...
Show More
Well, I liked it, not as much as "Paris to the Moon" but I am having a hard time saying why. Maybe Paris seems exotic to me so a NYC writer's essays on life in Paris are fascinating whereas, since I lived in NYC, essays on life in NYC seem less interesting. Also, I had a really hard time with the essay on Gopnik's therapy - I lost a little respect for him, and that is not good when the reader is expected to credit the writer with insight sufficient to merit attention to his essays. If you don't have a lot of respect for the writer, can you care whar he has to say on a particular topic? Fortunately, Gopnik redeemed himself with the Purim story essay which I loved, so I was back in his corner, but the book zigged and zagged in a way that Paris to the Moon did not.
I know this review is a bit fuzzy. I suppose the outcome is that I would definately read Gopnik's next book so that either means I did not dislike this book all that much, or I am a hopeless optimist!
I know this review is a bit fuzzy. I suppose the outcome is that I would definately read Gopnik's next book so that either means I did not dislike this book all that much, or I am a hopeless optimist!