...
Show More
This is an iconic book and I read it over and over again when I was younger, so this certainly counted as a nostalgic read for me! I was able to view it with fresh eyes and overall, I did generally like what I read, although it's hardly a slam-dunk, knocked-it-out-of-the-park work of literature. It's certainly Jacques through and through--his voice is unique and very easy to pick up on from the Redwall series. His dialogue is on point, even though he really only knows how to write it in one specific style. His character descriptions are alright, if a bit repetitive; although I was amused to see how "animalistic" they were (characters described as "weaselly" or "catlike")--again, perhaps a nod to his more famous works in Redwall. I'd classify this series as squarely MG for its relatively simple characterization and plot, as well as for its shorter length. Feels a bit overdramatic in some places, a bit melancholy in others. Perhaps a bit underwhelming on the whole, which lines up perfectly with my former opinions on this series--there are just too many tropes that I'm not a huge fan of. To my recollection, however, the next book in the series was my favorite, so I'll just keep plugging along and see what difference a revisit might make in my opinion there as well.