Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 98 votes)
5 stars
42(43%)
4 stars
26(27%)
3 stars
30(31%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
98 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
Voted #5 of 100 best mysteries of all time by Mystery Writers of America (www.mysterywriters.org) and see also World Magazine January 12/19, 2008, pg. 27).
_________________________
I found this at a used book sale for $1. Remembering that it was brilliant and I wanted to read it again with the murderer in mind, I decided to buy and read it once more and then sell it. I recalled that I had a severe caution on it, but thought I could just scan through the parts that were too spicy.

However, living in Rusty Sabich's head was so smutty and disgusting -- I just couldn't get through it again. I skipped to the end to certain parts that intrigued me. Now I am completely ready to wash this book right out of my hair and send it on it's way. I just haven't quite decided how to do it yet. I hate to junk it, but I don't feel I can sell it...maybe i'll donate it to the library.

In the end, I appreciate the writing, but the grime is too much. I cannot even get through the book a second time! I'm downgrading to 2 stars. I'll allow that for the amazing plot, and the writing is quite good, but all the surrounding gunk renders this a disappointing read.

_______________________
WOW. WOW. WOW.

Okay, disclaimers first. This book went beyond gritty to dirty. The "F" word is a standard part of the vocab of most all characters throughout. The Lord's name is taken in vain repeatedly. Masturbation, oral sex (often coerced), and anal sex are all described at some point. Yuk. This book is not for the faint of heart, and there are many times when i asked myself, should i even keep on reading this?

So why am i even confessing I finished?

Because, the plot was thick and intriguing. The main character, fascinating in his internal processing (okay, not on all subjects). And, with a title like "Presumed Innocent" you are looking all around to see who you think it is that committed the murder. I never suspected the outcome. i was completely blind sided (twice!) in the last few chapters. In the end, it is explained (with a couple of different nuances), and it was all there the entire time. An unbiased look at the evidence should have made it obvious. But i didn't see it. WOW. But, a cautious WOW.

Other high points were the section on the protagonist's appeals to God (insightful into how most unbelievers interact with Him). And numerous insights into the legal/ political process.

I want to recommend it, but.... the negatives are incredibly flagrant. The modern novel really is depressing that way, the trash i mean. Who wants to read that in 100 years? But I suppose it an accurate representation of the world as some see it.

For #4 of 100 best mysteries of all time by Mystery Writers of America (www.mysterywriters.org) and see also World Magazine January 12/19, 2008, pg. 27), see
The Daughter of Time, Jospehine Tey, 1949
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
April 17,2025
... Show More
Presumed Innocent was published in 1987. This is another one of those twenty-five year old books that I seem to read frequently and some say is quite dated. I remember those days pretty well; I was in graduate school at SUNY at Stony Brook on Long Island. It was after computers but before cell phones. In my mind I can be living in the 1980s!

What happens when a top lawyer in the office of the prosecuting attorney is charged with murder? Presumed Innocent is about an experienced lawyer being prosecuted and helping to prepare his own defense. The first third of the book is the story of the events leading up to the trial. The remaining two-thirds is about the trial. The author is an attorney who knows about trials from his personal experience of participating in actual trials.

This is a long book: four hundred thirty one pages. Our defendant, Rusty Sabich, struggles through a long trial that is told to the reader in significant detail including the personalities of the judge, the prosecuting attorneys, the defense attorneys, and several of the witnesses. About three-quarters of the way through the book, my interest and involvement in the trial peaked but I knew that there was another one hundred pages to go. I am impatient for a conclusion and am annoyed that I have been brought to this moment too early by the author. My feelings may replicate the feelings of the defendant, an interesting aspect of the book. But I am not sure that this is a feeling in the reader that the author should desire since it seems quite possible that early climactic moments might cause the reader to lose interest and stop reading before the end. For me, the considerable number of unknowns keeps me reading even when I believe that the high will likely change into a low before rising up again for the actual conclusion.

But I find that I did not have enough confidence in the skill of author Scott Turow. He understands the lows that may follow significant highs. His protagonist says, “And my initial euphoria is long past, given way to a suppressed melancholy.” I am sorry, Mr. Turow, that I doubted you. For there are several concluding events necessitated by the many strands of the story. It all did leave me feeling satisfied and entertained, good feelings for the end of a mystery novel.

