...
Show More
If you had handed me this story in the form of a film script, I'd have written it off as far too melodramatic and unrealistic to sustain that all-important willing suspension of disbelief. I'd have laughed in your face. Even Michael Bay would find this sequence of events too unbelievable to render on film. And yet this is how it went down. I'm personally not really old enough to remember the pre-9/11 world, but it is probably the defining event of our lifetimes and shaped the era we still live in. To distill the churning cauldron of emotions boiling in my brain into a goodreads review seems a futile task, but I'll endeavour to try.
The Looming Tower is effectively two stories. The first weaves the complex tapestry of events, personalities and light-speed socio-economic changes in the Arab world that gave rise to the murderous and twisted vision of Islam embraced by Al-Qaeda, of whom our principal players are Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zahawari. The second focuses on the small group of bickering bureaucrats in the FBI and CIA who charted Al-Qaeda's rise through their early attacks, saw the attacks coming, and failed to prevent them.
This is a fantastic book, which goes right into the mid-20th century roots of jihadist fundamentalism, deep into the philosophical debates forged in Egyptian prisons, onto the sands of Saudi Arabia, during what must have been the most remarkable few decades in its history as one of the world's biggest economies just exploded out of the sand in the hands of a few powerful tribes who beforehand were more or less still desert nomads. From there we go to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, to Sudan, to Yemen, Kenya, Tanzania. It's amazing given the detail and depth of the narrative that it remained so taut and tense, less like a comprehensive history than a John Le Carré spy thriller. To understand the world we inherited after 9/11, this feels like a must-read. The longterm plotting of the history of the Islamic fundamentalist turn from America as the one non-imperial superpower and saviour of the post World War II order, to the greatest evil on earth is fascinating, and so are the little details and vignettes of all the players. Bin Laden will forever be a somewhat enigmatic figure, and yet it was hard not to compare his love of the primitive, and the romance of the Arabian desert and the cave to a weird mirror image of T.E. Lawrence, fighting his own kind of independence movement. The parallels between Bin Laden and the tragic (in the Greek sense of the word) figure of FBI counterterrorism chief John O'Neil, in their faiths and attitudes towards women were also skilfully drawn. I'm not sure this book can be read and not provoke an outpouring of reactions about how its readers see the world. Mine are outlined below.
I will try to differentiate my response from 'Jessica's fantastic review from 2012 on this site (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...) because more than 10 years after that review, and almost 20 years after this book was published, many of her thoughts ring true. Similarly to Jessica, 9/11 is an event that I don't like to talk about with many people because of the way the U.S. reacted. People occasionally write with sad nostalgia about the 'September 12th spirit' that unified the nation in solidarity, sympathy and support with the victims in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania, a spirit that soon was squandered. I was 5, so I can't speak with any authority on the extent of or how long this spirit actually lasted, although I would point people to Howard Stern's radio broadcast during the attacks as evidence that many Americans reacted immediately with the kind of ugly racism and apocalyptic war-mongering that would characterise the long term response. I frequently fall down Wikipedia 9/11 rabbit holes – it is just such a mind-boggling event – but I don't tend to talk to Americans about it, precisely because what came after 9/11 was such an unmitigated disaster for America on the world stage, and I don't want to hear people attempt to justify the millions of innocent lives that were lost in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
De-radicalisation is something I thought about a lot while reading this one, as political polarisation continually pushes Americans further apart. How do you convince a QAnon believer that Democrats aren't harvesting kids' adrenochrome? How do you reason with somebody whose beliefs are rooted in an absence of evidence? How can you unpick the steel-like strands of fanaticism? The Looming Tower scared me, most notably in that it makes me feel less certain that you can always change people's minds. As Jessica notes in that review from 2012, I fear that sitting down with somebody like Mohamad Atta would not de-radicalise him. The more he learned about me (majored in English Lit, writing about feminist texts, Jewish authors, infidel artists etc, moved abroad to teach English in China, now working for the U.S. government to promote western culture in developing countries) the more he'd be convinced that killing me would make his world a better place. And the more I learned about him (including the fact a staple meal for him would be a few scoops of cold mashed potato from a small mountain of mash he kept in the fridge and his almost horrified aversion to women), the more I would be convinced that this man was an incredibly big piece of shit who needed more cuddles as a child and would have benefited from therapy, two things which he would recoil at as even more evidence of my inherent demonic beliefs.
