Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 98 votes)
5 stars
33(34%)
4 stars
35(36%)
3 stars
30(31%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
98 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
"I'm wallowing in words!--David, later working as a legal proctor on wordy legal documents, and I, the readers of this 900-page book!

I had several hours in a car so took on rereading this tome, listening to a great reader. I have a vague idea of then reading Barbara Kingsolver’s also huge book after that. We’ll see!

7/1/23: Can anyone do bathos (look it up, kids!) like Charles Dickens? The deliciously agonizing misery of childhood: Hard Times has depictions of harsh and cruel schooling and so does this tale, where poor David is made to wear a signboard that warns people that he bites people. This is like the orphanage of Oliver Twist, but is a school to punish bad children.

And what did Davey do? Well, his Dad died while Davey’s mom was pregnant and at 4 Davey has a new Daddy who outgrinds Gradgrind in “firmness” and beats him into submission until. . . that fatal bite that puts him in strict "charity" school for wayward children. What is it about nineteenth-century schooling? Jane Eyre’s school, yikes. But I understand that David Copperfield is seen as Dickens's most autobiographical novel. Virginia Woolf also said it was Dickens's "most perfect novel." It was Dickens's favorite book that he had written.

7/4: Still in the first 1/4 of the book, and it's such a continuing load of misery, as Davey is forced to leave the frying pan of the cruel charity school back to the fire of his step-father, and his cruelly manipulated mother, whom Davey is largely forbidden to speak with, and who now has a second baby with the evil Murdstone, who threatens him (he's ten now) with flogging if he disobeys him on any issue. Then. . . after he leaves to go back to school he learns (spoiler) that his mother and the new baby have died. He's an orphan, supported for a time by his loving nurse Peggotty, then (at ten) Davey's working long hours in London for a wine merchant at slave wages (no child labor laws in Victorian England, which some states are repealing in summer 2023 so we can go back to the good ol' days!). Early on there is almost constant misery in the Victorian fashion, but there are so many great characters in this bildungsroman, a coming-of-age book for the ages.

“It was a long and gloomy night that gathered on me, haunted by the ghosts of many hopes, of many dear remembrances, many errors, many unavailing sorrows and regrets.”

7/9/23: About halfway.

David Copperfield’s life is a rollercoaster of anguish and despair at the bottom, which constitutes largely the first third of the book where he, destitute, goes to an unlikely source of help, his grumpy Aunt Betsey Trotwood, who top of the rollercoaster!--surprisingly agrees to take him in, be his benefactor, gets him a good education where he is Head Boy in the school, and is given a healthy endowment to begin his life in London, where he finds good friends, and young women--oh, kissing! At one point he kisses a girl: “Oh! Ecstasy! I might have died happy that day.”

David’s the veritable Horatio Alger (not that secret Clarence Thomas society) Pluck ‘n’ Luck boy of the late nineteenth-century sentimental novels, but those others are pale copies; DC is the real thing, genuinely good and insightful, and all the supporting characters richly and entertainingly described. David befriends Steerforth, who betrays his wife and family and gets Emily, an old sweet friend, pregnant. He trusted and loved this guy! So good David is sometimes not as insightful as we’d like and altogether too trusting at times. He’s human. He makes mistakes, is not perfect, but in general he is what we know about Dickens, a veritable Boy Scout Handbook of virtues: charity, humility, kindness.

“. . . I hope that simple love and truth will be strong in the end. I hope that real love and truth are stronger in the end than any evil or misfortune in the world.”

From the beginning, reading bolsters him: “These books were a way of escaping from the unhappiness of my life.”

David learns how to face adversity, from Aunt Betsey: “We must meet reverses boldly, and not suffer them to frighten us, my dear. We must learn to act the play out. We must live misfortune down!”

Such great characters. David is out of money and needs to sell his coat to this old guy in London:

"Oh, my lungs and liver," cried the old man, "no! Oh, my eyes, no! Oh, my limbs, no! Eighteenpence. Goroo!"

--The Micawbers--kinda goofy, verbose, struggling, asking David for money, plotting schemes to make money.

--Uriah Heep (not the rock band!) is a creep, taking advantage of his (alcoholic) boss Mr. Wickfield, and aiming for David’s dearest Agnes. David initially says he is glad to meet young Uriah, and Uriah replies, “I would be proud to meet you, too, except I know pride is a sin.” Later he says, “Oh, I’m too 'umble to accept a gift from you!” But he finds a way to get over this fawning pride/humility conundrum when he has a chance to swindle Wickfield.

