...
Show More
Since I am finally viewing the Ken Burns Vietnam documentary I have dreaded seeing, I decided to listen to this memoir O'Brien began writing in Nam thru his journal and letters. He actually published pieces of it soon after he returned to Minnesota. Like me, O'Brien read deeply into the war and took a principled stance against it, but unlike me he actually went, citing cowardice as his main reason for finally agreeing to go. In his story he is almost matter of fact about the horrors these young men experience, and as he says in an interview, forty years later he is stilling dealing with the trauma of watching his friends lose body parts or get blown to bits over a war he knew even as a young man was based on misjudgments and lies. And lies to cover the lies: Johnson, McNamara, Westmoreland, even Kennedy, just extending the colonialist impulses of the French in that country.
And the racism, misogyny, the ignorance and arrogance fostered by military leaders in these young men who just wanted to either 1) kill as many of the "enemy" as possible, not knowing why they were even the enemy besides being Communist, and 2) just wanting to go home. Most of them 18 and 19.
At one point he suggests that maybe the thing we might learn from that war is to allow no more Liars as leaders, but the lies of Iraq, the daily lies now, a young man's optimism. I liked the debate O'Brien has with a hawk chaplain justifying My Lai, where women and children and the elderly were slaughtered.
I like how greater books emerged out of this like the incomparable The Things They Carried and Going After Cacciato (that escape fantasy was there in Combat Zone) and the My Lai madness novel In the Lake of the Woods that almost drove him to suicide, that book began in a sense while he was already there.
While Ken Burns is no radical, we can see the deep and howlingly mad critique of O'Brien, one of the consultants on the series, throughout the film series. Already in the first episode I cried 3-4 times, thinking of my cousin Berg killed there and so many young men-just boys, really, a children's campaign, as are most wars--who died there senselessly. Domino theory, indeed. A portrait in courage.
And the racism, misogyny, the ignorance and arrogance fostered by military leaders in these young men who just wanted to either 1) kill as many of the "enemy" as possible, not knowing why they were even the enemy besides being Communist, and 2) just wanting to go home. Most of them 18 and 19.
At one point he suggests that maybe the thing we might learn from that war is to allow no more Liars as leaders, but the lies of Iraq, the daily lies now, a young man's optimism. I liked the debate O'Brien has with a hawk chaplain justifying My Lai, where women and children and the elderly were slaughtered.
I like how greater books emerged out of this like the incomparable The Things They Carried and Going After Cacciato (that escape fantasy was there in Combat Zone) and the My Lai madness novel In the Lake of the Woods that almost drove him to suicide, that book began in a sense while he was already there.
While Ken Burns is no radical, we can see the deep and howlingly mad critique of O'Brien, one of the consultants on the series, throughout the film series. Already in the first episode I cried 3-4 times, thinking of my cousin Berg killed there and so many young men-just boys, really, a children's campaign, as are most wars--who died there senselessly. Domino theory, indeed. A portrait in courage.