Since this is a book published twenty-five years ago,you want to say, sure, it’s missing the DNA evidence. And so it is. But Presumed Innocent has some staying power. It is still a good read that many years later. Eighty-three GR readers have reviewed this book so far in 2012. I am not sure what qualifies a book in the mystery genre to be called a classic but a 3.99 average in 29,278 (well, 279 now) ratings means people like it. I guess I am just your average reader since I give it 3.99 stars!

It is interesting to note that there is a follow up book  Innocent  published 22 years later (2010) with many of the same characters. That one is on my TBR shelf along with most of the other Turow books.
April 17,2025
... Show More
‘Presumed Innocent’ by Scott Turow is very literary in tone because of the main character’s internal monologues and his mournful story narration. Chief Prosecutor Rusty Sabich tells of being accused and put on trial for the murder of his ex-lover Carolyn Polhemus. Rusty is married and has a seven-year-old son Nat. His guilt at betraying his wife Barbara and worrying about his son fuels his introspection. Why did he become so enamored with Carolyn Polhemus? The terror of what the future might be like even if he is not convicted does not prevent Rusty from emotionally whipping himself continuously with a very sad self-examination.

Raymond Horgan is losing the Kindle County voters in his election bid to keep his prosecuting attorney job which he has held for twelve years. Horgan’s opponent, Nico Della Guardia, wants Horgan’s job especially after being fired nine months ago by Rusty acting under orders from Horgan. Nico was a deputy prosecuting attorney working for Horgan and Rusty. Both Horgan and Nico are hoping for the mayor’s endorsement to boost their image with the voters.

Caught between the two campaigners, all Rusty wants is to keep his own chief prosecutor job without antagonizing either one of the competing lawyers. But when Carolyn’s body is discovered in her apartment, hogtied, possibly murdered by a blow to her head, Rusty is suddenly the number one suspect. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence pointing to Rusty. The truth is Rusty had been having a secret affair with Carolyn, but she had ghosted him four months ago. They both worked as deputy prosecutors in Horgan’s office, so it became obvious to Rusty she was definitely avoiding him by her evading him in meetings and being suddenly too busy for after-hour drinks. Rusty couldn’t stand it! He kept calling her, even breaking down in front of Barbara, his wife, which is how she finds out about Rusty’s obsession and affair with Carolyn.

Rusty is not going to get any husband-of-the-year recommendations from Barbara after that. The only bright spot in his life is Nathaniel. In public, Barbara plays the dutiful wife. In private - oh my. She always has been the emotionally colder one in their marriage, but now there is definitely a very icy rage boiling off from her. She is a mathematician going to university for her Ph.D., hoping to be a teacher.

The pressure to find out who really killed Carolyn is enormous. Rusty knows he has to keep his grief in check and figure it out. He thinks his marriage and job are toast, but it is important that Barbara stay on his side for Nat’s sake as well as for the reporters. Afterwards, he doesn’t know where to go or what he will do. But going to prison is definitely NOT the plan!

I was pleasantly surprised by Turow’s writing style! This book is not written in the typical bleak brusqueness or black comedy of most murder mysteries. Instead it felt like I was reading a literary memoir. I liked it.

The one quibble I had was the character of Barbara and how Rusty never saw her as ruthless and scary as I did! Omg, she hog-tied a dead body after murdering Carolyn! After Rusty figures it out, he lets her go with Nat! I'd be scared of her on so many levels! But Rusty was thinking he deserved her wrath, I guess. I think we need to recognize when murders are beyond the normal, run-of-the-mill rage/vengeance boundaries, and I think Barbara went WAY into mean girl, maybe even a touch psychopathic, territory!
April 17,2025
... Show More
I read this years ago and really liked it, mainly because the writing was so interesting and I didn't guess the twist ending ahead of time. That's a big plus in any book of this kind for me.
April 17,2025
... Show More
This is one of Turow's first legal thrillers, a category which he may have invented as far as I know. If that is your kinda thing, then Turow is your kind of writer. I found it a bit redundant and containing stereotypes and never went back to read it again. I believe it was made into a blockbuster movie with Harrison Ford in 1990. It may be that the film is better than the book but feel free to disagree in the comments!
April 17,2025
... Show More
now i am hooked. This was such a great, easy and creative book. i was hooked after the first page.