7/11/23: “I am almost completely earnest, all the time”--David

“I like to be liked”-Dora, who (spoiler) actually becomes David’s wife (oh no!).

So David/Davey/Davis/Doady/Trot (depending on who is talking to him) is doing quite well until Aunt Betsey suddenly loses most of her money and can no longer support him. David has fallen head over heels with and is engaged to (the pathetic) Dora, one of the shallowest characters ever, who does not want to marry him if he is poor. I guess in his defense, sweet Dora is a little like dear old Mum, nice but naive. She has no practical skills, and David even admits her family treats her like Dora treats her little annoying dog, doting on her, spoiling her. This is a flaw in David at this point, his idiocy in making romantic choices.

David’s lifelong friend Agnes even helps him change Dora’s mind, which leads to some excruciatingly painful/comical early marriage scenes. Yes, alas, dear reader, she marries him. Agnes at this time is being pursued by evil villain Uriah Heep (oh, no! hiss!), who has taken advantage of Agnes’s (alcoholic) father Wickham, and who now is partner with Wickfield.

A good deal of the last third of the book focuses on romance and the nature of true love and bad relationship choices, though we also began the book with a disastrous one, when David’s widowed mother for some reason chooses the vile Murdstone as a second husband. Barkis married nurse Peggotty and that worked out pretty well, so love can work.

I love Aunt Betsey Trotwood, one of the most insightful and outspoken critics of bad characters throughout, and an often admirable feminist.

David gets a job as a legal proctor, so he begins to make a decent living, and supplements this job working on mounds of legal documents-- “I’m wallowing in words!”--with writing articles, stories, and even beginning a novel. Dickens autofiction! At 900+ words, we who read David Coppperfield are ourselves wallowing in words, though I am not really complaining.

7/16/23: Okay, a nearly 900-page novel completed--check!--reread, and it is a triumph. We open in misery, a life Charles Dickens actually lived, recorded in this auto-fiction, experience that shaped all of his work, focused on cruelty to women and children at the hands of megalomaniac men, ending in a kind of triumph, good news pretty much all around, endorsing generosity and kindness, huzzah! That’s a good summary right there. Yes, if you are looking for happy endings (and some of the most entertaining characters in the history of literature, though I am thinking of all of his novels, too), it does not end at the bottom of the rollercoaster.

We have, in the last two hundred pages, a lot of plot threads to resolve, so (spoiler alert for this more than 100-year-old novel):

*Uriah Heep, the rockstar villain, we discover, has defrauded almost all of the good guys, and (improbably) the too-talkative, somewhat bumbling Mr. Micawber follows the clues to determine Heep (H-h-h-Heep, he calls him, unable to pronounce his name without stuttering) had taken money from not only Wickfield, but also taken (indirectly) money from Our Hero David, via his benefactor Aunt Betsy and others. Turns out there’s a very good reason that Micawber, Traddles and Copperfield Himself have gone into law careers. Lock him up!

*We also needed to resolve the situation with poor (young) Emily, done wrong by the villain Steerforth, who in typical patriarchal fashion is (cruelly) blamed by many for “ruining the life and career” of this profligate, dastardly married man and father, who had taken her to Europe and dumped her and gone on to other women. So the noble Uncle Daniel Peggotty rescues Emily from a life of destitution and prostitution to take her to Australia for a few years. But she comes back, saved from further ruin to see her childhood friend David again. The ways some characters humanely treated Emily is hopeful, finally.

*We meet the villain Murdstones again, destroying the life of yet another young person.

* We hear the villain schoolmaster Creakle (these names!) runs a prison according to his (“firm”) system.

*Spoiler now, but poor Rosa dies in complications following a miscarriage. David always loved the (sweet and shallow) Rosa, but in her parting words she admits that she had married David when she was too young and naive, and we agree.

*This leaves things open for the good David to marry the good Agnes. Yay! David, a sweet and trusting man, is a little slow to see the true nature of people. Doesn’t always make the best choices with women or men. Errs by seeing their potential, which sometimes gets him in trouble.

This autobiographical novel does not have adequate room to go deeply into David/Charles as a successful writer, but his fame grows by novel’s end.

