Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
32(32%)
4 stars
39(39%)
3 stars
28(28%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
“Was everyone else really as alive as she was? For example, did her sister really matter to herself, was she as valuable to herself as Briony was? If the answer was yes then the world was unbearably complicated, with over two billion voices, everyone's thoughts of equal importance and everyone's claim on life as intense, everyone thinking they were unique, when no one was. One could drown in irrelevance. But if the answer was no then Briony was surrounded by machines, intelligent and pleasant enough on the outside, but lacking the bright and private inside feeling she had. This was sinister and lonely, as well as unlikely. Though it offended her sense of order, she knew it was overwhelmingly probable that everyone else had thoughts like hers. She knew this in an arid way but didn't feel it.”

“The age of clear answers was over. So was the age of characters and plots. She no longer really believed in characters. They were quaint devices that belonged to the nineteenth century. The very concept of character was founded on errors that modern psychology had exposed. Plots too were like rusted machinery whose wheels would no longer turn. A modern novelist could no more write about characters and plots than a modern composer could write a Mozart symphony. It was thought, perception, sensations that interested her, the conscious mind as a river through time. She had read Virginia Woolf and thought that a great transformation was being was being worked in human nature itself, and that only a new kind of fiction could capture the essence of the change.”

************
‘Atonement’ by Ian McEwan was shortlisted for the 2001 Booker and James Tait Prizes. McEwan had previously won the 1998 Booker for ‘Amsterdam’ and was awarded the Jerusalem Prize in 2011. It is set during three time periods, pre-WWII, WWII and post-WWII, during the time it was written. Made into a movie, it was nominated for seven American Academy Awards and fourteen British Academy Awards where it won Best Picture. It’s a coming of age story of a girl into a woman. The author can’t convincingly write from a female perspective so he uses a third person narrative with universal themes.

Briony Tallis is a precocious though not fully mature girl of thirteen, and a writer dotingly encouraged by her mother Emily. She has a much older brother Leon who lives in London. Her older sister Cecilia graduated from Cambridge and is training to be a nurse in a London hospital. She is effectively an only child who grows up in the 1935 English countryside, ensconced within a world of carefully curated fantasy, commanding the undivided attention of her mother while she weaves her narrative spell. Her cousins closer in age to her are coming to visit, asked to act in a play she is staging for the library.

The nine year old twins Pierrot and Jackson and their fifteen year old sister Lola arrive after a two hundred mile journey from the north. Briony is oblivious that they have been sent to escape the divorce of their parents, may stay indefinitely and aren’t in the least bit interested in acting. They agree to perform but demand to pick their own roles. Lola chooses Arabella, the melancholy beauty that Briony had created for herself. Deflated she retires to her room to sulk in self pity. Lola takes over directing and Briona realizes that she has never before been confronted with adversity during the course of her life.

Briony spies Cecilia from the windows of the estate with the half-adopted caretaker Robbie, and she imagines he is proposing to her. She thinks it her duty to end the affair, as she felt compelled to save Leon from a string of unworthy girfriends. She observes Cecilia removing her clothes, not realizing it is to retrieve a vase that Robbie carelessly broke in the fountain. Leon arrives from the city with his friend Paul as Cecilia wonders if he could be the man she marries. Suddenly in love Robbie writes a salacious letter of apology and sends it to her by mistake. He is attending dinner with the family later that night.

Asked to deliver the letter Briony opens it and is convinced that she needs to rescue her older sister from Robbie, while Cecilia is more offended by her invasion of privacy than its contents. The story is told from various points of view. What seemed to be a sexual assault to Briony was a consensual act. Its consummation resembles the soft core erotica found in romance novels, sprawling across pages before interrupted by Briony. The twins run away and during the search Briony sees Lola being raped and blames Robbie. In the dark they weren’t able to see who the antagonist was but he’s arrested and tried on her accusation.