The characters were easy to fall in love with and follow, along with the story. the author made the mental visions so easy and vivid of the surroundings and the characters actions felt so real.

i would highly recommend this author and this book.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I recently re-read this, and it's still wonderful. The writing is sharp and brooding, and the plotting is superb.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Some lawyers should become writers, others should not. Scott Turow falls squarely in the latter category. Once you realize that half this novel can be skipped, as it is useless exposition about characters the author fails to make sympathetic in the first place, it becomes a much shorter read. Combine that with the fact that half the character descriptions border on, if not delve fully into, racism, it may not be worth reading at all. (I'm sure Turow would say it's the character speaking and not the author, but they are one in the same) My final complaint with the book is that around 1/3 of the way into it I thought, "He'd better not end it that way," and sure enough he draws this winding course just to bring things back to a terribly cliched, Law & Order ending, though without any of the talent or ability of the television writers.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Re-reading this for the first time in well over a decade in preparation for the third book in the trilogy. Wow, this is as good as legal thrillers get! Even remembering the details of this book we'll, I was completely captivated with the intricate plotting. Turow is a truly superior writer, and these characters are extraordinarily well-drawn and worthy of sequels. This book really holds up over time.
April 17,2025
... Show More
A book that felt like it took me an entire century to read. To be fair, I think we could have edited out about 100 pages of it.

However, well done, very well done. The ending surprised me.

What I’m looking most forward to is reading the other 2 in the trilogy as they seem to be written with a few or several years between the writing and I want to see Rusty age in real-time. I think I’ve heard that Presumed Guilty that was just released in January begins with Rusty being 77 years old. He is 40 in this book. My guess is that this will be an incredible character study to read the next 2 knowing that Turow is investing his own aging wisdom into Rusty for Presumed Guilty.

I will report back. Standby though because first I must soothe my Alaska obsession and read that passion away with a book about an Iditarod vet and Black Woods, Blue Sky by Eowyn Ivey and another about Wolves by Seth Kantner and maybe something by John McPhee.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Normally I like to read the book before watching the series but this time I did it backwards. I watched the show prior to reading this so I’m sure that that is influencing my thoughts on this book.

Honestly though, I think I preferred the show over the book this time but that’s not to say that this wasn’t still an enjoyable read. I picked up the books because I didn’t want to wait for the next season of the show, I wanted to know what happened next ASAP. Much to my chagrin, they’re incredibly different from one another. I found myself enjoying the rendition of the show a bit more. I will say that I appreciated the Rusty in this book seeming a bit more level-headed than the Rusty in the series. But I missed the extra characters and the twists that the series adapted.

It’s extremely difficult to review this without comparing the two. The pacing and structure was very different. The show focused more on the courtroom proceedings whereas the book focused more on the investigation leading up to the courtroom. I really enjoyed seeing the courtroom scenes in the series so for me that was deeply missed in this book.

I was also surprised that the actual murderer was completely different between these two renditions as well. I once again found the show’s choice of murderer more compelling than the book choice. The book choice felt more predictable to me and was less jarring. Had I read this book prior to watching the show, I know I probably would’ve appreciated it more. I still think this was a great book and I’ll continue to read on in the series, but the show adaptation just did it a little bit better in my eyes.