I joked about all the misery of the opening 2-300 pages, but this is a great book, no question, and I am already reading Barbara Kingsolver’s Demon Copperhead, that (in part) maps a contemporary Southern trailer park on to Dickens’s template, showing us the relevance of Dickens's ideas for reflecting on the twenty-first century world.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Read the majority of this over the course of 4 days snowed in under 2 or so feet of blizzard and its dimming snowlight day's circular repetition, in a new house, often in near silence only punctuated by winter robins chirping outside, in between making pots of coffee and organizing my books and music and furniture. I can think of few more delightful states in which to absorb this classic Bildungsroman, which appears to be one of that genre of book called Perfect Novel. Shall I read more Dickens? I shall read them all.
April 17,2025
... Show More
David Copperfield is a story about growing up.

It is a story about understanding people; it is a story about understanding that our perceptions of people do not always match the reality of that person. We can idealise them. We can believe in them. We can love them. But that does not necessarily mean they are what we believe them to be or what we want them to be.

In classic Dickensian fashion, this is not a happy story; it is one full of hardship and harsh realisations, but it is also one of growth: it is one about the potential of becoming a better and stronger person despite the inherent pain that comes with this thing called life. We can learn from it.

It is a great story, one full of memorable and interesting characters. Some are awkwardly eccentric and some plain villainous. Here the marvel of Dickens shines through because he can capture people so incredibly well: he is the master of description. The way he writes brings all the quirks and individualism of his characters to life. There are few writers who can do this so well and with such a vast multitude of subjects. Each character is unique because the observation skills of his narrators scrutinise and report in such a detailed manner.

I became quite invested in David’s life. I cared about David. I wanted to see the world do him right after his unfortunate early experiences. And the conclusion was everything the story needed to be. But, for me, that is where it all ends. I do not have anything else positive to say because David Copperfield did not make me think nor did it make me consider anything else beyond the plot level. It gave me everything and it left me nothing to chew over.

Let me try to explain myself a little better. To compare this to Great Expectations, a sweeping story of love and tragedy, it is totally vanilla. That book is intriguing and mysterious. There is an element of the unknown. There are shadows that linger over the writing and it is a story that remains with me many years after reading it. It is that powerful. With David Copperfield, though, I feel like I could quite easily (and happily) forget most of what happened here.

It is a story I enjoyed but that is all, so three stars seems about right here. Tepid is the word that comes to mind when I think about David Copperfield.
__________________________________

You can connect with me on social media via My Linktree.
__________________________________
April 17,2025
... Show More
This is my second huge Dickens book of the year but with this one I had my lovely goodreads friend Dean reading it alongside me. We read a few chapters a day throughout the month and shared our thoughts daily. About half way through I had a health issue which if not for Dean would probably have lead me to quit the book, but he was really understanding and patient, and although I fell a little behind I was able to catch up and enjoy the rest. So a big thank you to him for that.:))

This is my 9th Dickens and although I've really enjoyed it, it's not a favourite even though it was Dickens personal favourite.

There are as ever some brilliant characters here, both good and bad, the thouroughly detestable Uriah Heep who was fantastically well described and the Micawber family who were likeable if very annoying and long winded.
2 of my favourites were Aunt Betsey Trotwood who was so cantankerous in the begining but who David came to for help at the height of his troubles and she supported him and also Mr Peggotty, the old seaman who played such an important role in so many peoples lives.
The story has many threads but as Dickens always does every last one is 'tied up' at the end, even minor characters get their denoument. I said to Dean that it makes me wonder if Dickens didn't write the book from the end and work towards the start because he forgets nobody!!
So all in all a good book which I'd reccomend to everyone.
4*
April 17,2025
... Show More
One of my favourite books by Charles Dickens. I loved the book and the film was just as I had imagined the characters to be. A wonderful classic story..
April 17,2025
... Show More
Read as part of The Infinite Variety Reading Challenge, based on the BBC's Big Read Poll of 2003.

Charles Dickens can do no wrong, except perhaps keep around 100 pages of rather irrelevant tangents in this book.

It was such a powerhouse of characterisation and world-building that I barely know where to begin. All of the characters were utterly divine, even the detestable Uriah Heep and the unbelievably pathetic Dora, and most especially the wonderful early Feminist icon that is Betsy Trotwood. I often have my doubts on first-person narrative, but Dickens is one of the few who can do it so well without losing many of the great advantages of reading with an omnipotent narrator. David Copperfield is unreliable in many fields-mostly his blind-spot for falling in love-but he is in-tune with his surroundings and can express what he feels other characters around him are feeling so suitably that it matters not that we are seeing the world through his young eyes only.

The world was fantastic: I am always immediately transported to these places when I read 19th Century fiction and this was no exception. The strife of the poor and the decadence of the indifferent rich is interwoven here like smoke billowing in to pure oxygen. There were so many nooks and crannies to be explored that it took me a while to get through this nigh-on 900 page book, but it was worth it.