Part II opens during wartime in 1940 with Robbie leading soldiers across the French countryside on his way to Dunkirk and across the Channel to Cecilia. She had studied nursing in London while he spent five years in prison and army basic training. The pace picks up halfway through the book during the action, with its Messerschmitt fighters and machine gun nests. Robbie has hopes of returning to England, clearing his name and marrying Cecilia, but hasn’t forgiven Briony who is now willing to retract her testimony. He muses that it was done out of jealousy for Cecilia as screaming Stuka bombers attack the roadside.

On the beach twenty thousand wounded and exhausted men await evacuation. An RAF man is lynched by infantry troops over lack of air support against the Luftwaffe. During the brutality of war Robbie begins to doubt his and Cecilia’s love, haunted by memories of what he’s seen, as the boats arrive from England. In Part III Briony is working at the hospital where Cecilia had served. Training as a nurse, her childhood pretensions challenged in the military environment and her intentions to follow Cecilia’s study of literature at Cambridge vanish with dreams of becoming a writer. She is rejected by publishers and her sister.

The publishers critique reflects McEwan’s personal criticism of ‘Atonement’. Briony treats the wounded arriving from France and she hopes to find forgiveness from Robbie and Cecilia. She has an urge to speak out at Lola’s wedding to Paul, the only two others who know the secret of the assault. Visiting Cecilia after years of their estrangement, there is a tense encounter with Robbie which ends unresolved. The story continues in 1999 London with Briony as an aging writer losing her memory still at work on her memoirs, the basis of the novel that the reader is reading, suggesting a confluence of fact and fiction.

The book isn’t based on McEwan’s own experiences, its main characters animated inventions divided into three parts of exposition, conflict and resolution. As it is written in his exquisite but laborious prose enthusiasts of McEwan may admire the passages of meta-fictional musings, dwelling upon Briony’s literary vision and creative process, likely those of McEwan himself. The first hundred pages of this book are painfully drawn out but afterwards the action mounts considerably. The passage of time alters people’s perceptions and McEwan employs stream of consciousness writing to reveal their thoughts.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Aunque me ha dejado emocionalmente devastada (y eso que ya iba advertida, pues la película de 2007 protagonizada por Keira Knightley, Saoirse Ronan y James McAvoy me fascina), esta novela me ha MARAVILLADO.
La magnífica prosa de Ian McEwan, tan preciosista, llena de lirismo, la estructura narrativa de la novela, la habilidad en el cambio de perspectivas y, sobre todo, la magnífica construcción de los personajes han hecho que la lectura de cada página haya sido una auténtica delicia para mí.
Es una novela que he degustado lentamente, me he recreado en ella, me he dejado llevar por la propuesta de McEwan... y me ha conquistado. Hasta tal punto, en que tenía que interrumpir a veces la lectura, porque empatizaba tanto con Cecilia y Robbie, que sufría mucho (porque sabía lo que se avecinaba, he ahí el principal handicap de conocer la trama a la perfección), y necesitaba parar.
Me quito también el sombrero ante la construcción y evolución del personaje de Briony (a la que yo tengo bautizada desde la película como "la p*** niña de Expiación"), a la que seguiré odiando sin reservas, pero no por ello dejaré de reconocer que es un grandísimo personaje.
Y Lola y Marshall al infierno de cabeza, por favor.
Y ya, por último, la última gran genialidad de Ian McEwan con el giro final de la breve cuarta parte (o epílogo), que no por menos sabido por mí me ha resultado menos devastador, sorprendente y bien hilado.
Desde el punto de vista emocional, la romántica empedernida que hay en mí) hubiera preferido que acabara en la página 410 (de mi edición... es decir, el final de la tercera parte), pero literariamente reconozco que las siguientes 25 páginas la convierten en una novela perfecta, redonda; muy especialmente la última página que es donde "te estalla la cabeza" (y se pone en marcha el grifo lacrimógeno... sniff).
Ese título... qué bien puesto está ese título, con ese doble encaje perfecto: tanto con el "final" de la tercera parte, donde crees, inocente de ti, que ya entiendes por qué se titula así, como con el final "definitivo", donde la dimensión de sus matices es, sencillamente, perfecta.
Puedo entender que a otras personas no les despierte tanta pasión, pero desde luego a mí esta novela no podría gustarme más
April 17,2025
... Show More
"Atonement" focuses on tragic events surrounding the Tallis family during the years prior to, during and after the Second World War. Briony Tallis, a thirteen-year-old girl who has a dream of becoming a famous author, witnesses and misunderstands the sexual tension between her older sister Cecilia and the gardener Robbie Turner, with her mistake leading to years of remorse, hate, solitude – and atonement. One might think this is a concept too unpromising for a full-length story, lacking any further potential for an interesting reading experience which will stick in one’s memory. But whoever may bear such thoughts: the novel is even more than that. Don’t expect a hopeful, romantic or even funny story when entering the world Ian McEwan has built in his masterpiece. It is tragic, heart-breaking and full of dark moments. There is not too much hope in this story. „Atonement“ depicts what might very well have been reality. McEwan deals with flawed characters. Neither of them are perfect, all of them commit mistakes with grave consequences. Most of them are not even likeable. But you can’t say any person included in McEwans large cast of characters is depicted in an unrealistic way, and in my opinion, that’s what makes „Atonement“ a true masterpiece.

