Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 98 votes)
5 stars
35(36%)
4 stars
33(34%)
3 stars
30(31%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
98 reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
"The magic is only in what books say, how they stitched the patches of the universe together into one garment for us."

I'm surprised this book wasn't required reading while I was in high school, a hiatus in my curriculum which is probably the reason why I got to this party so late. You all know what this book is about, even I knew what it was about before reading it, so I'll skip immediately to my ponderings while I was reading this book. Have a look at the perfectly innocent picture below, of a sunny day in the park:



It's difficult to claim this book is a dystopia and not part of current reality. As Beatty, the Fire Captain and main antagonist, states: there is no need to burn books if people are generally not paying attention to them anyway, being distracted by artificial surroundings that are specifically designed to that end. Just look at the image I took yesterday in the park and try to find a book in the scenery. You won't find a single one. You might think some people are carrying an e-reader but you're wrong. What you're seeing is people having gathered around a Pokemon hotspot, trying to capture cartoon creatures in a cartoon world, eating cartoon candies and fighting cartoon fights.

Before you think I'm being condescending, let me clearly state that I'm not immune. I had installed that same game on my phone as well, breeding eggs and hunting electro-mice and pyro-salamanders. But the immensely sad image of the people gathered around a lifeless fountain that almost gave up on gushing altogether for nobody is watching it anyway, combined with the timely reading of this book made me reconsider that particular life-choice. Books aren't burnt up, but the time that could be spent reading them is, through inane distractions that lure the mind to slide ever downward. To my great alarm it seems that more often than not the mind is very willing to let that happen.

Luckily there is a garden of Eden, in which communities such as Goodreads can thrive. In that sense this community is very reminiscent of the one living in the wilderness outside of the cold city described in this book. A community of people who value talking about the meaning of things rather than just the things, to try and catch glimpses of the bigger picture, to patch up the universe as referred to in the quote that opened this review. Will this garden of Eden ever grow out of its protective wall and become an unstoppable jungle taking over all minds and hearts? I doubt it. It will always be more subtle. But I also believe it will never be destroyed.

In case you were wondering why I didn't rate this book more highly despite its timeless and important message, the reason is aptly illustrated by the following excerpt:

"And what lights the sun? Its own fire. And the sun goes on, day after day, burning and burning. The sun and time. The sun and time burning. Burning. The river bobbled him along gently. Burning. The sun and every clock on the earth. It all came together and became a single thing in his mind. After a long time of floating on the land and a short time of floating in the river he knew why he must never burn again in his life. The sun burned every day. It burned Time. The world rushed in a circle and turned on its axis and time was busy burning the years and the people anyway, without any help from him. So if he burnt things with the firemen, and the sun burnt Time, that meant everything burned!

Bradbury's "powerful and poetic prose" annoyed me greatly. To see pages filled with paragraphs that have the same word in them at every beginning, middle and ending of a sentence was too much to take at times. I have an allergy to repetitions, no matter how great their artistic potential, and this book contained many of them. I can see how this can create a certain melodious, dreamy effect, but it didn't fit with the predominantly cold theme (despite all the burning) of the book and most certainly did not with my brainwaves. The saddest part is that there are some beautiful ideas in there. I liked the image of "time burning away" so much I used it in this very review. But it got strangled by too much of the author's self-indulgence. Whenever Bradbury burst out in another one of his songs I found myself wishing he'd just get to the point already, seeing my wish fulfilled only two tedious pages later. This for me brought down the book a great deal, for it broke immersion and created a stand-off between myself, who instinctively resisted being swept away by what felt like experimental word play, and an author who could not resist employing it.

Two big, shining stars for idea and vision, but three have been burnt up and spent while the author was busy weaving webs of words that found this reader frustrated, entangled in those webs almost every page of the way.

