...
Show More
M. Scott Peck is a very readable writer. All of his books are page turners. I love his unique outlook. Most of the time, I am in total agreement with his thoughts. However, I don't agree with all of Peck's religious beliefs, and wonder if the events outlined in this book might have been interpreted differently by another psychiatrist.
Interpretation is of course, subjective. For instance, I am from Maine, where there are no earthquakes. My friend and I were in California together and experienced our first earthquake there at the same time. My thoughts during the shaking were, "A truck has struck the building!" Her thoughts were, "A giant is shaking the house!" We were both incorrect. It was an earthquake. I liked how exciting and creative her thoughts were, though. I thought Peck's writing was exciting, too. But I'm glad he is not my doctor.
Interpretation is of course, subjective. For instance, I am from Maine, where there are no earthquakes. My friend and I were in California together and experienced our first earthquake there at the same time. My thoughts during the shaking were, "A truck has struck the building!" Her thoughts were, "A giant is shaking the house!" We were both incorrect. It was an earthquake. I liked how exciting and creative her thoughts were, though. I thought Peck's writing was exciting, too. But I'm glad he is not my doctor.