...
Show More
Obviously interesting history but marred (IMHO) by uneven--and odd--levels of detail in some places but not in others, some casual interjections of opinion, and a semi-chronological structure that had him bouncing around in time and place probably more than was optimal.
His choice of focal points (the student/youth movements, Czechoslovakia, the 1968 election) were fine. He did have some occasional minor players on which he did a more than casual dive (Poland, France and De Gaulle, feminism, Mexico). But I'm not sure I ever did fully get his editorial choices over what to cover at length, versus what received zero or glancing coverage.
I did like his comment about Republicans going for the racist vote, while Democrats went for the black vote, and discovering there were more racists than blacks. I guess some things don't change.
I missed 1968 myself...my experience of that year was the same as Eddie Izzard ("Look Dad, I got soot in me eyes...look Dad, I've got a banana in each ear"). So I did like having this bit of my own history filled in.
His choice of focal points (the student/youth movements, Czechoslovakia, the 1968 election) were fine. He did have some occasional minor players on which he did a more than casual dive (Poland, France and De Gaulle, feminism, Mexico). But I'm not sure I ever did fully get his editorial choices over what to cover at length, versus what received zero or glancing coverage.
I did like his comment about Republicans going for the racist vote, while Democrats went for the black vote, and discovering there were more racists than blacks. I guess some things don't change.
I missed 1968 myself...my experience of that year was the same as Eddie Izzard ("Look Dad, I got soot in me eyes...look Dad, I've got a banana in each ear"). So I did like having this bit of my own history filled in.