...
Show More
Beautiful language and prose. Honest. This was my favorite Forster I've read - I read A Room with a View and A Passage to India in 2022.
Forster doesn't hide what he's trying to say in any of his books; I just find his view of the world and marriage to be one that doesn't fit with mine. I also tire of too-all-knowing characters who don't explain their motivations or their understanding but just intuit without helping the reader along. The "Angel in the House" motif may have ended in the 1800s, but Forster's women are too perfect, IMO.
Margaret and Helen remind me in many ways of Austen's Elinor and Marianne - practical and emotional and Forster seems to be seeing what would happen to them in this more modern world of telegrams and automobiles.
The cultural distinctions of being German or British were interesting. The way place and places became characters themselves within the story was well done; the disorientation of space that Margaret expresses while traveling by train is part of this, too.
I can give it a clear 4 stars for many reasons despite disagreements. Forster's command of syntax and vocabulary is precise and a delight to be immersed in. I was able to listen to the book on a 10 hour drive and it was good company. I enjoyed watching the story unfold, even if, ultimately I profoundly disagree with much of it.
I understand why Henry Wilcox had to be broken entirely; but I wish Forster had returned a shred of dignity to him and his children. I'm surprised a jury convicted Charles of manslaughter when it was clear that he did not kill Leonard Bast. Margaret Wilcox was too-knowing and self assured and was never broken herself - her self assurance and pride surely, while different than Henry's - also deserved correction. Some of the story - Margaret's friendship with the first Mrs. Wilcox - seemed too unbelievable to me.
Forster doesn't hide what he's trying to say in any of his books; I just find his view of the world and marriage to be one that doesn't fit with mine. I also tire of too-all-knowing characters who don't explain their motivations or their understanding but just intuit without helping the reader along. The "Angel in the House" motif may have ended in the 1800s, but Forster's women are too perfect, IMO.
Margaret and Helen remind me in many ways of Austen's Elinor and Marianne - practical and emotional and Forster seems to be seeing what would happen to them in this more modern world of telegrams and automobiles.
The cultural distinctions of being German or British were interesting. The way place and places became characters themselves within the story was well done; the disorientation of space that Margaret expresses while traveling by train is part of this, too.
I can give it a clear 4 stars for many reasons despite disagreements. Forster's command of syntax and vocabulary is precise and a delight to be immersed in. I was able to listen to the book on a 10 hour drive and it was good company. I enjoyed watching the story unfold, even if, ultimately I profoundly disagree with much of it.
I understand why Henry Wilcox had to be broken entirely; but I wish Forster had returned a shred of dignity to him and his children. I'm surprised a jury convicted Charles of manslaughter when it was clear that he did not kill Leonard Bast. Margaret Wilcox was too-knowing and self assured and was never broken herself - her self assurance and pride surely, while different than Henry's - also deserved correction. Some of the story - Margaret's friendship with the first Mrs. Wilcox - seemed too unbelievable to me.