...
Show More
Growing up as a kid in the 1950s and early '60s, my parents' house, like most, had a sheaf of magazines at various locations, the den (Popular Mechanics, Newsweek), the living room (Good Housekeeping, McCall's), even the bathroom (Readers Digest and a few TV Guides). McCall's was the most prominent, a regally displayed rag spread proudly across a corner table where, previously, contributing authors like F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ray Bradbury, William Faulkner, John Steinbeck, and...yes...Kurt Vonnegut could be found regularly, their stories much sought-after until entertainment trends would forever be changed by television. The best authors on the way up, if not already widely acclaimed, would later appear in the avante garde generation of contemporary print 2.0 in Esquire and Playboy. Lucky was a high schooler (hopped-up on testosterone) who could find a stack of those in the alley. But I digress. Hard to believe that a young Vonnegut, back in the day, would be paid a paltry $1,500 for a short story. As well as in other circulations like The Saturday Evening Post, Collier's, and Argosy which, though not in our house, were part of the larger mainstay of an American appetite for fiction. Interestingly, the short story by which this collection is titled appeared in Cosmopolitan in 1954. Decades before Burt Reynolds centerfold appeared--a liberational "happening" of the sexual revolution when I was in college, and a tipping point where journalistic integrity yielded to the editorial flourish of the magazine becoming a garish women's sex manual instead. The drink by the same name in the empowering TV series "Sex in the City" would further symbolize a reversal of the tables whereby mature women of means were randomly seducing men, and boy-toys being much younger, all things being equal, the status quo for casual sex and gaps in age was stood (deservedly, or perhaps not so much) on its head. So magazines did have their place. Still, even in their Golden Age, stories were lucky to survive their dog-eared magazine lifespan bundled with string for paper drives. Until savvy, aspiring publishers got wise to the nostalgic market value of reprinting them; worthy of discovery by fans--like myself--of certain authors--like Vonnegut--who had become icons. All that being said, my expectations were higher for the short-form Vonnegut. Much as I was rewarded by Updike's collection, before, in reading them (more than a hundred) some months ago. Sadly, this collection of KV's earlier talents--a work in progress--came up, well, short. "Welcome to the Monkey House" (1968) includes another 23 stories, and it has been so long since I read it, can only remember that it didn't strike me as being especially on par either at that time with his novels. So, to each his own. For my take, the stories are rather smarmy. The young writer feels compelled to rush to a satisfying resolution where conflict is brief and the characters who are minor enough get on with their troubled situations behind them smoothing things over nicely for the future. It's the expectation of readership--much like movies in that time--to look for happy endings. All tied up neatly together before the theater lights come back up. In Vonnegut's "Coda" to his career as a writer of periodicals, he finishes with an amusing defense of his roots as though to compensate for his being a native son of the Middle Western United States. Following the last, rather-dreadful pieces in the collection, it was a welcome act of decorating a cake that had not so properly been baked. Vonnegut is a giver. He's always mindful of his readers and I remain, my finger laden with gobs of icing on the tip, a fan.