the antics of the dogs was fun, and certain turns of phrase perfectly captured their movements.
I still don't know what star rating to give this book. Usually I talk myself into one as I'm reviewing it, but I still feel lost. I guess I'll just sum up. This book is traumatic. It's hopeful. It's unrealistic. It's predictable. It's mystical. It's very, very doggy. If those things appeal to you, maybe you'll love this book.