Aside from one or two tangents which meant the story-line stalled ever so slightly, it flowed magnificently and I don't remember laughing so much at a book that wasn't a straight humour novel. Dickens has a way of writing with such endearment about his characters and society, but also tearing them apart at the same time. It was a beautiful ride through the English countryside and a nice run through the heavy streets of London and I don't think Thackeray was wrong when he said, "Bravo Dickens."
April 17,2025
... Show More
کتاب دیوید کاپرفیلد را می‌توان معروف‌ترین رمان چارلز دیکنز در نظر گرفت. این رمان با کودکی دیوید که کودک مورد علاقۀ خود چارلز دیکنز نیز هست؛ شروع شده و تا دوره‌ی میان سالی او ادامه می‌یابد.
دیوید شش ماه بعد از مرگ پدرش به دنیا می‌آید. به نوعی نحسی در زندگی این کودک پیش از تولدش شروع شده است. در ابتدای داستان دیوید با مادری مهربان و شیرین و نازنین همراه است تا این که مشکلات زندگی او را وادار می‌کند با مردی به نام موردستون ازدواج کند مردی با رفتاری خشونت‌آمیز که سرانجام دیوید را به مدرسه‌ای بیرون شهر می‌فرستد. مشکلات دیوید ادامه دارد، بعد از مدتی مادر او نیز می‌میرد و… .
چالز دیکنز (Charles Dickens)، دیوید کاپرفیلد (David Copper field) را کودک مورد علاقه خود می‌نامد و منتقدان آن را زیباترین توصیف دیکنز از دوران کودکی می‌دانند. یکی از علل علاقه دیکنز به این رمان شاید این است که حوادث و وقایع این داستان متاثر از رخدادهای زندگی خود اوست.
چارلز دیکنز در سال 1812 در انگلستان به دنیا آمد و در سال 1870 در گذشت. او در زمان کودکى سختى‌هاى بسیار کشید. در سال 1824 پدرش به‌ خاطر بدهى به زندان افتاد و چارلز براى گذران زندگى مجبور به کار در یک کارخانه شد. اینگونه تجربه‌های او در سن کم، در رمان‌هایش نمودی بارز پیدا کرده است. در بیشتر نوشته‌هایش اتفاقات دلخراشی که در انگلستان زمان او روى مى‌داده، توصیف شده است. او نویسنده بزرگ بریتانیایی است و از مفاخر ادبیات انگلیسی به حساب می‌آید. بسیاری از داستان‌های او در دوران کودکی قهرمان‌هایش می‌گذرد. از نوشته‌های دیگر او می‌توان به «اولیور تویست»، «آرزوهای بزرگ» و «سرود کریسمس» اشاره کرد که در تمام آن‌ها نقش نمادین کودک و دوران کودکی آشکار است.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Finished. Having a hard time spinning superlatives for this review. It is more or less established I strongly like, or passionately love, every Dickens novel I read so why not slap a five-star badge on this masterpiece and hop down to Bev’s café for a veggie burger, free sexual innuendo with every purchase, a fly in every milkshake, and a 50p discount on all half-cooked omelettes? Fine. Some highlights. Improvements in characterisation. Notably, the villains. David’s friendship with Steerforth partially blinds the reader to his scoundrelly tendencies until his flitting with sweet Emily. Uriah Heep’s squirminess and umbleness wrongfoots the reader until his scoundrelly tendencies are unmasked (although David outs him as a beast from the start). The first-person narrator opens doors of eloquence in Dickens’s prose hitherto closed in the topographical omniscience of previous works. As usual, a memorable cast of eccentrics, stoics, loveable fuck-ups and social climbers. No sagging secondary plots like in Dombey and Son. Deeply moving passages on the passing of time, memory, penitence, friendship and naïve love (Dora is a female Peter Pan). High-class comedy a-go-go. An enriching experience. Your soul glows reading this. You want more from a book? Geddouttahere. Time for that veggie burger. Open til nine and never over capacity (like fecking GR).
April 17,2025
... Show More
(Book 898 from 1001 books) - David Copperfield, Charles Dickens

David Copperfield is the eighth novel by Charles Dickens. The novel's full title is The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account). It was first published as a serial in 1849–50, and as a book in 1850.

Many elements of the novel follow events in Dickens's own life, and it is often considered as his veiled autobiography.

It was Dickens' favourite among his own novels. In the preface to the 1867 edition, Dickens wrote, "like many fond parents, I have in my heart of hearts a favourite child. And his name is David Copperfield."

