...
Show More
Just peeked at the Wikipedia article on this book, and it says the author wrote it in six weeks, fueled by speed, and was so unhappy with the result he wanted to publish under a pseudonym. But nobody agreed with him, and it was well received. I think it's brilliant. He called it "an entertainment," and it certainly did keep me engaged, but I'd give it much more credit than that. Apparently the NYT reviewer called it a "tour de force" and I would agree.
The plot and action are insane, so I can believe that the author was dissatisfied with it. Yet at the same time, the plot and action are insane in the way the world was (and is) insane, so even though it's one preposterous thing after another, it all works in a way that makes it feel absolutely true. Some of it is funny, which is another element that makes it seem true to life's absurdity. How can a thing be funny and tragic at the same time, and yet, there it is. Maybe that's why I liked it so much.
p.s. The protagonist's voice is the great strength of this book, and his commitment to doing the right thing even when his cause seems lost is powerfully contrasted with all the ugliness involved in trying to carry out his mission. So worth reading!
The plot and action are insane, so I can believe that the author was dissatisfied with it. Yet at the same time, the plot and action are insane in the way the world was (and is) insane, so even though it's one preposterous thing after another, it all works in a way that makes it feel absolutely true. Some of it is funny, which is another element that makes it seem true to life's absurdity. How can a thing be funny and tragic at the same time, and yet, there it is. Maybe that's why I liked it so much.
p.s. The protagonist's voice is the great strength of this book, and his commitment to doing the right thing even when his cause seems lost is powerfully contrasted with all the ugliness involved in trying to carry out his mission. So worth reading!