...
Show More
Am I the only one who found this shockingly derivative? It was like Faulkner light with muddy, pretentious laughingly garble sentences and similes intended to be So Profound. Honestly, I fault the editors for not chopping 75 pages of twisted adjectives and sentences that left me thinking, "Huh?!"
The clichés and stereotypes are abundant, especially the old-saw that black people are more compassionate and "good" than the hopelessly dysfunctional white people. The pseudo-Faulkner themes abound: incest. teen pregnancy, lynchings, damaged orphans, small-town whores, strong black women holding down the fort, schoolteacher spinster, etc. --PUHleez! The characters were consistently cardboard and ones we've seen a million times in Southern novels. The only remotely engaging one was Neva, the butch lesbian. I just despised the witch doctor-like Joody--her spiritualism rang false in every scene..
The attempted comic scenes were so unfunny that I didn't realize i was supposed to be amused. And there is NO way in hell a black family could raise a white child in 1957 Alabama!
Shame on you, Oprah, for honoring this junk!
The clichés and stereotypes are abundant, especially the old-saw that black people are more compassionate and "good" than the hopelessly dysfunctional white people. The pseudo-Faulkner themes abound: incest. teen pregnancy, lynchings, damaged orphans, small-town whores, strong black women holding down the fort, schoolteacher spinster, etc. --PUHleez! The characters were consistently cardboard and ones we've seen a million times in Southern novels. The only remotely engaging one was Neva, the butch lesbian. I just despised the witch doctor-like Joody--her spiritualism rang false in every scene..
The attempted comic scenes were so unfunny that I didn't realize i was supposed to be amused. And there is NO way in hell a black family could raise a white child in 1957 Alabama!
Shame on you, Oprah, for honoring this junk!