...
Show More
In this collection of three short novels, “Leaf Storm” appeared first, but I read it last because it took me a few tries to get into. It was somewhat difficult to read, not in the least because there were three different first-person narrators who would take over for each other at every section break, and I often didn’t realize the narrator had changed until the little boy suddenly started referring to his late wife and it occurred to me that the little boy was no longer speaking, his grandfather was. That’s a sign of one of two things: either I wasn’t reading closely enough, which is totally possible, because “Leaf Storm” was a very slow, meditative story that I mostly read at night while nearly asleep. Or, the voices weren’t distinguished enough by the narration. This would not necessarily be a slur on Marquez, because the book is obviously a translation of what Marquez actually wrote. Perhaps there were linguistic markers which would have differentiated the voices from each other if I had read the book in its native Spanish.
The second novella was “No One Writes to the Colonel,” an incredibly bleak story about a older couple struggling to make ends meet while they wait for the husband’s military pension, which is apparently something like thirty years late in coming. In the meantime, they are raising a rooster that they hope to make some money off of via cockfights. The wife is sick, they’re both starving, and things just stay the same. Their circumstances change for the worse—move laterally at best.
The great redeeming story was the third, “Chronicles of a Death Foretold.” The basic story is about a small town that is shaken up when two brothers kill another young man of their acquaintance, due to a misunderstanding about their sister and her virginity. What was really amazing about it was the narrative choice—it unfolds like a documentary, with an unidentified narrator describing the process of collecting eyewitness accounts and piecing the story together. The story opens with the murder, and then moves backwards and forwards in time depending on whose perspective we’re getting at that moment. Here’s a sample:
The documentarian has the greatest storytelling challenge of any filmmaker, because he or she has to take a huge amount of information and characters and events and draw a relatively straight narrative line through it. The choice made by Marquez—to imagine a whole outside context for this story of some guy making an exhaustive investigation into this event via interviews, anecdotes, paperwork—is amazingly effective. And he uses it with such a light touch. It reminds me of all those novels from the 19th century that claim to have been compiled from letters found in mysterious diaries and stuff, just because it was in vogue at the time to pretend you found your story instead of creating it in your own head. I like these kinds of techniques, because they don’t fence in the story. This one bleeds out in all directions. It’s saturated with context, with different paths, with inner lives. In short, it’s wonderful.
The second novella was “No One Writes to the Colonel,” an incredibly bleak story about a older couple struggling to make ends meet while they wait for the husband’s military pension, which is apparently something like thirty years late in coming. In the meantime, they are raising a rooster that they hope to make some money off of via cockfights. The wife is sick, they’re both starving, and things just stay the same. Their circumstances change for the worse—move laterally at best.
The great redeeming story was the third, “Chronicles of a Death Foretold.” The basic story is about a small town that is shaken up when two brothers kill another young man of their acquaintance, due to a misunderstanding about their sister and her virginity. What was really amazing about it was the narrative choice—it unfolds like a documentary, with an unidentified narrator describing the process of collecting eyewitness accounts and piecing the story together. The story opens with the murder, and then moves backwards and forwards in time depending on whose perspective we’re getting at that moment. Here’s a sample:
Victoria Guzman, for her part, had been categorical with her answer that neither she nor her daughter knew that the men were waiting for Santiago Nasar to kill him. But in the course of her years she admitted that both knew it when he came into the kitchen to have his coffee. They had been told it by a woman who had passed by after five o’clock to beg a bit of milk, and who in addition had revealed the motives and the place where they were waiting. “I didn’t warn him because I thought it was drunkards’ talk,” she told me. Nevertheless, Divina Flor confessed to me on a later visit, after her mother had died, that the latter hadn’t said anything to Santiago Nasar because in the depths of her heart she wanted them to kill him. She, on the other hand, didn’t warn him because she was nothing but a frightened child at the time, incapable of a decision of her own, and she’d been all the more frightened when he grabbed her by the wrist with a hand that felt frozen and stony, like the hand of a dead man.
The documentarian has the greatest storytelling challenge of any filmmaker, because he or she has to take a huge amount of information and characters and events and draw a relatively straight narrative line through it. The choice made by Marquez—to imagine a whole outside context for this story of some guy making an exhaustive investigation into this event via interviews, anecdotes, paperwork—is amazingly effective. And he uses it with such a light touch. It reminds me of all those novels from the 19th century that claim to have been compiled from letters found in mysterious diaries and stuff, just because it was in vogue at the time to pretend you found your story instead of creating it in your own head. I like these kinds of techniques, because they don’t fence in the story. This one bleeds out in all directions. It’s saturated with context, with different paths, with inner lives. In short, it’s wonderful.