...
Show More
An ambitious book that would have benefitted from being much longer. Paton tries to portray the complex nation that is South Africa - criminologically, ethnically, linguistically, economically, even ecologically - and gives us a snapshot in just 240 pages.
His attempts at rendering the language problem in South Africa make the novel difficult to read. It took me sometime to realise that the writer was using different styles in English to indicate when speakers are using different languages. Later on, Paton gets overwhelmed by this and resorts to telling us which language is being used. However the damage has already been done. Nearly all the dialogue in book one is uttered in Zulu, and there is hardly a complex sentence in it. This is wearing for English speakers, and also a sign of 'unsophisticated' English speech. My interpretation was that Paton was portraying Africans - even ordained priests - as uneducated and that this was patronising, an aspect of the white racial paternalism that the book seemed to be upholding almost to the end.
I don't know if Zulu allows of the construction of complex sentences, but the issue of style shifting and code switching was much better handled in A Brief History of Seven Killings where it was made apparent the characters were exploiting degrees of creolization of English for their own communicative needs. That was also a difficult read, but my impression was that that was my fault rather than the author's.
The ethos of white racial paternalism runs through the economic and ecological strands of the story. It gives us a summary of the significance of gold mining to the South African economy and how it was dependent on heavily coerced African labour. Less well done is the explanation of the ecological problems that are driving African labour off the land and into the cities in the first place. The fault is placed with traditional African methods; over dependence on cattle, not planting wood for fuel. and ploughing down hill rather than on the level. Luckily, the benevolent white man is around to educate and finance the African farmer. However, I find it hard to accept that methods that were adequate for millenia should suddenly fail once the white man arrives. More historical perspective is required for this story to be persuasive, not least the the realisation that rapid industrialisation brought exactly the same societal problems of family failure, substance abuse and criminality to Europeans as it did to Africans. But in South Africa that is hidden under the veil of racial politics.
One thread of the story I found compelling has the presence of 'hundreds of books' on Abraham Lincoln in Arthur Jarvis's library. Explicitly drawing the parallel between the racial politics in the United States and the Union of South Africa. But this wasn't explored. In the US slavery took root as a means of legitimizing the restriction of economic opportunities among different ethnic groups. One the outcomes of Apartheid was a means of preventing Afrikaners from facing economic competition from Blacks. But this relationship between economic pecking orders and racial pecking orders is much more thoroughly explored in The Grass is Singing.
More historical or at least narrative perspective is also required in the treatment of the Reverend Stephen Kumalo and his family. How was it exactly that his son, Absalom, left home and fell into a life of crime? Is that a usual outcome for the sons of African clergy? How is it his brother, John became an influential labour leader but has no religious faith? How did these brothers take such different paths? A bigger novel could have told us how (Wilbur Smith certainly would have). It could also have explained the ecological degradation of Ixópo, after all it happened in Kumalo's lifetime. The treatment of John Kumalo also adds to the white paternalist ethos. Here is a man who has risen to a position of leadership among Africans independently of white support, but he is shown as morally weak, disloyal and as a danger to his own followers. It's worth pointing out that powerful oratory was the hallmark of the pre-imprisonment Nelson Mandela. The man who ultimately prevented black South Africans "from turning to hating", when white South Africans had finally "turned to loving".
But of that was in the future when this book was written, it was published on the eve of the introduction of Apartheid. This gives the modern reader a terrible sense that things are going to get a lot worse before they got better. A sense that the writer doesn't seem to share until the final, brilliant closing section of book, when Kumaló goes up to the mountaintop. Here his story is narrated in third person English and not a bad first person translation of Zulu. Here he recognises that his career in the Church of England lets others see him as "a white man's dog", that European culture and technology is not just seen as the salvation of the African people, but may be the cause of their immediate problems. Here the darkness that still awaits Africa is finally apprehended.
Another central challenge this book presented me with is that it is written from the perspective of a confirmed and active Christianity, one that like Rev. Kumaló strikes me as naive. Yet when you get up onto the mountaintop you get to appreciate how faith can be a way to give focus to the complexity of life in South Africa. Christianity is after all the ultimate paternalist ethos.
