...
Show More
The Mamas and the Papas! Three and a half stars.
This was a really fascinating story and for the most part very well told. Sykes' descriptions of the geologic upheavals and the great moving ice sheets that shaped 'The Isles' (Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England) were thrilling.
He paints a magnificent picture of the tiny bands of pioneer humans who braved tundra and seas to migrate from Iberia, the first around 10,000 years ago in the Paleolithic era. They were followed by a second small group of sea faring people who had some agricultural skills and had been in Iberia since Neolithic times. This second group joined the pioneers as the ice receded and apparently coexisted fairly peacefully. Sykes makes a very strong case that the genetic bedrock of all of the Isles, including England, was firmly established some 6,000 years ago by these two related peoples and, at least on the maternal side, is solidly ancient Celtic.
The most genetically significant exception is the maternal ancestry of Orkney and Shetland, where a large settlement of Viking women from Norway were the ancestral mothers of as much as 30-40% of the current population.
The second exception to the Celtic mother-lineage is in eastern and northern England where a group of women of Germanic-Scandinavian heritage helped people about 5-10% of the region. Sykes demonstrates that it is very difficult to distinguish between Saxons, Danes and Normans on a genetic basis, but based on location, he thinks these women were Viking Danes.
That devilish Y chromosome is another story altogether. Here, Sykes reaches back into Celtic, Viking and Saxon legends of feuding clans and conquest to trace the patrilineal history of the Isles. Remarkably, a great many of the men of the Isles carry the Celtic Y-chromosomes of a mere handful of reproductively successful men and their sons like the Macdonalds and Macleods in Scotland and the Ui Neills in Ireland. Pockets of Saxon/Danish Y-chromosomes paired with Celtic maternal mitochondria hint at 'male-driven settlement' with some signs of a partial displacement of the indigenous Celtic men. Yet only in East Anglia does the proportion of Saxon/Dane Y-chromosomes reach 20%. Sykes estimates the contribution of Norman males at an amazingly low 2% (genetically, the Normans seem to have been Vikings who absorbed the indigenous language of the time). The Isles, including England, are deeply rooted in a genetically Celtic past.
I loved the tour of the Isles pre and ancient history and Sykes' conclusions are a sobering reminder that many of the world's worst feuds are family feuds.
On the negative side, I could have lived without the dumbed-down genetics and molecular biology lessons. I do understand that Sykes was trying to humanize the science by giving made-up clan names to various Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA sequences rather than using the now standard letter and number designation, but he just made it frustratingly difficult for serious family genealogists like myself to figure out how their own DNA fits into the story.
This was a really fascinating story and for the most part very well told. Sykes' descriptions of the geologic upheavals and the great moving ice sheets that shaped 'The Isles' (Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England) were thrilling.
He paints a magnificent picture of the tiny bands of pioneer humans who braved tundra and seas to migrate from Iberia, the first around 10,000 years ago in the Paleolithic era. They were followed by a second small group of sea faring people who had some agricultural skills and had been in Iberia since Neolithic times. This second group joined the pioneers as the ice receded and apparently coexisted fairly peacefully. Sykes makes a very strong case that the genetic bedrock of all of the Isles, including England, was firmly established some 6,000 years ago by these two related peoples and, at least on the maternal side, is solidly ancient Celtic.
The most genetically significant exception is the maternal ancestry of Orkney and Shetland, where a large settlement of Viking women from Norway were the ancestral mothers of as much as 30-40% of the current population.
The second exception to the Celtic mother-lineage is in eastern and northern England where a group of women of Germanic-Scandinavian heritage helped people about 5-10% of the region. Sykes demonstrates that it is very difficult to distinguish between Saxons, Danes and Normans on a genetic basis, but based on location, he thinks these women were Viking Danes.
That devilish Y chromosome is another story altogether. Here, Sykes reaches back into Celtic, Viking and Saxon legends of feuding clans and conquest to trace the patrilineal history of the Isles. Remarkably, a great many of the men of the Isles carry the Celtic Y-chromosomes of a mere handful of reproductively successful men and their sons like the Macdonalds and Macleods in Scotland and the Ui Neills in Ireland. Pockets of Saxon/Danish Y-chromosomes paired with Celtic maternal mitochondria hint at 'male-driven settlement' with some signs of a partial displacement of the indigenous Celtic men. Yet only in East Anglia does the proportion of Saxon/Dane Y-chromosomes reach 20%. Sykes estimates the contribution of Norman males at an amazingly low 2% (genetically, the Normans seem to have been Vikings who absorbed the indigenous language of the time). The Isles, including England, are deeply rooted in a genetically Celtic past.
I loved the tour of the Isles pre and ancient history and Sykes' conclusions are a sobering reminder that many of the world's worst feuds are family feuds.
On the negative side, I could have lived without the dumbed-down genetics and molecular biology lessons. I do understand that Sykes was trying to humanize the science by giving made-up clan names to various Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA sequences rather than using the now standard letter and number designation, but he just made it frustratingly difficult for serious family genealogists like myself to figure out how their own DNA fits into the story.