This review can be read in conjunction with Alex' review, with which I share many points, particularly regarding to character development, minus the severe conclusion.
April 25,2025
... Show More
An absolute anti-utopian classic of the 20th century. I did a speech about that book in class (in 1988 I guess) to convince the other pupils how important this books is. The temperature at which books burn. No slowdown, only highspeed on the streets, reality shows at home with you being part of it, a world dominated by a government given truth. What happens if someone dares to look behind the scenes? Dares to read a uncensored book? Who is this group trying to find the truth beyond the fact falsifying system of the government? This is a must read. Ray Bradbury had a look into our modern times when he wrote this groundbraking classic. One of the best books of the 20th century!
April 25,2025
... Show More
This book made me realize I have not taken advantage of the gift that is public libraries. So much information and knowledge at our fingertips for free in an age where everything is behind a paywall

I’ve been thinking about how interesting it is that at some point in time, maybe when I finally was out of school at 21, maybe 8 months ago, I don’t know, I had a complete change of opinion on the importance of reading. from a young student just trying to score well on a test using short term memorization alone, to adult me trying to drink up and permanently store the heart and essence of books like Fahrenheit 451 in my brain forever. I didn’t take this type of reading seriously in Lit classes and never stopped to question why certain books had been hand selected for us to read and study. Never too late to start reading critically, as long as you start

My favorite lines from the Exiled Professor Granger: “You’re not important. You’re not anything. Someday the load we carry with us may help someone. But even when we had the books on hand a long time ago, we didn’t use what we got out of them…we’re going to meet a lot of lonely people soon, and when they ask us what we’re doing, you can say: We’re remembering.”

and also: “stuff your eyes with wonder. Live as if you’d drop dead in ten seconds. See the world. it’s more fantastic than any dream made or paid for in factories.”

“The magic is only in what books say, how they stitched the patches of the universe together into one garment for us.”

I also loved (and grimaced at) the completely accurate prediction on Bradbury’s behalf of a mindless consumerist society incapable of saving itself from looming nuclear annihilation. “Whirl man’s mind around so fast under the pumping hands of publishers, exploiters, broadcasters that the centrifuge flings off all unnecessary, time-wasting thought!” I have to delete tiktok and instagram FREEE MEEEEEEEE
April 25,2025
... Show More
Muy buen libro. Ray Bradbury se ha ganado mi más completa admiración.

Las distopías son ficción, a nadie le gustaría vivir en ellas, pero ¿somos conscientes de que nuestra forma de vivir poco a poco se va pareciendo cada vez más a las historias relatadas en este tipo de libros? ¿Somos conscientes de que el frenetismo nos está arrebatando nuestra alma?

El mensaje de este libro me ha gustado mucho, y me parece bastante interesante tanto para analizar como para reflexionar. No se convierte en mi distopía favorita porque creo que ese lugar de privilegio lo seguirá manteniendo por mucho tiempo, Un mundo feliz de Aldoux Huxley; sin embargo, siento que las críticas que expresa el autor, hacia lo que él cree que está mal en el mundo, son mensajes muy valiosos que no deberían quedar en el olvido. No por nada este libro es tan nombrado, no por nada el autor es tan laureado, no por nada este libro después de 70 años sigue manteniéndose vigente.

Infelicidad, vigilancia extrema, mentes saturadas de información, falta de libertad de expresión, control total de una sociedad ignorante, tecnología, ciencia ficción, libros, incendios... estos y más temas son muy protagonistas en esta distopía, que recomiendo leer sí o sí. La prosa no es sencilla al inicio, pero solo un poco de concentración basta para capturar la esencia del mensaje que nos quiere transmitir el autor.

La calificación aun la estoy pensando, decidiré sobre ese tema cuando realice la reseña completa más adelante.
April 25,2025
... Show More
"We are living in a time when flowers are trying to live on flowers, instead of growing on good rain & black loam." (111)

What outstanding prose--prophetic, which is by far the most rare and inspiring of attributes a work of literature can ever possess. & Ray "I Don't Talk Things, Sir. I Talk The Meaning Of Things" Bradbury is here at his absolute best. I cannot decide whether this or "Martian Chronicles" is my favorite... they are definitely my favorite of his, the best possible possibly in ANY sci-fi adventure.

This is "The Giver" for adults. Here, another example of overpraised books that shockingly do live up to the hype. It's a resplendent petition for life, beauty, & literature; an AMEN for The Book's very core of existence... THE BOOK that actually worships other BOOKS (like The Bible does with God). Personal events and not the battlefields of Tolkien-sized scope (I mean small occurrences such as breakdowns, unpleasant jobs, below-par relationships...) tightens the razor-sharp string of terror; a severe lack of details is a tenacious and masterful way to portray this post-apocalyptic nightmare in the most disconcerting way. (If you're a lover of books, this seems like some Dantean form of poetic retribution!)

