...
Show More
Obsession doesn't translate easily. Some people are lucky to find one thing to devote their entire attention to and be rewarded in its modicum, obscure though it may seem to others. A good writer excels in conjoining two obsessions, I feel. Love of language/communication and another thing. For the author here, the other thing is the genesis of food. The rapturous moment, in case of the metamorphosis of ingredient into food, comes only with an understanding of the cooks intent and it's successful effect.
Few people would have been able to devote the amount of obsession that Mr Buford does, and fewer still would be able to transpose the same curiosity and obsession onto the reader.
He alludes to his ability to shake off haute cuisines toxicities as coming from him being a tourist in this life. I believe it comes from having a surety of life independent of the business and on his character. Whats telling for me, is that toxic environments are created by people with big stakes and an inability to articulate their dependence on other people in failure and in success. Certainly in their orbits are people under similar stresses exhibiting none of the toxic behavior.
Principally, we look at Mario Batali and Dario Ceccini. In the journey we meet a lot more people in their orbits and the digressions are well structured and add to the book as a whole. It is tempting to use food imagery. Everything is well proportioned.
Some thoughts - certainly the obsession of food, the making of it and seeking perfection in the same is presented well. And this is something that propels near everyone we meet. They all teach the author respect for the ingredient and the process. I like that the people who are able to teach most are people who exhibit none of the callous machismo, sexism, anger and bravado. I like that the author presents these unflattering sides of people to us. A lesser book might have ignored this in favor of reveling in the insider status afforded.
The books structure in essence is - I was curious about this food, I found this person making this food, I learned from them about this food. In each step we make a small detour in description. And this somehow transposes the authors curiosity to us. No mean feat.
Few people would have been able to devote the amount of obsession that Mr Buford does, and fewer still would be able to transpose the same curiosity and obsession onto the reader.
He alludes to his ability to shake off haute cuisines toxicities as coming from him being a tourist in this life. I believe it comes from having a surety of life independent of the business and on his character. Whats telling for me, is that toxic environments are created by people with big stakes and an inability to articulate their dependence on other people in failure and in success. Certainly in their orbits are people under similar stresses exhibiting none of the toxic behavior.
Principally, we look at Mario Batali and Dario Ceccini. In the journey we meet a lot more people in their orbits and the digressions are well structured and add to the book as a whole. It is tempting to use food imagery. Everything is well proportioned.
Some thoughts - certainly the obsession of food, the making of it and seeking perfection in the same is presented well. And this is something that propels near everyone we meet. They all teach the author respect for the ingredient and the process. I like that the people who are able to teach most are people who exhibit none of the callous machismo, sexism, anger and bravado. I like that the author presents these unflattering sides of people to us. A lesser book might have ignored this in favor of reveling in the insider status afforded.
The books structure in essence is - I was curious about this food, I found this person making this food, I learned from them about this food. In each step we make a small detour in description. And this somehow transposes the authors curiosity to us. No mean feat.