Two years ago, I had to read „The Innocent“, one of McEwan’s less-known novels, for school. It was not particularly well-written, felt really weird to me and a lot of others, did not deal subtly with its messages, and was generally no novel to be commemorated as a great work. I am still angry with my English teacher for introducing me to McEwan with such a book, considering his writing talents shine so much more through the narrative of „Atonement“. Say what you want about the plot or the character development, but the prose is beautiful. The book has been published only fourteen years ago, but it is one of those novels which will probably be considered to be true classics in fifty or one hundred years.

„Atonement“ is divided into three different sections. The first one deals with a hot afternoon in the summer of 1935 and the aftermath of a fatal entanglement, introducing the main characters, a stunning atmosphere and allowing the reader to become familiar with McEwan’s writing style. It was a little bit difficult to get into the story due to its slow beginning and the lengthy introduction, which is the main reason for why I deducted one half-star from my rating and finally rounded it down to 4 stars. But as soon as the first plot twist appeared, the story’s pace gathered speed, making up for a great conclusion to the first part. The second section then introduced us to a soldier’s experience during the Second World War, and while interesting and very well-written, this section – once again – may be considered to be a little long-winded. (I think those 100 pages might easily have been reduced to 60 or 70.) And then McEwan returned to his main protagonist during the course of the last section, narrating a tale about a nurse’s difficult life during War, and had he not already captured me with his prose, he would certainly have succeeded to do so with this final part. The epilogue was one of the best conclusions to a story I’ve ever read, staying true to the plot and the characters and completing the story in a way which is very close to being perfect.

If you enjoy reading novels with magnificent writing, profound plot elements which remain true to the characters, and perfect character development, then this is the book you should check out next.
April 17,2025
... Show More
What a remarkable reading experience! Initially you find your self in a duplicate of Jane Austen's Mansfield Park, then the general atmosphere reflects that of the Brontë's (especially Jane Eyre) and the writing style that of Virginia Woolf (with the continuous registration of impressions), ... perhaps not coincidentally all British, female authors. The story is situated in the middle of the 1930s, in an environment of wealthy British bourgeoisie. The pace is slow, and there is a heavy emphasis on the different perceptions of the protagonists, and that also is not a coincidence. Then a dramatic development follows, described from different perspectives.

"End of story", you think, but nothing is less true. We jump to May 1940 and are served a rather hallucinatory episode of the Second World War: the chaotic withdrawal of British troops at Dunkirk, through the eyes of one of the protagonists of the first part; for me this is one of the most poignant descriptions of the horrors of war I have ever read. Then, the focus moves forwards to London in July 1940 (just before the Blitzkrieg) and the storylines from the previous parts come together in an ultimate final. Here, McEwan gives us proof of his lucid psychological discernment, with some very intense, beautifully composed scenes that will linger along in my memory for a very long time. Only the epilogue, more than 50 years later, seemed superfluous; in this section McEwan - in the best postmodern tradition - deepens the meta-narrative of his novel about the process of writing and the extraordinary power of the writer; interesting stuff, but I wasn't thrilled.

