...
Show More
I was surprised to find, at the back of this book, so many rave reviews (or at least passages thereof) published in impressive places, including both The New York Times and The NYT Book Review. I found the whole thing glib and shallow. I'm not especially concerned with how much of this "memoir" is historically accurate; I know there was a legal suit about alleged fictionalization and defamation in Running with Scissors, and I figure most memoirists deploy some artistic license whose extent readers aren't in a position to evaluate. The disappointment for me was the utter superficiality of this story. Burroughs doesn't owe readers a tale of salvation or transformation, but I can't identify a single change or insight derived from the experiences narrated here. Why bother telling a story of alcoholism, sobriety, love, and loss, if none of those experiences has any particular impact that the book is going to record? Both in dialogue and in narration, Burroughs boasts repeatedly of his "shallowness"; I agree. But I have no idea why a shallow human being should want to write a memoir, or why anyone else should want to read it.