...
Show More
n
Conrad's writing is striking and his insistent motifs of light and darkness, of the river which links the Thames of the opening to the Congo, manage to stay on the right side of over-laboured. There's an interesting nested narrative structure, too, though it's Marlow who remains the most affected by his tale; Marlow who is twice described as a sitting like a Buddha or an idol, linking him proleptically and in retrospect with Kurtz. And those final 4-5 pages are a masterly piece of writing: understated, and shattering in 'the girl's' lack of comprehension. Is that hopeful? Or an instance of refusing to see the vision that Kurtz and now Marlow can never escape? I think it might depend on the mood of the reader and that there might not be the intimations of possibilities that end Eliot's own The Wasteland.
A magnificent possibly nihilist vision in beautiful, beautiful prose.
But his soul was mad. Being alone in the wilderness, it had looked within itself, and, by heavens! I tell you, it had gone mad... No eloquence could have been so withering to one's belief in mankind as his final burst of sincerity.n
We all know that this is frequently read as an indictment of colonialism but while that's definitely one of the layers in this dense book, to merely read it in that way is to do it a profound disservice. The text it reminded me of most strongly is Eliot's The Waste Land - only this is written almost twenty years earlier and before WW1. Did Eliot take his title The Hollow Men from this passage?But the wilderness had found him out early, and had taken on him a terrible vengeance for the fantastic invasion. I think it had whispered to him things about himself which he did not know, things of which he had no conception till he took counsel with this great solitude - and the whisper had proved irresistibly fascinating , it echoed loudly within him because he was hollow at the core...
Conrad's writing is striking and his insistent motifs of light and darkness, of the river which links the Thames of the opening to the Congo, manage to stay on the right side of over-laboured. There's an interesting nested narrative structure, too, though it's Marlow who remains the most affected by his tale; Marlow who is twice described as a sitting like a Buddha or an idol, linking him proleptically and in retrospect with Kurtz. And those final 4-5 pages are a masterly piece of writing: understated, and shattering in 'the girl's' lack of comprehension. Is that hopeful? Or an instance of refusing to see the vision that Kurtz and now Marlow can never escape? I think it might depend on the mood of the reader and that there might not be the intimations of possibilities that end Eliot's own The Wasteland.
A magnificent possibly nihilist vision in beautiful, beautiful prose.