...
Show More
The knocks on Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything essentially come from two camps; those who are well versed in science and feel this treatment lacks any substantial depth or detail, and those whose interest in science is so nominal that they feel put upon by the overwhelming and substantial depth and detail. Such is the lot of authors who set out to bring complex disciplines to wider audiences (*see also Astrophysics For People In a Hurry). Speaking only for myself, this was right in my wheelhouse.
I now know a bit more about paleontology, geology, chemistry, astronomy and particle physics than I knew a few days ago, and I'm more than satisfied with the attention & treatment Bryson gives to my science of choice, physical anthropology. Light reading this is not, but you don't need a PhD to comprehend what Bill B is laying down, just a curious mind and a comfortable chair.
I now know a bit more about paleontology, geology, chemistry, astronomy and particle physics than I knew a few days ago, and I'm more than satisfied with the attention & treatment Bryson gives to my science of choice, physical anthropology. Light reading this is not, but you don't need a PhD to comprehend what Bill B is laying down, just a curious mind and a comfortable chair.