...
Show More
I'm conflicted about 'The Pillars of the Earth' by Ken Follett. On one hand, the novel is well researched and entertaining. On the other, it is overly long. It could have used an editor to reduce repetitive descriptions and to polish up parts of the plot. Also, everything had a feel of boilerplate about it, but I suspect that is due more to the requirements of writing a bestseller epic instead of a literary work. Nothing wrong with any of that for an entertainment read, of course!
I noticed how utterly futile religious faith was throughout the book's plot of building a cathedral, which is ironic considering much of what motivated characters was their religious beliefs. Being a good person or being bad simply had no effect on outcomes. People palaver a lot as they do about God bringing justice, rewards or blessings, but the story clearly shows if you are a Duke or a King or a rich merchant the power and authority that comes with position and money has more to do with how justice or blessings are distributed.
In any case, being female was a 'damnation' curse in the Middle Ages. No matter how beloved or adored a woman was, an enslavement is all that is expected or wanted from women in this medieval society. Ken Follett certainly got this history right. The one female character who has masculine freedoms has to live alone in a forest to be herself. The other strong female character, who pulls herself up into some wealth and respectability through hard work and taking risks, ends up losing everything again and again because she must support the men in her life rather than taking complete charge of her destiny due to the religious strictures and the structure of family life in the Middle Ages.
The men have a hard time of it too, to be sure, but some of them can afford to be hopeful dreamers by staying single or becoming monks. In Follett's world, being unmarried means being safe a bit longer. Marriage seems to bring on only hardships for both sexes in the novel. Fearful poverty is always on the horizon either due to weather or wars between the nobility or mentally ill parents or irresponsible husbands. Endless labor with no guaranteed future or reward is all there is for most folks until it's time to die. Hard-earned ownership of a straw house, or one of wood or one of stone for the matter, does not guarantee living without starvation and misery at some point in 'The Pillars of the Earth' no matter how much one might save or live sensibly. Even the mighty and amazing cathedral, a symbol of human perseverance and permanence, falls several times in the book. Follett doesn't allow anyone Grace. Winning is not an option in this soap opera.
Despite the chaos, and the failures of human justice and insight, and the uncertainty of living another 24 hours by the end of each chapter in the book, characters appear to overcome harsh reality with communal delusions and hope, no matter how unfulfilled, because of religious faith and class pride. True to life, come to think of it.
I think the author sometimes overwhelms his story with sadism, suffering and rape, while dramatically emphasizing the huge achievement it truly was to build cathedrals in the middle Middle Ages. Given the usual obstructive cantankerousness people exhibit in actual real life when building structures, maybe these piled-on traumas were true to life in the Middle Ages. However, in the end, the writing, to me, felt more like a soap opera mash-up of Candide and Gone With The Wind. I read on often with hilarity instead of concern, gentle reader. Regardless, I liked the story.
I noticed how utterly futile religious faith was throughout the book's plot of building a cathedral, which is ironic considering much of what motivated characters was their religious beliefs. Being a good person or being bad simply had no effect on outcomes. People palaver a lot as they do about God bringing justice, rewards or blessings, but the story clearly shows if you are a Duke or a King or a rich merchant the power and authority that comes with position and money has more to do with how justice or blessings are distributed.
In any case, being female was a 'damnation' curse in the Middle Ages. No matter how beloved or adored a woman was, an enslavement is all that is expected or wanted from women in this medieval society. Ken Follett certainly got this history right. The one female character who has masculine freedoms has to live alone in a forest to be herself. The other strong female character, who pulls herself up into some wealth and respectability through hard work and taking risks, ends up losing everything again and again because she must support the men in her life rather than taking complete charge of her destiny due to the religious strictures and the structure of family life in the Middle Ages.
The men have a hard time of it too, to be sure, but some of them can afford to be hopeful dreamers by staying single or becoming monks. In Follett's world, being unmarried means being safe a bit longer. Marriage seems to bring on only hardships for both sexes in the novel. Fearful poverty is always on the horizon either due to weather or wars between the nobility or mentally ill parents or irresponsible husbands. Endless labor with no guaranteed future or reward is all there is for most folks until it's time to die. Hard-earned ownership of a straw house, or one of wood or one of stone for the matter, does not guarantee living without starvation and misery at some point in 'The Pillars of the Earth' no matter how much one might save or live sensibly. Even the mighty and amazing cathedral, a symbol of human perseverance and permanence, falls several times in the book. Follett doesn't allow anyone Grace. Winning is not an option in this soap opera.
Despite the chaos, and the failures of human justice and insight, and the uncertainty of living another 24 hours by the end of each chapter in the book, characters appear to overcome harsh reality with communal delusions and hope, no matter how unfulfilled, because of religious faith and class pride. True to life, come to think of it.
I think the author sometimes overwhelms his story with sadism, suffering and rape, while dramatically emphasizing the huge achievement it truly was to build cathedrals in the middle Middle Ages. Given the usual obstructive cantankerousness people exhibit in actual real life when building structures, maybe these piled-on traumas were true to life in the Middle Ages. However, in the end, the writing, to me, felt more like a soap opera mash-up of Candide and Gone With The Wind. I read on often with hilarity instead of concern, gentle reader. Regardless, I liked the story.