Speaking of conspiracy theories and radical beliefs, it is hard to read The Looming Tower and conclude that America's government was in any fit state of making 9/11 an inside job. I'm not going to waste many words on this, but a conspiracy of that scale requires either the participation of huge numbers of people, or high levels of secrecy and coordination by a small group of highly skilled actors. In contrast, Lawrence Wright portrays a shitstorm of petty infighting, bureaucratic intransigence and unnecessary, ego-driven weiner waggling that meant the right people didn't get hold of crucial evidence until it was far too late. The panicked, rushing last few chapters of the book are devastating, and – not for the first time – will have readers fuming at the American government, but particularly the CIA, who do not come out of this mess looking good at all. I personally was completely unaware that the CIA had hard evidence of Al-Qaeda hijackers in the country 18 months before the attack, and yet refused to share that information with the FBI. When this evidence finally came to the FBI in the wake of the attacks, one agent had the hijackers identified and irrefutably linked to Al-Qaeda in 5 days. 18 months to sit on the intelligence. And all they would have needed was 5 days to solve it. It's at this point in the review where I would express my shock that all the major CIA players involved in this book were promoted and some even awarded honours, but I'm cynical enough now to be surprised if these sorts of people ever face any semblance of justice.
I feel odd working as a representative of America, partly because I was raised outside America, but mostly because I find it hard to defend its recent record on the world stage. As Wright notes, America's response to the 9/11 attacks was exactly what Bin Laden wanted, to have the world's greatest economy poured into two decades of mostly pointless conflict, to lose respect from its allies (only Britain was supine enough to follow the United States into the Middle East), and largely destabilise the region. The Taliban are back in Afghanistan, Libya is a mess, Syria is (hopefully) taking its first steps towards what might be a brighter future, Yemen is still starving, and Israel is committing war crimes left, right and centre. It is, in short, the world that Bin Laden and al-Zawahiri, now both dead, had hoped would radicalise the next generation of jihadists. As technology progresses, AI, drones, computer viruses, and even the awful spectre of computer-GENERATED biological viruses are all either on the horizon or already here. These threats aren't going away.
And it makes me sad. It makes me sad because America should have managed better. Although my foreign policy views are more dovish than hawkish, I think a short term military response may have been warranted in Afghanistan, but the long term occupation of both countries has only resulted in more chaos, more poverty, more displacement, and in short, more misery. I'm not enough of a pessimist to say that the terrorists won, but the United States, along with Europe and most of the rest of the democratic world, sacrificed significant personal freedoms in the wake of 9/11. Many of the actions taken made America look just as bad as the repressive dictatorships most of these religious figures were condemning in the first place. These precedents were adopted by other great powers to justify further incursions of human rights, ethnic cleansing and forced labour camps for Muslims. Were those sacrifices necessary? Did Americans make themselves safer? Some may point to the absence of a 9/11-level attack in the following years as proof that Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and all the other crimes committed in the name of the American people were worth it. In doing so, the United States created an all-seeing security state, and handed even greater power to unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats. Our right to privacy may be gone, but the fundamentalist Islamic ideology still remains, mutating and shifting to copycat, 'leaderless resistance' attacks such as those carried out by ISIS in the 2010s. In the immediate wake of 9/11, the Arab world was firmly united against Al-Qaeda. After all, the hijackers didn't only murder Americans; they murdered plenty of Muslims from the Middle East too. The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, however, were compelling evidence to the extremists' narrative that the U.S. wanted to take over the Middle East. It saddens me to read Wright's 2011 afterword, ending on a note of tentative hope in the months that followed the Arab Spring. What began as a movement of such promise ended with, if anything, even worse conditions of instability, violence and death - conditions which contributed to the rise of ISIS.
