Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
31(31%)
4 stars
40(40%)
3 stars
29(29%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
This book gives you a great insight on how our universe works (sans gravity). It doesn't give you the maths required to calculate the actual probabilities, but it does give you a framework to understand the math if you decide to learn it (for example from Feynman's Lectures)
April 17,2025
... Show More
Sometimes, it's too late, but that makes you do it better. You probably imagine that this book is a physics text. Well, it is, but that that's not what it really is. Really, it's a love letter to a dead woman. Feynman says in his introduction that his friend Alix Mautner had always wanted him to explain quantum electrodynamics to her so that she could understand it, and he'd never gotten around to doing that. Now it was too late. But, somehow, you can see that that only made him want to do it, not just well (he did everything well), but perfectly. If the book was perfect, that would make up for its appearing after Alix was no longer around to read it. It may seem like an odd formula, but it worked for Dante, and it also worked for Feynman.

The rest of this review is available elsewhere (the location cannot be given for Goodreads policy reasons)

April 17,2025
... Show More
"This is the third of four lectures on a rather difficult subject—the theory of quantum electrodynamics—and since there are obviously more people here tonight than there were before, some of you haven't heard the other two lectures and will find this lecture incomprehensible. Those of you who have heard the other two lectures will also find this lecture incomprehensible, but you know that that's alright: as I explained in the first lecture, the way we have to describe Nature is generally incomprehensible to us."
April 17,2025
... Show More
Renowned physicist Richard Feynman had promised for years to explain quantum electrodynamics to Alix Mautner, whose degree was in English literature. When she died, he finally sat down and put together this sequence of four lectures — and he did it, somewhat miraculously — without any of the mind-bogglingly complex equations that are so intimidating even to the most math-hardened of graduate students. Indeed, Feynman explains quantum electrodynamics purely conceptually, making me wonder why we don't teach it to children in junior high.

My one wish is that someone had made me read this book before I took quantum back in college, because for the first time I truly felt like I understood the calculations my professor tried to teach me.

Do not be deceived: this is not a book "merely for an English major to understand science." Feynman is explicit about when he is leaving out information, and he doesn't misrepresent anything. I read this book because I thought it would help me with my own research, and it has. The miracle of QED is that it would serve practically anyone else just as well, scientist or not.

The first three chapters are mainly about light and quantum theory — and explicitly neglect discussions of polarization. The fourth chapter ties quantum electrodynamics into particle physics, introducing quarks and discussing polarization somewhat briefly.

Three complaints come to mind with this book. Firstly, I wish Feynman had included information about polarization — perhaps in footnotes. Secondly, the figure captions are sometimes redundant, and one has to flip back and forth between text and appropriate figures (this objection may concern only the specific edition I read). Thirdly, I want more.

I rarely dispense five-star ratings, but QED has earned it. All hail Feynman.
April 17,2025
... Show More

Esta es una de las muchas incursiones que hizo el gran Feynman en el terreno de la divulgación científica. En realidad él no escribió ninguno de sus libros de divulgación científica, sino que se adaptaron de sus ciclos de conferencias de divulgación, que, ahí sí, Feynman preparaba a conciencia. Este libro surge de una serie de cuatro conferencias que dio Feynman en UCLA (que en inglés no se dice ucla sino u-c-l-a, iusielei, dato CPI para viajeros por tierras californianas).


La electrodinámica cuántica, además de asustar con su nombre chulo y molón, es la parte de la física que se encarga de estudiar las interacciones entre la luz y la materia (o, más concretamente, entre los fotones y los electrones). Es, abreviando, la teoría del electromagnetismo pero en versión cuántica. La electrodinámica cuántica no entra en las reacciones nucleares o intra-nucleares. Feynman contribuyó decisivamente al desarrollo de esta teoría, motivo por el que recibió su premio Nobel de 1965.


Feynman logra la hazaña de hacer algo más comprensible la mecánica cuántica a partir de unas pocas situaciones bastante simples. Cuando iluminamos un cristal de frente, dependiendo del grosor del cristal, se refleja más o menos luz, en valores que oscilan desde el 4% al 16%. El resto de la luz atraviesa el cristal (técnicamente un cristal es otra cosa y una ventana es un vidrio). Feynman reconstruye los mecanismos básicos de la teoría cuántica a partir de la explicación de este fenómeno.