TW: rape, murder, sexual content, sexual violence, infidelity, toxic relationship, sexism, racism, injury detail, death, racial slurs, homophobia, blood, gun violence, violence
April 17,2025
... Show More
ما الأكثر صعوبة؟ معرفة الحقيقة أو العثور عليها. أو البَوح بها أو تصديقها؟
إذا ظننت أنك تعرف الإجابة فأبشرك بأن اجابتك خاطئة.
كانت وحيدة والدَيها. على غراري وعلى غرار نات. وشعرتْ بالظلم في أثناء نشأتها. كان اهتمام والديها بها خانقاً. واعتبرتْ أنه مزيَّف بطريقة ما. لقد ادّعت أنها كانت موجَّهة ومستغلَّة في كل الأوقات كأداة لتنفيذ رغباتهما وليس رغباتها. وكانت تقول لي في غالب الأحيان إنني الشخص الوحيد المماثل لها الذي قابلتْه. فأنا لا أشعر بالوحدة فحسب. بل أنا وحيد على الدوام. هل التبادل الحزين للحب يعني أنك تريد الحصول من الآخر على الدوام على ما تظن أنك تعطيه إياه؟ لقد أملت باربارا في أن أكون كأمير ما في قصص الخيال. عُلجوماً حوّلتْه بقبلاتها. يمكنه دخول الغابات المُظلمة حيث تُحتجز. ويقودها بعيداً. وعلى مَرّ السنوات. غالباً ما فشلتُ في هذه المهمة.
تخيل نفسك نجما لامعا في مقاطعتك يشار لك بالبنان كنائب المدعي العام و المرشح الأكثر جدارة لهذا اللقب بعد فوز المدعي العام بحكم المقاطعة. متزوج و لديك طفل صغير و بيت جميل و راتب محترم. تحقق في جريمة قتل حدثت لزميلة لك في المهنة و تجد الكثير من التشويش على الأدلة و لا توشك أبدا على معرفة القاتل أو تلمس الطريق إليه ثم تجد نفسك فجأة في قفص الاتهام لأنك أنت القاتل و تتحول من ممثل الادعاء للمتهم بالجريمة بين طرفة عين و انتباهتها! هل تخيلت ذلك؟ نعم؟ إذا فلنقرأ الرواية.
ومن الثابت في نظام القضاء الجنائي أن المتهَمين نادراً ما يقولون الحقيقة. وهو أمر مسلَّم به كقوانين الجاذبية. فرجال الشرطة والمدعون العامون. ومحامو الدفاع والقضاة. يعرفون أنهم يكذبون. هم يكذبون بوقار براحات أيدٍ متعرّقة ونظرات مرتبكة. أو بنظرة تلميذ بريء في غالب الأحيان. وبعدم تصديق ساخط عندما تهاجَم سذاجتهم. هم يكذبون لحماية أنفسهم. ويكذبون لحماية أصدقائهم. هم يكذبون لمجرد التسلية ليس إلا. أو لأن ذلك سلوكهم المعتاد. هم يكذبون في شأن تفاصيل كبيرة وصغيرة. وفي شأن من استهل العمل المخالف للقانون. ومن فكر به. ومن قام به. ومن شعر بالأسف. ولكنهم يكذبون. فالكذب على رجال الشرطة. والكذب على هيئة المحلفين التي تنظر في قضيّتكم. عقيدة المتهَم. وهم يكذبون على ضابط المراقَبة إذا اقتنعوا بذلك. ويسخرون من سلامة نيّتكم. فهناك أمر ما يتبدّل على الدوام.
في وسط هذه الأحداث الملتبسة يبدأ البطل عملية البحث عن القاتل مرة أخرى و لكن من مقاعد المتهمين لا مقاعد النيابة و ما أصعب الفرق. يشك في كل من حوله بداية من الضباط للقاضي لممثل الادعاء الجديد و يتصور أنها مؤامرة حيكت له في الظلام لأغراض ربما تكون سياسية.
