...
Show More
3.5 stars
A bit of a sampler of Didion’s essays from a number of other works. Some feel a bit dated, but overall I was struck by how much I wish journos today wrote more like her. She provides such a breadth of context to the issues she is writing about. Her article on the Central Park 5 (written before their exoneration) is a fascinating exploration of how urban narratives and myth making around the identity of NYC contributed to the coverage and biases around the case and highlight the inconsistencies that might have generated reasonable doubt. The piece on the shifting frames of post-9/11 public dialogue in the US was both beautifully written and compelling. And I definitely need to track down Salvador so that I can read the whole thing.
A bit of a sampler of Didion’s essays from a number of other works. Some feel a bit dated, but overall I was struck by how much I wish journos today wrote more like her. She provides such a breadth of context to the issues she is writing about. Her article on the Central Park 5 (written before their exoneration) is a fascinating exploration of how urban narratives and myth making around the identity of NYC contributed to the coverage and biases around the case and highlight the inconsistencies that might have generated reasonable doubt. The piece on the shifting frames of post-9/11 public dialogue in the US was both beautifully written and compelling. And I definitely need to track down Salvador so that I can read the whole thing.