...
Show More
If you are a fan of Willeford, one of the most underrated of crime novelists in America, despite the films ("Cockfighter," and "Miami Blues") made from his work, then this novel will appeal to you. There is irreverent humor that will make the book and its story vivid and immediate for interested readers. If you have never encountered Willeford, "Miami Blues" might be a good place to start. It's too bad there aren't more Hoke Moseley novels, for his account of life as a Miami detective is true to its era (1980s Reagan America) and to the craft of good novel-writing. The characters, one of whom is a sociopath who really knows his own psychology, are a rich array of the citizens of a city that has changed a great deal in the decades since Charles Willeford made it come alive. Quirky, with a restless intellect ever at play, Willeford is, like Jim Thompson, a writer only America and its ironies could have produced.
I know that it is time to reassess just how police/crime novels function in the second decade of the 21st century, for the policeman is, even if honest and enlightened, still a source of justifiable fear to many Americans. Hoke Moseley is no racist cop, however, just a clear-eyed (and honest) portrayal of what it means to want to enhance justice rather than dispense it as a sometimes murderous corrective. Hope that's not too vague, and I would be willing to engage in a discussion with anyone else who realizes that some police procedurals are overdue to be re-assessed in light of the events of police "overzealousness" and displaced fear leading to outright murder of ordinary citizens during a period that has gone on too long. Willeford does not glorify police excesses in any way, and I think instead offers some insight to what makes law enforcement such a chancy and disordered proposition in our society.
I know that it is time to reassess just how police/crime novels function in the second decade of the 21st century, for the policeman is, even if honest and enlightened, still a source of justifiable fear to many Americans. Hoke Moseley is no racist cop, however, just a clear-eyed (and honest) portrayal of what it means to want to enhance justice rather than dispense it as a sometimes murderous corrective. Hope that's not too vague, and I would be willing to engage in a discussion with anyone else who realizes that some police procedurals are overdue to be re-assessed in light of the events of police "overzealousness" and displaced fear leading to outright murder of ordinary citizens during a period that has gone on too long. Willeford does not glorify police excesses in any way, and I think instead offers some insight to what makes law enforcement such a chancy and disordered proposition in our society.