«أنت تشك بأخلاق لارين. يجب أن تسامحني يا راستي. لحظات من الفلسفة فقط. ولكن ليس كل سوء تصرف بشري نتيجة عيوب فادحة في الأخلاق. فالظروف تلعب دورها أيضاً. التجربة. إذا سمحتَ بكلمة قديمة الطراز. عرفتُ لارين طوال مهنتي. وأقول لك إنه عانى الكثير. لقد تركه طلاقه في حالة من الفوضى. كان يتناول الشراب كثيراً. ويقامر. ودخل هذه العلاقة مع امرأة جميلة ووصولية. وحُطمت حياته المهنية. تخلى عن عادته عندما أصبح في أوج شهرته وحصل على مكافآت مالية. أنا على ثقة تامة بأنه أراد بهذا التغيير. والتعويض عن الانقلابات التي شهدتها حياته الشخصية. وبدلاً من ذلك. وجد نفسه مقيَّداً بعمل ثأري وسياسي في نطاق قضائي مُغرِق. وفاصلاً في مسائل غير ذات أهمية كبيرة. ولا علاقة لها بما اجتذبه إلى كرسي القضاء منذ البداية. لارين شخص ذو مقدرة عقلية كبيرة. ولكنه لم يسمع طوال سنوات سوى عن محاضر التجارة غير القانونية. وشغَب المشارب. والأمور التي تحصل في الغابة؛ وهي مسائل محيطة بالقضاء العام. وكل تلك القضايا تنتهي بالطريقة نفسها؛ بإخلاء سبيل المتّهَم. لا شيء سوى: أُقلفت القضية. مراقَبة قبل المحاكمة. مراقَبة بعد المحاكمة. ويعود المتّهَم على كل حال إلى منزله. وكان لارين في محيطٍ يعاني فساداً تاماً هو من أسرار المدينة الأكثر خطورة. رجال الكفالات. رجال الشرطة. ضباط المراقَبة. المحامون. كان الفرع الشمالي خليّة نحل من الصفقات المحظورة. هل تعتقد. يا راستي. أن لارين ليتل أول قاضٍ في دار قضاء الفرع الشمالي يقع على قارعة الطريق؟».
في النهاية لا يوجد عاقل يتوقع من منظومة العدالة أن تكشف الحقيقة سيما و ان اختلفنا على معنى الحقيقة ذاته. فالعدالة عمياء ليس فقط عن التحيزات و لكنها عمياء أيضا عن الحقيقة و يسهل التلاعب بها من كل الأطراف.
كدتُ أبلغ الأربعين من عمري. ولم يعد باستطاعتي الادعاء بأنني أجهل العالم. أو أن معظم ما رأيته يُعجبني. أنا ابن والدي. هذا هو إرثي؛ تلطُّخ النظرة المستقبلية حول وجود قسوة في الحياة أكثر مما يستوعبه العقلاء. لا أدّعي أنني تعرضتُ لمقدار كبير من المعاناة. ولكن مرّ عليّ الكثير. لقد رأيت روح والدي العرجاء التي أعطبتها إحدى أكبر الجرائم في التاريخ؛ رأيت العذاب والحاجة. والغضب العشوائي والانفعالي الذي يؤدي إلى سوء تصرف متنوّع ورهيب في شوارعنا. وكمدّع عام. عزمتُ على مكافحة هذه الأمور وإعلان نفسي عدوًّا لدوداً لأولئك الذين يرتكبون كل إساءة بالقوة والسلاح. ولكنني عجزتُ عن ذلك. بالطبع. فمن الذي يستطيع رؤية المقدرة السلبية تلك والاحتفاظ بأي شعور بالتفاؤل؟ لكان ذلك أسهل لو لم يكن العالم مليئاً بسوء الطالع العرَضي. غولان شارف. وهو أحد جيراني. لديه ابن وُلد ضريراً. وماك وزوجها غاصا في النهر في لحظة مرح بعد أن استدارا عند إحدى الزوايا. وحتى إن كان الحظ - والحظ فقط - يجنّبنا الأسوأ. فإن الحياة تُنهك العديدين منا. فالعديد من الرجال الصغار في السنّ من ذوي الكفاءات تفتر هممهم ويتقبّلون الواقع المرير. والنساء الصغيرات في السنّ النشيطات يحمِلنَ أطفالاً. ويصبحن أكثر سمنة عند الوركين. ويتقلّصنَ آملاتٍ في أثناء دنوّهنّ من منتصف العمر. لقد بدت لي كل حياة آنذاك. وعلى غرار كل نُدفة ثلج. فريدة بأشكال بؤسها وبندرة واعتدال مُتَعها. وتنطفئ الأضواء. وتسود العتمة. ولا يمكن للروح أن تتحمل هذا القدْر من الظلام. لقد مددتُ يدي إلى كارولين بتأنٍّ وعن قصد. لا يمكنني الادعاء بأن الأمر كان مجرد حادثة أو اكتشاف أشياء جميلة مصادَفةً. لقد حدث ما أردتُ أن يحدث. لقد حدث ما أردت القيام به. لقد مددتُ يدي إلى كارولين.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.