...
Show More
Honestly, I think the Companion is a little bit embarrassing. There are also times when I disagree with Whalen's interpretation of events (within the text, that is)--which is fine, we know from group reads that we all read the text differently at times--but Whalen puts it forward as the only way to read it.
Back when the Companion was only a rumored future-project we were all excited, and it was exciting to find out some "what really happened" stuff when it first came out, but now I realize how much more interesting it is just to read the books, as-is. The editing is REALLY bad, and I found that once I got over the feeling of "it's so interesting to know what happened to people!", there wasn't much left of interest. There's an inordinate amount of text on things I couldn't care less about (not that I remember any examples, really... the houses of minor characters, stuff like that) and some interesting things that go unexplored. I would be more interested in a thoughtful analysis of the books, with SOME "what's real/what's not", than what's practically a laundry list of "really were" and "really did".
Back when the Companion was only a rumored future-project we were all excited, and it was exciting to find out some "what really happened" stuff when it first came out, but now I realize how much more interesting it is just to read the books, as-is. The editing is REALLY bad, and I found that once I got over the feeling of "it's so interesting to know what happened to people!", there wasn't much left of interest. There's an inordinate amount of text on things I couldn't care less about (not that I remember any examples, really... the houses of minor characters, stuff like that) and some interesting things that go unexplored. I would be more interested in a thoughtful analysis of the books, with SOME "what's real/what's not", than what's practically a laundry list of "really were" and "really did".