"451" is an example of when planets aligned just right and gave the writer a light for him to share. This, a writer's "capacity for collecting metaphors" is absolutely enthralling. I am wholly amazed!

A PLUS: read the edition with the 3 introductions by the inspiring Bradbury (there are 451 printings or so of this novel after all) & save a couple bucks in a creative writing class. His writing tips are genuinely far-out!
April 25,2025
... Show More
the way you can tell this was written by a man is he writes a teenage girl who walks alone at night and voluntarily begins a conversation with a male stranger
April 25,2025
... Show More
Can you imagine this terrifying future? We wouldn’t have goodreads! I’m crying just thinking about it. And the world is so desperate for anything to defeat the numb pointless existence that they partake in dangerous activities like driving at excessive speeds through crowded neighborhoods.

In a world without art and fiction the value of life is non-existent. This book explicitly demonstrates that art and creativity is what makes us human. Denying expression is denying humanity.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Venía con expectativas bajas y resultó todo un éxito para mí, porque el libro dejó mucho que desear en algunos aspectos y en otros no tanto.

En realidad es un 2.5

Farenheit 451 es una distopía donde la sociedad estadounidense del futuro ha prohibido los libros y el gobierno tiene de su parte a los bomberos; quiénes en vez de apagar incendios los provocan, pero dirigido única y exclusivamente a la quema de libros. La trama suena interesante y a día de hoy comprendo perfectamente que el libro tiene un valor literario indudable. Es bastante visionario en algunos ámbitos y resulta triste en cierto modo que algunos de los temas propuestos puedan verse reflejados en nuestro día a día.

Lo que me gustó: las temáticas.

Esto es lo único que yo puedo salvar dentro de mi lectura. Es lo poco que me ha gustado y que subyace como múltiples mensajes entre las líneas, ya que el futuro propuesto está lleno de detalles que nutren y dan diversidad.

El concepto de la quema de libros y la censura en general para impedir ideas revolucionarias en contra a la norma regida; la curiosidad en el protagonista por aquellos objetos que contienen letras en su interior y el porqué se destruyen, una clara referencia al ser humano como alguien dispuesto a saber más y obtener conocimientos. Así mismo el porqué hay personas que se niegan a dejar perder sus libros considerando muy valioso el contenido de ellos. El gobierno como un ente opresor y de máxima autoridad con habitantes sometidos y acorralados; la eliminación total del libre pensamiento, e incluso las conversaciones entre vecinos, amigos y/o familiares; donde se sustituye el pensar y la comunicación con los demás por una clase de vida donde prima el consumismo y la desconexión lo que permite la idiotización de las personas a través de la industria de las comunicaciones, que bombardean continuamente con información manipulada. La felicidad y las relaciones como algo desechable.

En fin, muchos mensajes por extraer. Y hacia el final es sublime el clímax que te entrega otro último mensaje; la reflexión que se da sobre la importancia de un libro y su contenido a nivel histórico como algo que perdura y marca la humanidad, sin la necesidad de estar escrito sobre el papel.

Lo que no me gustó: el aspecto narrativo.

Esto es esencialmente para mí el punto flojo. Lo primero que me cruzó por la mente una vez llegué al final es que es demasiado corta para mi gusto, sentí que no hubo el desarrollo adecuado del personaje mismo; quien tiene una catarsis emocional demasiado rápida para la trama. Los sucesos van pasando uno tras otro a una velocidad alarmante y la capacidad mía como lector, de empatizar con Montag (personaje principal) fue nula; al igual que con los demás personajes que van apareciendo.

Esto me lleva a confirmar otra cosa, que la narración es caótica a veces. La mente del protagonista es un enjambre de pensamientos y frases que a veces se hacen difíciles de comprender. Pero sobre todo me hizo darme cuenta de que la atmósfera del libro no me transmitió nada ni los mismos personajes se me hicieron humanos o atractivos. Las situaciones y los problemas por los que pasaban me producían gran indiferencia.

Subjetivamente valoro demasiado que un libro me transmita algo y logre generarme emociones, cosa que este no logró en ningún momento. Ni con la prosa, ni con la atmósfera, ni con los diálogos, ni con los personajes. Con nada. Hay frases muy bonitas y bastantes figuras literarias para adornar la narración. Bonitas y con mensajes intrínsecos, pero lastimosamente nada más.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Ray Bradbury's classic, Fahrenheit 451, was published in 1953. Over 40 years ago, it was required reading at my school. It's a dystopian novel that has huge applicability today. It impacted me many decades ago and I wanted to read it again.