The story follows the life of David Copperfield from childhood to maturity.

David was born in Blunderstone, Suffolk, England, six months after the death of his father. David spends his early years in relative happiness with his loving, childish mother and their kindly housekeeper, Clara Peggotty. They call him Davy.

When he is seven years old his mother marries Edward Murdstone. To get him out of the way, David is sent to lodge with Peggotty's family in Yarmouth. Her brother, fisherman Mr Peggotty, lives in a beached barge, with his adopted relatives Emily and Ham, and an elderly widow, Mrs Gummidge. "Little Em'ly" is somewhat spoiled by her fond foster father, and David is in love with her. They call him Master Copperfield.

On his return, David is given good reason to dislike his stepfather, who believes exclusively in firmness, and has similar feelings for Murdstone's sister Jane, who moves into the house soon afterwards.

Between them they tyrannize his poor mother, making her and David's lives miserable, and when, in consequence, David falls behind in his studies, Murdstone attempts to thrash him – partly to further pain his mother. David bites him and soon afterwards is sent away to Salem House, a boarding school, under a ruthless headmaster named Mr Creakle.

There he befriends an older boy, James Steerforth, and Tommy Traddles. He develops an impassioned admiration for Steerforth, perceiving him as someone noble, who could do great things if he would, and one who pays attention to him. ...

عنوانهای چاپ شده در ایران: «دیوید کاپرفیلد»؛ «سرگذشت دیوید کاپرفیلد»؛ «داوید کاپرفیلد»؛ نویسنده: چارلز دیکنز؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش: روز نخست ماه نوامبر سال 1971میلادی

مترجم: مسعود رجب نیا؛ تهران، امیرکبیر، 1342، در سه جلد، کتابهای پرستو، چاپ ششم، 1367 در 665ص، چاپ امیرکبیر، 1384 ، در 1030ص؛ موضوع: داستانهای نویسندگان بریتانیا- سده 19م

مترجم: رضا همراه، انتشارات اشراقی، 1353؛

مترجم: محمدرضا جعفری؛ تهران، امیرکبیر، کتابهای طلایی 19، در 43ص، مصور؛

مترجم: فرینوش ایرانبدی - خلاصه داستان؛ تلخیص: میشل وست؛ تهران، توسن، 1363، در 117ص

مترجم: ثریا نظمی - خلاصه داستان؛ تهران، دادجو، 1365، در 160ص

مترجم: علیرضا نعمتی؛ تهران، افشار، 1365، در 175ص

مترجم: خسرو شایسته؛ تهران، سپیده، 1369، در 174ص

مترجم: احمد پناهی خراسانی؛ مشهد، بنگاه کتاب، 1369، در 150ص

مترجم: امیر صادقی؛ تهران، ارغوان، 1372، در 144ص

مترجم: فریده نونهال؛ تهران، جانزاده، 1375، در 120ص

مترجم: ناصر ایراندوست؛ تهران، اردیبهشت، 1377، در 159ص

مترجم: علی فاطمیان؛ تهران، وزارت ارشاد - نشر چشم انداز، 1379، در 236ص

مترجم: مهدی سحابی؛ تهران، کتاب مریم، مرکز، چاپ چهارم برای نوجوانان 1385، در 120ص

مترجم: مهسا یزدانی؛ تهران، بهجت، 1388، بدون شماره ص

مترجم: محسن سلیمانی - متن کوتاه شده؛ تهران، افق، 1388، در 679ص

مترجم: امیر باهور؛ تهران، امیرکبیر کتابهای جیبی، 1389، در 211ص

مترجم: مریم سلحشور؛ قم، رخ مهتاب، 1391، در 242ص

مترجم: حسن زمانی - تلخیص؛ تهران، همشهری، 1391، در 118ص

مترجم: لیلا سبحانی؛ تهران، ثالث، 1392، در 208ص

مترجم: آرمین هدایتی؛ تهران، پارسه، 1393، در 243ص

مترجم: نعیمه ظاهری؛ قزوین، سایه گستر، 1393، مصور در 48ص

همین کتاب با عنوانهای: «سرگذشت دیوید کاپرفیلد» و «داوید کاپرفیلد» نیز چاپ شده است

