...
Show More
I found this book hard going. The Copernicus that Banville depicts is an inscrutable unemotional scholar that it is difficult to warm to.
I don't get a sense of what drove him or how Copernicus developed his heliocentric theory. Too much is left unsaid and yet too much is aid about the sexual proclivities of the main characters. Why?
So the medieval mind may have had different sensibilities about sexual matters but it was tiresome how often the author descends into crudeness. I don't understand how it furthered the story or gave any greater insight.
There was one bit of philosophising about what it all meant in a dialogue between Copernicus and Rheticus that was the closest to giving us a glimpse of the Copernicus character but by that stage I couldn't care less.
I don't get a sense of what drove him or how Copernicus developed his heliocentric theory. Too much is left unsaid and yet too much is aid about the sexual proclivities of the main characters. Why?
So the medieval mind may have had different sensibilities about sexual matters but it was tiresome how often the author descends into crudeness. I don't understand how it furthered the story or gave any greater insight.
There was one bit of philosophising about what it all meant in a dialogue between Copernicus and Rheticus that was the closest to giving us a glimpse of the Copernicus character but by that stage I couldn't care less.