Después, otra pregunta simple. ¿Por qué la luz, al rebotar en un espejo, sale reflejada con el mismo ángulo con el que llegó? Esta simple pregunta sirve para plantear toda la teoría de integrales de caminos de Feynman, que explica un montón de fenómenos cotidianos. Cuando un electrón va de A a B rebotando en un espejo, según el modelo de la Electrodinámica cuántica, no sigue un camino sino muchos (de hecho, todos los posibles). Para cada camino hay asociada una probabilidad y una fase, concepto crucial que Feynman explica como un maestro que fue. La suma de todos los caminos nos da el camino más probable, que resulta ser, oh sorpresa, la reflexión clásica en la que el ángulo de entrada es igual al ángulo de salida.




El rayo de luz rebotando en un espejo, base de la construcción de las integrales de caminos de Feynman.


Finalmente, Feynman da el salto y nos habla de las interacciones entre partículas, de la cromodinámica cuántica y usa profusamente sus diagramas (los famosos diagramas de Feynman), utilizando bastantes conceptos expuestos en los dos primeros capítulos (las dos primeras charlas).


n  n  
n  
n  Diagramas de Feynman. Aunque parezcan complicados Feynman los hace simples.n


El libro no es complicado en el sentido de que no tiene fórmulas ni desarrollos matemáticos. Feynman presupone una audiencia sin formación pero con capacidad de aprender y razonar. Comienza explicando cómo sumar dos flechas (vectores) y cómo sumar dos números (tiempos), y a partir de ahí tira para adelante. Sin embargo, tampoco es un libro de entretenimiento y pasar el rato. Hay conceptos que deben ser pensados un par de veces antes de seguir, y les recomiendo que no pasen a la siguiente cuestión sin entender la anterior.


Al acabar, uno tiene la sensación de que bajo el capó de las charlas de Feynman hay un increíble y complicadísimo mundo, cosa que es cierta, pero que uno ha aprendido los rudimentos básicos del funcionamiento de la luz y la materia, cosa que también es cierta. Feynman era un gran divulgador, y lo demuestra.


Mi nota: excepcional.

April 17,2025
... Show More
I can't say that I know mich physics than I've already known.
The explanation is good, you can understand, you are able to imagine things and if you are really interested I believe you can make suppositions. But I am not. I read the book because it sounded interesting and I thought that after reading it I would be more able to understand things. I am not. What I knew, I know.
Lots of formules - actually, I know something new: the way to calculate and that the result of an action is done by an arrow (which is the sum of tiny arrows, all the possible ways of an action).
I think that this book would be very interesting for people really into the subject.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I've never really understood all the hype about Feynman but this is basically a perfect layman's explanation of quantum phenomena.

Over the past couple decades, I've read maybe 15 books about physics / quantum mechanics / the Standard Model, etc., in an attempt to understand the basics, and I'm pretty sure I've got somewhat of handle on it . . . but I have to wonder to what extent the complexities are only graspable to people who have done the math. My only basis for comparison is philosophy, and I feel like anyone who has read 15 books explaining philosophy at a layman's level will probably misunderstand most of the major figures.

Anyway, I'm always fascinated by how dumb books like QED make me feel; with most fields I have a sense that I can find my way around reasonably quickly, but, uh, not so much here.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Cet ouvrage est bien plus complexe que la conférence précédente sur la nature de la physique
April 17,2025
... Show More
Last year I read couple of (edited) books on Feynman, namely, "What Do You Care What Other People Think?": Further Adventures of a Curious Character, and The Pleasure of Finding Things Out. Having read three books on/by Feynman – especially his involvement in investigation of Challenger Space Shuttle disaster, one thing was pretty clear – he is passionate about Science (well, his research speaks volume) and also, he is a good teacher (Personally, I believe that there are not many people who are good at both). In the same series of reading about Feynman’s works, I wanted to read this book -with one of the motivations was to understand the way he explains difficult concepts in a simple way. I am sort of person who understands and tries to explain the concepts using analogies.

