...
Show More
The author uses problematic descriptors of minoritized groups, and while it is hard to tell if this is his chosen language or merely his conveyance of the Pranksters' chosen language, it's problematic and uncomfortable nevertheless. White, heterosexual, cis men are at the forefront of this book and seemingly this historical moment. These men are generally difficult to like. I did appreciate some of the symbolism and patterns, which I would not have recognized had this book not been for a class. Who knew nonfiction could have symbolism? I also appreciated how the writing tone varied, and always fit the tone of the scene very well. That was impressive on Wolfe's part. I can't agree with Wolfe or this book as a revolutionary moment in journalism/writing, but maybe if I had read it at the time of publication I would? But it didn't totally suck. 2.5 stars.