...
Show More
This is going to be a joint review of all three of Nick Hornby's collections of Believer columns.
First off, I need to say I'm deeply relieved that Nick Hornby can write nonfiction, and that's it's just Fever Pitch that is miserable. I was a little worried.
Secondly, you should not read these books if you do not want your list of books to read to grow significantly. While is is part of the Believer's schtick that reviews must be positive (the books he doesn't like must only be referred to anonymously), his enthusiasm for the books he writes about is infectious.
It's also nice to see the reviews written in a context of the books being read. He doesn't go into great detail of plot, characters, or themes. He just talks about things he liked in the book, to the degree of depth he needs to get his point across, and moves on. He also talks about himself and the experience of reading the book.
He also lists the books he bought at the start of each column, not all of which get read. It's reassuring to see the dashed intentions of wanting to give the books your love, but just not having enough time or devotion.
I read this book first, accidentally out of order. I read it over a couple commutes, while I read the other two in a day each, while I traveled to and from Cleveland. The first two books (Polysyllabic Spree and this one) have excerpts from a few of his favorite books, and the last one (Shakespeare Wrote for Money) has an introduction by Sarah Vowell. It's not enough to warrant a purchase if you were a devoted Believer reader, but is a nice touch.
He's stopped doing the column, but I suppose I've been given enough book suggestions to fill a few years now.
First off, I need to say I'm deeply relieved that Nick Hornby can write nonfiction, and that's it's just Fever Pitch that is miserable. I was a little worried.
Secondly, you should not read these books if you do not want your list of books to read to grow significantly. While is is part of the Believer's schtick that reviews must be positive (the books he doesn't like must only be referred to anonymously), his enthusiasm for the books he writes about is infectious.
It's also nice to see the reviews written in a context of the books being read. He doesn't go into great detail of plot, characters, or themes. He just talks about things he liked in the book, to the degree of depth he needs to get his point across, and moves on. He also talks about himself and the experience of reading the book.
He also lists the books he bought at the start of each column, not all of which get read. It's reassuring to see the dashed intentions of wanting to give the books your love, but just not having enough time or devotion.
I read this book first, accidentally out of order. I read it over a couple commutes, while I read the other two in a day each, while I traveled to and from Cleveland. The first two books (Polysyllabic Spree and this one) have excerpts from a few of his favorite books, and the last one (Shakespeare Wrote for Money) has an introduction by Sarah Vowell. It's not enough to warrant a purchase if you were a devoted Believer reader, but is a nice touch.
He's stopped doing the column, but I suppose I've been given enough book suggestions to fill a few years now.