In my view this book shows McEwan at the height of his creative power, and he approaches the maximum a writer of prose can reach in literary expression. Weighty words, I know, but there is a downside to this: this novel is so polished that I finally had a bit of difficulty to really connect with the characters and the story. Originally I gave this a rating of 3 stars, but I've upgraded it to 4, detracting a half one (what a troublesome thing this rating system is!).
April 17,2025
... Show More
A beautifully written and cleverly told story of relationships, growing up, guilt and, obviously, atonement and forgiveness. The essence of the story is how a childish mistake, made in good faith (more or less) can have consequences for many people, for many years.

Although it would be better to read this before watching the film, I’d heard that the book had been thought unfilmable and so was pretty different, which ensured I was alert to reading it with fresh eyes.

Part 1 is perhaps not quite as idyllic as in the film, but still presents a sharp contrast to the scenes in wartorn France that follow, where lovable Robbie is only referred to with detachment by his surname. Although powerfully described, I think the war section is a little too long, but it's a small quibble.

What McEwan does so well in this is the way he explains the inner thoughts and conflicts of his different characters, especially Briony, both as a naive and self-centred teenager, and as a selfless and guilt-ridden adult.

April 17,2025
... Show More
دوستانِ گرانقدر، رمانِ «تاوان»، داستانِ تلخِ حسادت هایِ کودکانه، شهادتِ دروغ و بازی با آینده و زندگیِ دیگران است... داستان در سال های بینِ 1930 تا 1940 در انگلستان رخ میدهد.. توصیفات از طبیعت و در و دیوار و جنگ جهانی و کشته شدگان و بیمارستان و هرآنچه که سخن گفتن از آن در داستان نیاز نمیباشد، به اندازه ای خسته کننده و کسالت آور است که ممکن است هرآن خواندنِ کتاب را رها کنید....... بگذریم... در هر حال، خانوادۀ ثروتمندِ «تالیس» دو دختر به نام «سیسیلیا» و «براینی» و یک پسر به نام «لیون» دارند.. سیسلیا دختری جوان و زیبا و براینی کوچکترین عضوِ خانواده، نوجوانی 13 ساله و رویاپرداز است که از کودکی عاشقِ نویسندگیست... دختر نوجوانی که شور زیادی دارد، ولی هنوز دنیای بزرگترها را به خوبی درک نکرده است... در کنارِ آنها، جوانی مهربان و مسئولیت پذیر به نام «روبی ترنر» زندگی میکند.. روبی پسرِ سرایدارِ خانوادۀ تالیس است که آنها هزینۀ تحصیل او را داده اند.. روبی همسن و سالِ سی سی یا همان سیسیلیاست.. هر دو قصد دارند تا در رشتۀ پزشکی کمبریج درس بخوانند... سی سی و روبی دلباختۀ یکدیگرند.. ولی از سویِ دیگر، براینی نیز در عالمِ کودکی، عاشقِ روبی شده است... بر اثرِ یک اتفاق، روبی باعثِ شکستنِ گلدانِ سی سی میشود و برایِ عذرخواهی برایِ او نامه ای مینویسد.. ولی در هنگامِ نوشتنِ نامۀ رسمی، آنچه در ذهنش میگذرد نیز به عنوانِ نامه ای جداگانه برایِ دلِ خویش مینویسد.. در نامه خطاب به سی سی مینویسد: در رویاهایم، نازت (کُصت) را میبوسم .. آنجا خیلی مرطوب و شیرین است