His attempts at rendering the language problem in South Africa make the novel difficult to read. It took me sometime to realise that the writer was using different styles in English to indicate when speakers are using different languages. Later on, Paton gets overwhelmed by this and resorts to telling us which language is being used. However the damage has already been done. Nearly all the dialogue in book one is uttered in Zulu, and there is hardly a complex sentence in it. This is wearing for English speakers, and also a sign of 'unsophisticated' English speech. My interpretation was that Paton was portraying Africans - even ordained priests - as uneducated and that this was patronising, an aspect of the white racial paternalism that the book seemed to be upholding almost to the end.
I don't know if Zulu allows of the construction of complex sentences, but the issue of style shifting and code switching was much better handled in A Brief History of Seven Killings where it was made apparent the characters were exploiting degrees of creolization of English for their own communicative needs. That was also a difficult read, but my impression was that that was my fault rather than the author's.
The ethos of white racial paternalism runs through the economic and ecological strands of the story. It gives us a summary of the significance of gold mining to the South African economy and how it was dependent on heavily coerced African labour. Less well done is the explanation of the ecological problems that are driving African labour off the land and into the cities in the first place. The fault is placed with traditional African methods; over dependence on cattle, not planting wood for fuel. and ploughing down hill rather than on the level. Luckily, the benevolent white man is around to educate and finance the African farmer. However, I find it hard to accept that methods that were adequate for millenia should suddenly fail once the white man arrives. More historical perspective is required for this story to be persuasive, not least the the realisation that rapid industrialisation brought exactly the same societal problems of family failure, substance abuse and criminality to Europeans as it did to Africans. But in South Africa that is hidden under the veil of racial politics.
One thread of the story I found compelling has the presence of 'hundreds of books' on Abraham Lincoln in Arthur Jarvis's library. Explicitly drawing the parallel between the racial politics in the United States and the Union of South Africa. But this wasn't explored. In the US slavery took root as a means of legitimizing the restriction of economic opportunities among different ethnic groups. One the outcomes of Apartheid was a means of preventing Afrikaners from facing economic competition from Blacks. But this relationship between economic pecking orders and racial pecking orders is much more thoroughly explored in The Grass is Singing.
More historical or at least narrative perspective is also required in the treatment of the Reverend Stephen Kumalo and his family. How was it exactly that his son, Absalom, left home and fell into a life of crime? Is that a usual outcome for the sons of African clergy? How is it his brother, John became an influential labour leader but has no religious faith? How did these brothers take such different paths? A bigger novel could have told us how (Wilbur Smith certainly would have). It could also have explained the ecological degradation of Ixópo, after all it happened in Kumalo's lifetime. The treatment of John Kumalo also adds to the white paternalist ethos. Here is a man who has risen to a position of leadership among Africans independently of white support, but he is shown as morally weak, disloyal and as a danger to his own followers. It's worth pointing out that powerful oratory was the hallmark of the pre-imprisonment Nelson Mandela. The man who ultimately prevented black South Africans "from turning to hating", when white South Africans had finally "turned to loving".
But of that was in the future when this book was written, it was published on the eve of the introduction of Apartheid. This gives the modern reader a terrible sense that things are going to get a lot worse before they got better. A sense that the writer doesn't seem to share until the final, brilliant closing section of book, when Kumaló goes up to the mountaintop. Here his story is narrated in third person English and not a bad first person translation of Zulu. Here he recognises that his career in the Church of England lets others see him as "a white man's dog", that European culture and technology is not just seen as the salvation of the African people, but may be the cause of their immediate problems. Here the darkness that still awaits Africa is finally apprehended.
Another central challenge this book presented me with is that it is written from the perspective of a confirmed and active Christianity, one that like Rev. Kumaló strikes me as naive. Yet when you get up onto the mountaintop you get to appreciate how faith can be a way to give focus to the complexity of life in South Africa. Christianity is after all the ultimate paternalist ethos.