Sometimes I do take a long break while reading non-fiction but Feynman’s way of explaining the concepts kept me hooked, made me think about the concepts further (I lost touch with Physics since more than a decade) – examples, analogies and removing assumptions layer by layer were all wonderful. Having said that, I might read it again after few days to understand the fourth chapter better.

As mentioned in Introduction of the book, it is a collection of lectures Feynman delivered at Auckland. There are few youtubes available too –
Chapter 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9nPM...
Chapter 2 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_6UR...
Chapter 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAsW-...
Chapter 4 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sZr5...
April 17,2025
... Show More
The particle view of physics and how Richard Feynman was able to explain all of the weird ways that light behaves was a thoroughly engrossing read. The intellectual feat that was performed by this man in creating a workable mathematics for the physics behind the way that light travels, and reflects is truly amazing. Using the simple concepts of rotation, spin, frequency, and depicting it all with some simple calculations involving arrows and simple algebra gave me a sense of awe at the simplicity of such a seemingly complicated subject. Even though I currently side with the field theory of Julian Schwinger, I must say that I can not blame anyone for using Q.E.D. as the model for their calculations.
Overall, I had to place this on my foundation list, seeing as it gives me inspiration for explaining the seemingly complicated in very simple terms that can be easily understood by many.
April 17,2025
... Show More

That's my position: I'm going to explain to you what the physicists are doing when they are predicting how Nature will behave, but I'm not going to teach you any tricks so you can do it efficiently.


Starting from the idea of photons as particles of light, Feynman develops a nontechnical, easily understandable theory of basic quantum electrodynamics, or QED. He uses it to give modern explanations of everyday phenomena such as reflection and refraction, before delving into the basic of electron-photon interactions (the so-called Feynman diagrams) which underly all phenomena except gravity and nuclear physics. No maths is involved, though he uses pictures creatively. In the final lecture, he talks about the experimental aspects and the cutting-edge developments of his time (gluons, quarks, chromodynamics etc).

If all sciences were so well explained in so few words with so much good will and humour, the ideas and intuition behind humanity's greatest achievements would be accessible to a much wider audience.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Seriously, I don't know how to write this review. I'd promise myself and you that I'll be updating this review as I begin to evolve my thought regarding this book and 'Theory of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)'.

Physics has become full of Mess, these recent days, since the discovery of quantum mechanics and perhaps you'd claim that Physics is Ugly.

Well I couldn't agree with you more, but on the other hand, Physicist and the whole of the physics community have done the great job of correlating these mess into a beautiful picture like 'Theory of Quantum electrodynamics'. Since, this is my first encounter with quantum electrodynamics or typo of these advanced topic, so this review is purely based upon my reading this book.

If this is your first time reading a book by Richard Feynman, assuming that you do have some good school or high school physics, I wouldn't recommend you to read 'Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! ', the reason being that I don't want you to have a picture of Feynman being animated personality and top class physicist. Rather, I want you to have this picture by understanding his way of explaining things and his excellent teaching style by reading this book. You'd be amazed how Feynman explains the interference and other several phenomena by simply the work of geometry-some arrows, their length and a stopwatch, whose revolving hand's speed can be changed :D

Lectures are really insightful. The main purpose of reading this book wouldn't be only to show off to someone that you've read 'QED' and know one or two things about this field, but to gain insightful way of carving wit out of complex topics like QED. I never would have thought about why we take a principle-reflecting of light on mirror-'the angle of reflection is equal to angle of incidence.'-the way it is. And like other cases that electron or photon doesn't travel only in straight lines to some destination but travel through every possible path, there is more to this principle that happens in real life. You'd ask why?

And this is the reason why I want you to read this book.

Feynman starts off the these lectures as these were intended for laymen, with simple ideas and tools, only to evolve these tools as the lectures progress so he could explain difficult topics like in the chapter 3 of this book: 'Electrons and their interactions'.

Only thing that was difficult to grasp was chapter 4: 'Loose ends' that discusses the theory of strong interactions that discusses about the quarks (particles that make up electrons protons, etc), gluons (particles that are exchanged between quarks). I believe chapter 4 needs re-reading and referring to other books if one is interested in it.

And last but not the least, I can't and shouldn't end this review not including at least a Feynman diagram, so here it goes.

Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.