The main character, Montag, is a fireman with his symbolic helmet that says Fahrenheit 451---the temperature at which book paper catches fire and burns. Firefighters are called to burn houses, books, and if need be, people, because books are banned.

Below are passages from the book that resonated with me as well as three songs that came to mind with specific passages.

* You never stop to think what I've asked you.

* Do you ever read any of the books you burn?

* Are you happy?

* What do you talk about?

* Nobody knows anyone.

* Do you notice how people hurt each other these days?

* My uncle says his grandfather remembered when children didn't kill each other.

* Nobody says anything different from anyone else.

* There was a list of one million forbidden books.

* When burning books, you weren't hurting anyone, you were hurting only things.

* There was nothing to tease your conscience later.

* How do you get so empty?

* Nobody listens anymore. (Reminds me of Demi Lovato's song, Anyone. Lyrics below)

ANYONE
I tried to talk to my piano
I tried to talk to my guitar
Talk to my imagination
Confided into alcohol
I tried and tried and tried some more
Told secrets 'til my voice was sore
Tired of empty conversation
'Cause no one hears me anymore

A hundred million stories
And a hundred million songs
I feel stupid when I sing
Nobody's listening to me
Nobody's listening
I talk to shooting stars
But they always get it wrong
I feel stupid when I pray
So, why am I praying anyway?
If nobody's listening

Anyone, please send me anyone
Lord, is there anyone?
I need someone, oh
Anyone, please send me anyone
Lord, is there anyone?
I need someone

I used to crave the world's attention
I think I cried too many times
I just need some more affection
Anything to get me by

A hundred million stories
And a hundred million songs
I feel stupid when I sing
Nobody's listening to me
Nobody's listening
I talk to shooting stars
But they always get it wrong
I feel stupid when I pray
Why the fuck am I praying anyway?
If nobody's listening

Anyone, please send me anyone
Lord, is there anyone?
I need someone, oh
Anyone, please send me anyone
Oh, Lord, is there anyone?
I need someone
Oh, anyone, I need anyone
Oh, anyone, I need someone

A hundred million stories
And a hundred million songs
I feel stupid when I sing
Nobody's listening to me
Nobody's listening

Demi Lovato, Anyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ixVd...

* How long has it been since you were really bothered? About something important, about something real?

* We must all be alike.

* Firefighters who burn books are custodians of our peace of mind.

* Books say nothing.

* The world is starving and we're well fed. Is that why we're hated so much?

* I saw the way things were going, a long time back. I said nothing. I'm one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the "guilty," but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself.

* Books are hated and feared because they show the pores of life.

* When you've got nothing to lose, you run any risk you want. (Reminds me of Kris Kristofferson's lyrics to Me and Bobby McGee: Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.)

* Books are to remind us what asses and fools we are.

* The only way the average chap will see ninety-nine percent of the world is through books.

* A little learning is a dangerous thing.

* The dignity of truth is lost without much protesting.

* Live as if you would drop dead in ten seconds. (Reminds me of Tim McGraw's song, Live Like You Were Dying: Someday I hope you get the chance to live like you were dying.)

Fahrenheit 451 is shockingly prophetic and frightening with its implications.

Highly recommend reading or re-reading it!
April 25,2025
... Show More
“A book is a loaded gun.” – Ray Bradbury

“We need to make books cool again. If you go home with somebody, and they don’t have books, don’t fuck ‘em!” – John Waters


This is going to be a review/rant and there might be spoilers.

One day, I was at the hair salon getting my mop splattered in bright pink hair dye. I can’t wear headphones with all that colored goop on my head, so obviously, I always bring a book and try to ignore the (usually) loud and (often) inane conversations I overhear as I wait for the color to set. Alas, hair salons are rarely temples of highbrow philosophy. I think I was reading an Atwood novel on that particular evening, when I overheard one of the hairdressers talking to her client. She was saying something like: “I can’t see the point of reading. I mean, if I have some free time, I don’t want to have to think, you know?”. As luck would have it, my hairdresser chose that moment to offer me a gin and tonic. I asked for a double, and homicide was averted (we often fault alcohol for the bad behavior it can result in; I say give it more credit for all the times it helped some people avoid beating an idiot to a pulp with a hairdryer).

