...
Show More
I thought that overall the book was quite good, though it starts off in a way that I found quite predictable (aparatchik male with unsatisfied beautiful and silent wife, alienation from kids who represent two sides of his character and are diametrically opposed, etc.) I also did not always appreciate how at times the paragraph would be in the third person and then morph into the first person. Later, this kind of mechanism was intergrated in a way that worked better, given the kind of "unthreading" of the mental state of the protagonist.
I am glad that I've done a lot of reading on the period (in fact, if I hadn't read Orlando Figes' The Whisperers, I would have not understood the corridor living situation of Moscow that is described in various parts of the book).
I truly enjoyed all of the discussions about art history (not so much those about the magic of art) in particular the description of Rublev.
In all, it was a good read.
I am glad that I've done a lot of reading on the period (in fact, if I hadn't read Orlando Figes' The Whisperers, I would have not understood the corridor living situation of Moscow that is described in various parts of the book).
I truly enjoyed all of the discussions about art history (not so much those about the magic of art) in particular the description of Rublev.
In all, it was a good read.