...
Show More
Actual rating: 1/2 star.
I like pseudo-science (and sometimes pseudo-history), but I couldn't finish this one. In large part that is because it is so poorly written, and so repetitive (Menzies informs us six times that he is a retired Royal Navy captain. In the first chapter.), and Menzies shows such a poor grasp on what good evidence is, that I had to bail.
I'm with the late Carl Sagan that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (and surely the claim that the Chinese discovered America is an extraordinary one), and Menzies doesn't provide anything like "extraordinary evidence." He does provide a lot of pretty pictures in the insert, which is why I give this one half a star.
I like pseudo-science (and sometimes pseudo-history), but I couldn't finish this one. In large part that is because it is so poorly written, and so repetitive (Menzies informs us six times that he is a retired Royal Navy captain. In the first chapter.), and Menzies shows such a poor grasp on what good evidence is, that I had to bail.
I'm with the late Carl Sagan that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (and surely the claim that the Chinese discovered America is an extraordinary one), and Menzies doesn't provide anything like "extraordinary evidence." He does provide a lot of pretty pictures in the insert, which is why I give this one half a star.