I don’t know that other hairdresser well enough to pass judgment, but those words made me tense up and clench my hands into fists. To me, her words meant: “Why think when you can be satisfied by entertainment? Why think when (unreliable) media give you pre-chewed (potentially erroneous) information on important topics? Why think when someone else might do it for you?” I bet she’d have been fine in Bradbury’s imaginary near-future America. Content. Or too stupefied with vacuous entertainment to bother thinking about it…

I am not the first person to read this book and to look around only to find that we are living more and more in Bradbury’s nightmare, glued to screens at all times, neglectful of true human relationships, disconnected from our minds and our imagination. He was afraid of the media being controlled by the government, of people caring more about being entertained than about being informed, of humans being so disconnected from each other - even from those closest to them - that seeing someone suffer before their eyes made them feel nothing.

Guy Montag is a fireman, but not the kind we know. Books having long been banned by the government, owning them is now a criminal act, and Guy’s squad’s job is to set fire to the possessions of those who are found owning books. He meets a teenage girl named Clarisse, who seems strange to Guy at first: she doesn’t care to watch the parlor wall, the enormous television screen most people are hopelessly addicted to, preferring to be outside, thinking and talking about things that he had never thought about himself. A few days after meeting Clarisse, Guy is called upon to burn down an old woman’s house: rather than live to see her books being burnt, she sets herself on fire and dies as her home is being ransacked. In the confusion and chaos, Guy steals a book from that woman’s collection. And it turns out its not the first book he smuggled back home...

I originally read this book about ten years ago, and I had forgotten the way Bradbury perfectly illustrates the quiet desperation of Guy and Mildred’s dull life, notably through the casual attitude of the paramedics who rescue suicide attempts ten times a day. Clarisse does have a bit of the manic pixie dream girl thing going on, which is grating, but also charming because she represents a liveliness that is tragically absent from Guy’s hollow life. I had also forgotten how intriguing the ambiguous Captain Beatty is: a clearly very well-read man who has been indoctrinated by the powers that be... but has he? Would he have hunted Guy or was he trying to liberate him in a way he himself could never be? The final metaphor about how we come to embody the books we read and love is simply perfect.

If you are reading this, it’s safe to assume you love reading as much as I do. I’ve been told by someone that I fetishize books, and while they meant it as something weird, I have long embraced that fetish. Reading is definitely about the words; but I’d be lying if I told you I took no pleasure in the act of touching the pages, smelling the inimitable perfume of ink and binding glue, running my fingers along the spines of the books on my shelves and admiring those shelves the way I would a lovely painting or artwork. They are objects of infinite beauty, filled with knowledge, memories, wonder, unknown worlds and ideas to explore and beautiful language to swirl around in one’s mind, like good wine in a glass. No image horrifies me quite as much as the thought of burning books.

I have the 60th anniversary edition, with a brilliant introduction by Neil Gaiman, and plenty of essays at the end about the context in which the book was written and the many reasons it is still a relevant and significant work; all this additional material is quite worth the time to explore, especially Bradbury's own essay about why he wrote science-fiction and the coda to "Fahrenheit 451".

A lyrical and chilling book. No, it’s probably not Bradbury’s best book (though it remains my favorite for sentimental reasons). No, paper doesn’t actually burn at 451 degrees Fahrenheit. Yes, the characters are underdeveloped. Yes, it is occasionally didactic, the pacing is sometimes rushed and Bradbury wasn’t super good at predicting some aspects of the future (sci-fi is a thought experiment, not meteorology). But it is an important reminder that we are still lucky to have the freedom to read and to think – and that it can be taken away if we don’t use that freedom. It makes me proud to be that weird girl, sitting in a corner of the break room with her book. A must-read, in the same league as “1984” and “Brave New World”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG38V...

-

Reading “Fahrenheit 451”, I was reminded of a very strange play by Amélie Nothomb titled “Human Rites” (“Les Combustibles” in the original French - which makes a lot more sense), where she takes a similar idea and spins it on its head: set in a cold country under siege (Eastern Europe is implied), a small cast of characters have burned everything they own to keep warm, and eventually, the only combustibles they have left are their books. In such a situation, which book would you refrain from burning, and possibly sacrifice your comfort and life for? The play is far from perfect (probably one of her weakest works, honestly), but it is an interesting exercise of thought, as it can be interpreted to be about many things: the importance of culture and literature, certainly, but also their price – on many levels. In the play, the more books are burnt, the more animalistic and inhuman the characters get. As the symbols of their culture and civilization vanishes in the flames, so does civilized behavior...
April 25,2025
... Show More
- ديستوبيا كتبت في بداية خمسينيات القرن الماضي، ربما كان الهدف منها تحذيرياً وربما كانت محاولة لوقف هذا التحول وتجنبه لكن في كلتا الحالتين فنحن نعيش في الكثير من التفاصيل الباردة التي وردت في هذه الرواية الخيالية!