In short, the United States created a new world because of the events described in this book. We owe it to ourselves to understand why. The Looming Tower is as comprehensive a guide to how this world was made as any I've read.
The Looming Tower is effectively two stories. The first weaves the complex tapestry of events, personalities and light-speed socio-economic changes in the Arab world that gave rise to the murderous and twisted vision of Islam embraced by Al-Qaeda, of whom our principal players are Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zahawari. The second focuses on the small group of bickering bureaucrats in the FBI and CIA who charted Al-Qaeda's rise through their early attacks, saw the attacks coming, and failed to prevent them.
This is a fantastic book, which goes right into the mid-20th century roots of jihadist fundamentalism, deep into the philosophical debates forged in Egyptian prisons, onto the sands of Saudi Arabia, during what must have been the most remarkable few decades in its history as one of the world's biggest economies just exploded out of the sand in the hands of a few powerful tribes who beforehand were more or less still desert nomads. From there we go to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, to Sudan, to Yemen, Kenya, Tanzania. It's amazing given the detail and depth of the narrative that it remained so taut and tense, less like a comprehensive history than a John Le Carré spy thriller. To understand the world we inherited after 9/11, this feels like a must-read. The longterm plotting of the history of the Islamic fundamentalist turn from America as the one non-imperial superpower and saviour of the post World War II order, to the greatest evil on earth is fascinating, and so are the little details and vignettes of all the players. Bin Laden will forever be a somewhat enigmatic figure, and yet it was hard not to compare his love of the primitive, and the romance of the Arabian desert and the cave to a weird mirror image of T.E. Lawrence, fighting his own kind of independence movement. The parallels between Bin Laden and the tragic (in the Greek sense of the word) figure of FBI counterterrorism chief John O'Neil, in their faiths and attitudes towards women were also skilfully drawn. I'm not sure this book can be read and not provoke an outpouring of reactions about how its readers see the world. Mine are outlined below.
I will try to differentiate my response from 'Jessica's fantastic review from 2012 on this site (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...) because more than 10 years after that review, and almost 20 years after this book was published, many of her thoughts ring true. Similarly to Jessica, 9/11 is an event that I don't like to talk about with many people because of the way the U.S. reacted. People occasionally write with sad nostalgia about the 'September 12th spirit' that unified the nation in solidarity, sympathy and support with the victims in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania, a spirit that soon was squandered. I was 5, so I can't speak with any authority on the extent of or how long this spirit actually lasted, although I would point people to Howard Stern's radio broadcast during the attacks as evidence that many Americans reacted immediately with the kind of ugly racism and apocalyptic war-mongering that would characterise the long term response. I frequently fall down Wikipedia 9/11 rabbit holes – it is just such a mind-boggling event – but I don't tend to talk to Americans about it, precisely because what came after 9/11 was such an unmitigated disaster for America on the world stage, and I don't want to hear people attempt to justify the millions of innocent lives that were lost in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
De-radicalisation is something I thought about a lot while reading this one, as political polarisation continually pushes Americans further apart. How do you convince a QAnon believer that Democrats aren't harvesting kids' adrenochrome? How do you reason with somebody whose beliefs are rooted in an absence of evidence? How can you unpick the steel-like strands of fanaticism? The Looming Tower scared me, most notably in that it makes me feel less certain that you can always change people's minds. As Jessica notes in that review from 2012, I fear that sitting down with somebody like Mohamad Atta would not de-radicalise him. The more he learned about me (majored in English Lit, writing about feminist texts, Jewish authors, infidel artists etc, moved abroad to teach English in China, now working for the U.S. government to promote western culture in developing countries) the more he'd be convinced that killing me would make his world a better place. And the more I learned about him (including the fact a staple meal for him would be a few scoops of cold mashed potato from a small mountain of mash he kept in the fridge and his almost horrified aversion to women), the more I would be convinced that this man was an incredibly big piece of shit who needed more cuddles as a child and would have benefited from therapy, two things which he would recoil at as even more evidence of my inherent demonic beliefs.