روبی این نوشته را به اشتباه به جای آن نامه رسمی و اصلی، در پاکت گذاشته و آن را به براینی میدهد تا او نامه را به سی سی برساند.. ولی زمانی متوجه اشتباهش میشود که دیگر دیر شده و براینی به خانه رسیده و با کنجکاوی پاکت را باز کرده و آن را میخواند.. با خواندن این جملات در ذهنش روبی تبدیل به یک بیمار جنسی میشود که به خواهرش سی سی نظر دارد......... لیون برادرِ سی سی و براینی، از سفر بازگشته و دوستش «پُل مارشال» که کارخانۀ شکلات سازی دارد را همراهِ خود به خانه می آورد... همان شب براینی، سی سی و روبی را در حالِ سکس در کتابخانه میبیند.. حسادت تمامِ وجودش را فرا میگیرد
داستان از جایی هیجان پیدا میکند که، پسر عموهایِ دوقلویِ براینی و سی سی، یعنی «جکسون» و «پیِرو» که به همراهِ خواهرشان «لولا» میهمانِ خانوادۀ تالیس هستند، از خانه آنها فرار کرده و در جنگل گُم میشوند.. شبانه تمامی اهلِ خانه، به دنبالِ این دو پسربچه از خانه خارج میشوند.. براینی در دلِ تاریکی و در زمینهایِ اطرافِ خانۀ پدری، ناگهان دختر عمویش لولا را درازکش بر روی زمین میبیند که مردی در حالِ تجاوز به اوست.. مرد با دیدنِ براینی فرار میکند.. لولا به کسی نمیگوید که آن مرد که بوده است!! پلیس برایِ جمع آوریِ اطلاعات به آنجا میرود.. براینی در یک اقدامِ احمقانه و کودکانه، بدونِ آنکه مطمئن باشد، شهادتِ دروغ میدهد و میگوید: کسی که به لولا تجاوز کرده است، روبی بوده است و او با چشمانش روبی را در حالِ فرار دیده است... به این ترتیب روبیِ بیچاره را به زندان میبرند... در آنجا دو راه پیش رویِ روبی میگذرانند، یا در زندان بماند و یا برایِ نبرد با نیروهای آلمانی به فرانسه اعزام شود... بدین ترتیب روبی که کلی آرزو در ذهن دارد، از آروزهایش و عشق به سی سی جدا شده و پای در میدانِ جنگِ جهانی میگذارد
عزیزانم، بهتر است خودتان این داستان را خوانده و از سرانجامِ غمبارِ این داستان و عشقِ دردناکِ سی سی و روبی، آگاه شوید
****************
دوستان عزیزم، برخی اوقات، با یک کارِ اشتباه، میتوانیم زندگی و آیندۀ دیگران را تباه کنیم... زمانی که زندگیِ کسی ویران شود، به هیچ ترتیب نمیتوان آن را جبران کرد.. با آنکه هرکاری کنید و پیشِ خودتان تصور کنید که «تاوان» آن را پس داده اید.. ولی چیزی که نابود شده، دیگر جبران نخواهد شد.. پس پیش از گفتار و کردارِ خویش، به سرانجام آن از هر نظر بی اندیشید
---------------------------------------------
امیدوارم این ریویو در جهتِ آشنایی با این کتاب، کافی و مفید بوده باشه
«پیروز باشید و ایرانی»
April 17,2025
... Show More
Atonement is a story of moral issues and the story is sad…
Here she was, offering a possibility of absolution. But it was not for him. He had done nothing wrong. It was for herself, for her own crime which her conscience could no longer bear. Was he supposed to feel grateful? And yes, of course, she was a child in 1935. He had told himself, he and Cecilia had told each other, over and again. Yes, she was just a child. But not every child sends a man to prison with a lie. Not every child is so purposeful and malign, so consistent over time, never wavering, never doubted. A child, but that had not stopped him daydreaming in his cell of her humiliation, of a dozen ways he might find revenge.