- تجري احداث الرواية في مدينة امريكية ما، حيث يتم تقديم مدينة تمنع امتلاك وقراءة الكتب، مدينة حوّلت رجال الإطفاء الى رجال حرائق يسعون خلف الكتاب ويحرقونه، مدينة تحوّلت الى محمية صناعية (بفعل الجدار العازل)، حيطان بيوتها شاشات تلفزة واتصالات (وهذا استشراف ممتاز من الكاتب)، جوها متقلب بشكل مرضي، علاقات الناس باردة ومصطنعة، وذاكرتهم ضعيفة.

- الأحداث تجري في ثلاثة فصول من الكتاب حيث يقوم القسم الأول بتقديم الإطفائي "مونتاغ"، عمله وعائلته والتقائه بكلاريس، تتطور هذه الشخصية من حارقة للكتب الى محبة ومخبأة لها. تدخل شخصيات اخرى كـ "فابر" العجوز ورئيس الإطفائيين اللذان يؤثران بشكل كبير على مونتاغ ويكونان سبباً فيما سيقوم به.

- السرد عادي، التشويق قليل، الفكرة ممتازة، الوصف عظيم، التحول النفسي للشخصية كان مميزاً ايضاً رغم الترجمة السيئة التي لم تستطع نقل الهذيان والصراع النفسي الذي كان يجري داخل "مونتاغ".

- الترجمة: من اسوء الترجمات التي قرأتها يوماً، على سبيل المثال: مشاعل ملتهبة (وليس "ملتهية" ص15)، لم تكن الغرفة خالية (وليس "الفرقة" ص20)، أحس بشفتيه تتحركان وتلامسان سماعة الهاتف (وليس "تلاسمان" ص23)، يأتي غرباء وينتهكونك(وليس "ينتهونك" ص26)، مع ان الخطوط (وليس"من"ص180)، أدرك لماذا لا يجوز له (وليس "يجوزو"ص192)... بعض الجمل: "سارا في ليل الهبّات الدافئة-الباردة على الرصيف المفضض"، " يستمع الى القهقهات الآتية من تحت والخمش الوتير لأقدام الجرذان الراكضة والعياء الكمنجاتي للفئران"!!!!! هل هذه ترجمة؟!

- في مقابلة مع الكاتب ذكر سبب كتابته للرواية:
"لقد كتبت هذا الكتاب في الوقت الذي كنت فيه قلقاً بشأن الطريقة التي تسير بها الأمور في هذا البلد منذ أربع سنوات. الكثير من الناس كانوا خائفين من ظلالهم ؛ كان هناك تهديد بحرق الكتاب. العديد من الكتب كانت تؤخذ من الرفوف في ذلك الوقت. وبالطبع تغيرت الأمور كثيرًا خلال أربع سنوات. الأمور بدأت تعود في اتجاه صحي للغاية. لكن في ذلك الوقت أردت أن أقوم بنوع من القصة حيث يمكنني التعليق على ما يمكن أن يحدث لبلد ما إذا تركنا أنفسنا في هذا الاتجاه ، حيث يتوقف كل التفكير ، ويبتلع التنين ذيله ، وندمر أنفسنا من خلال هذا النوع من العمل."

وبذلك فإن بذور الرواية كانت موجودة على أرض الواقع وقام برادبري بزرعها على الورق منتجاً هذا العمل، لكن اذا كانوا في الغرب قد اجتنبوه فنحن نعيشه في الشرق حيث تسيطر وسائل الإعلام المرئية على المجتمعات، صحف عريقة تتوقف، الكتب مرمية في الزوايا وقلائل من يقرأون، الكتب السيئة معروضة في المعارض او مروّج لها بشكل كبير (أنا لا اغمز من قناة اي جائزة :) )، أكثر الكتب مبيعاً كتب الطبخ والأبراج!!... الخ
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.