Speaking of conspiracy theories and radical beliefs, it is hard to read The Looming Tower and conclude that America's government was in any fit state of making 9/11 an inside job. I'm not going to waste many words on this, but a conspiracy of that scale requires either the participation of huge numbers of people, or high levels of secrecy and coordination by a small group of highly skilled actors. In contrast, Lawrence Wright portrays a shitstorm of petty infighting, bureaucratic intransigence and unnecessary, ego-driven weiner waggling that meant the right people didn't get hold of crucial evidence until it was far too late. The panicked, rushing last few chapters of the book are devastating, and – not for the first time – will have readers fuming at the American government, but particularly the CIA, who do not come out of this mess looking good at all. I personally was completely unaware that the CIA had hard evidence of Al-Qaeda hijackers in the country 18 months before the attack, and yet refused to share that information with the FBI. When this evidence finally came to the FBI in the wake of the attacks, one agent had the hijackers identified and irrefutably linked to Al-Qaeda in 5 days. 18 months to sit on the intelligence. And all they would have needed was 5 days to solve it. It's at this point in the review where I would express my shock that all the major CIA players involved in this book were promoted and some even awarded honours, but I'm cynical enough now to be surprised if these sorts of people ever face any semblance of justice.
I feel odd working as a representative of America, partly because I was raised outside America, but mostly because I find it hard to defend its recent record on the world stage. As Wright notes, America's response to the 9/11 attacks was exactly what Bin Laden wanted, to have the world's greatest economy poured into two decades of mostly pointless conflict, to lose respect from its allies (only Britain was supine enough to follow the United States into the Middle East), and largely destabilise the region. The Taliban are back in Afghanistan, Libya is a mess, Syria is (hopefully) taking its first steps towards what might be a brighter future, Yemen is still starving, and Israel is committing war crimes left, right and centre. It is, in short, the world that Bin Laden and al-Zawahiri, now both dead, had hoped would radicalise the next generation of jihadists. As technology progresses, AI, drones, computer viruses, and even the awful spectre of computer-GENERATED biological viruses are all either on the horizon or already here. These threats aren't going away.
And it makes me sad. It makes me sad because America should have managed better. Although my foreign policy views are more dovish than hawkish, I think a short term military response may have been warranted in Afghanistan, but the long term occupation of both countries has only resulted in more chaos, more poverty, more displacement, and in short, more misery. I'm not enough of a pessimist to say that the terrorists won, but the United States, along with Europe and most of the rest of the democratic world, sacrificed significant personal freedoms in the wake of 9/11. Many of the actions taken made America look just as bad as the repressive dictatorships most of these religious figures were condemning in the first place. These precedents were adopted by other great powers to justify further incursions of human rights, ethnic cleansing and forced labour camps for Muslims. Were those sacrifices necessary? Did Americans make themselves safer? Some may point to the absence of a 9/11-level attack in the following years as proof that Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and all the other crimes committed in the name of the American people were worth it. In doing so, the United States created an all-seeing security state, and handed even greater power to unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats. Our right to privacy may be gone, but the fundamentalist Islamic ideology still remains, mutating and shifting to copycat, 'leaderless resistance' attacks such as those carried out by ISIS in the 2010s. In the immediate wake of 9/11, the Arab world was firmly united against Al-Qaeda. After all, the hijackers didn't only murder Americans; they murdered plenty of Muslims from the Middle East too. The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, however, were compelling evidence to the extremists' narrative that the U.S. wanted to take over the Middle East. It saddens me to read Wright's 2011 afterword, ending on a note of tentative hope in the months that followed the Arab Spring. What began as a movement of such promise ended with, if anything, even worse conditions of instability, violence and death - conditions which contributed to the rise of ISIS.
In short, the United States created a new world because of the events described in this book. We owe it to ourselves to understand why. The Looming Tower is as comprehensive a guide to how this world was made as any I've read.