Does time revenge mistakes of childhood? Or does God?
Anyway if such errors lead to the ruination of lives revenge can’t be sweet…
April 17,2025
... Show More
Why, in a book containing violent rape, is the narrative preoccupied with condemning a young girl whose only crime was accusing the wrong man? Why, in a book containing violent rape, does the prose constantly refer to the girl's error as a "crime" and a "sin," as if it rose to the level of the rape itself? Why, in a book where two characters are fully cognizant of the rapist's identity (the rapist and his victim), is the girl with only partial knowledge raked over the coals for sending an innocent man to jail?

Then there are the strains on credulity: What kind of young woman believes the charlady's son over her own 13-year-old sister? What kind of young woman disowns her family for an accused rapist and remains faithful to him for years on the basis of a single romp in the library? What kind of young woman in the 1930s receives a note about her c*nt and finds it charming? (Plausible alternatives: "creepy" and "f*cking creepy.")

Why does this book turn into a war documentary halfway through? Why are we treated to every character's point-of-view except the rapist and his victim? How many panoramic views of flesh wounds and bedpans does it take to substitute for actual scene and character development?

And finally, why does anyone find any merit in this book whatsoever?
April 17,2025
... Show More
Esta es una de esas reseñas que cuesta mucho escribir, porque este libro me ha parecido una pasada y me ha dejado casi sin palabras, al menos hasta que lo madure un poco. Creo que lo más importante para disfrutar esta obra es no saber nada, si es posible, porque es un libro que va creciendo poco a poco, que va mezclando personajes y sucesos y te hace pasar por una auténtica montaña rusa de emociones y sorpresas.

Se divide en tres partes muy diferenciadas y un epílogo. Tal vez la parte que más difícil se me hizo de leer fue la segunda, ya que transcurre en un escenario que no me apasiona como género, pero igualmente he disfrutado el libro en su totalidad, porque es una de esas historias que fluyen y de la que vas descubriendo cosas poquito a poco, y en la que los personajes se van quedando contigo y te van haciendo mutar la opinión que tenías sobre ellos.

Es lo primero que leo de este autor y creo que he empezado por su mejor obra. Me ha encantado la forma en que está escrita y distribuida, he disfrutado muchísimo con su prosa, en especial en la primera parte. Maravilloso, uno de los mejores libros que he leído.
April 17,2025
... Show More
When I read a contemporary 21st century novel, especially a really good one, I often wonder, will it become a classic? Will people still be reading it 150 years from now? It's hard to know of course. Occasionally I read one that I think will still be around, will be read and appreciated years from now. Atonement is one of those. The setting, the plot, the time period, the historical aspect, were all perfectly connected. The characters were so real that I felt like I was reading a historical record of their lives. The writing was brilliant, as good as I have read., and I read a lot. Yes, I think this novel will become a classic, it already is in my mind.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I loved everything about this novel—the storytelling, the inner dialogue which rang so true, and the structure of telling a story in a kind of wave form: the plot moved forward like the tide hitting the beach, then was drawn out in an undertow, going back in time, then flowing in again as another point of view of the same time, and thus it keeps progressing and surprising. What tension, what detail, what a wonderful portrait of a child writer awash in the drama of her fantastic certainty and imagination. I wager anybody who writes will remember themselves through the character of young Briony, whose self-aggrandizing fantasies and need to be the hero of her own drama lead to tragedy. She embodies a time of life that some of us grow out of and then hate ourselves for … until we mature enough to realize that everybody does this stuff and we forgive ourselves for being human. But in this astonishing masterpiece, McEwan, whom I would call a “writer’s writer” because of his ability to reveal that very private process that is usually unspoken, takes us well past that … to atonement.

Usually I’m bored by a lot of inner dialogue. I’ve come to associate it with Women’s Fiction where mostly I find it to be overwriting. I had no problems with whole chapters of inner dialogue in this book—perhaps because so much of it was the kind of psychological searching for who and how we really are that I’ve always done. Plus, the writing is spectacular.

This is my second Ian McEwan book. The first was his hysterically funny n  Nutshelln. Atonement is nothing like Nutshell. I guess I’m going to have to read all of McEwan’s books. (Thanks, Goodreader Fred J.)
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.