دیوید کاپرفیلد، نام رمانی نوشتهٔ «چارلز دیکنز»، نویسندهٔ انگلیسی، و نیز نام شخصیت اصلی همین داستان است؛ این کتاب برای نخستین بار در سال 1850میلادی منتشر شد؛ «دیکنز» این کتاب را از سایر کتابهای خود برتر می‌دانستند، شاید از اینروی که رخدادهای هیجان‌انگیز، و بسیاری از عناصر داستان، برگرفته از رخدادهای زندگی خود ایشان بوده است، و می‌توان گفت: «بیش از دیگر رمانهایش، قالب اتوبیوگرافی دارد.»؛

شخصیت اصلی این داستان، «دیوید کاپرفیلد»، کودک مورد علاقه ی خود «دیکنز» نیز می‌باشد؛ «دیوید کاپرفیلد» به دوران پختگی، و کمال هنری «دیکنز» تعلق دارد؛ حجم انتقاد صریح اجتماعی، در این رمان کمتر از نوشته‌ های دیگر ایشان است؛ در این داستان، توجه نویسنده، بیشتر به ماجراهای خانگی، و روحانی است، تا بیدادهای اجتماعی؛ هرچند، با توجه به زندگی خود نویسنده، همچنان در این رمان، به مسائل روانشناختی، از دید اجتماعی، آشکارا توجه شده است؛ خفت‌های شخصیت «پیپ»، در این رمان، فرازجویی‌هایش، بزرگ منشی‌های به خود بسته‌ اش، و نیز ترقی و تنزلش، همه، نمادهای اجتماعی قابل شناخت‌، هستند؛

طرح کلی داستان: در داستان «دیوید» اول شخص است؛ در فصلهای نخست، «دیوید» را، همراه مادر جوانش می‌بینیم، مادری معبود «دیوید»، که آفریده ای است شیرین، و نازنین، اما ضعیف، و سبک مغز؛ «پگاتی»، که موجودی عجیب و غریب، و رفتارش تند و خشن، ولی دلش سرشار از مهر، و عطوفت است نیز، در کنار آنان است؛ رشتهٔ این زندگی آمیخته به عشق و محبت، با ازدواج بیوه ی جوان، با آقای «موردستون» مردی سنگدل، که در پس نقاب متانت مردانه پنهان شده، گسسته میشود؛ این مرد، به تحریک خواهرش، سرانجام باعث مرگ پیشرس همسر جوان و ساده دل خود میشود؛ «دیکنز»، تأثرات این کودک را، که نمی‌تواند با محیط تازه سازگار شود، و در لاک خود فرو میرود، استادانه شرح داده‌ است؛ ناپدری، کودک عاصی را، به مدرسه میفرستد، تا بدرفتاریهای آقای «کریکل ظالم» را تحمل کند؛ وی در مدرسه، نسبت به یکی از رفیقان خود، به نام «استیرفورث»، حس ستایش بی‌حدی پیدا میکند؛ او جوانکی است فریبنده، که بعداً باعث سرخوردگی دوستش میشود، و کودک با «ترادلز» مهربان، و خوش‌بین، که با کشیدن اسکلت، وقت میگذراند، صمیمی می‌شود؛ ناپدری «دیوید»، پس از آن، او را به کارهایی پست، در فروشگاه «موردستون و گرینبی»، در «لندن» محکوم میسازد؛ وی در آن ایام، در نهایت رنج و محنت، به سر میبرد، و این خود، بارتاب روزهایی است، که «دیکنز» در کودکی، در کارگاه کفش گذرانده بودند؛ خوشبختانه، دوستی با آقای «میکابر» و خانواده اش، جان تازه ای به او میبخشد؛ آقای «میکابر» یکی از آفریده های فناناپذیر «دیکنز» است.؛ و ...؛

تاریخ بهنگام رسانی 09/06/1399هجری خورشیدی؛ 16/05/1400هجری خورشیدی؛ ا. شربیانی
April 17,2025
... Show More
Mr. Micawber's Shakespearean unmasking of Uriah Heep will always be a favorite.

===========

Interesting back story on this book, provided by the French writer, Emmanuel Carrère.....

in 1849, David Copperfield was being serialised in monthly instalments. In the first pages of the novel, a secondary character appears named Miss Mowcher, who, from all available evidence is depicted as scheming, envious and sycophantic, in addition to being a dwarf. She is portrayed as evil personified, and so, since there is nothing readers of fiction enjoy more than a villain, and since Dickens was by then a writer with a considerable readership, all of England was licking its lips in anticipation of the lady’s future misdeeds. Then something unexpected happened. One morning, Dickens received a letter in which a provincial lady bitterly complained that, because of her physical resemblance to Miss Mowcher— the writer of the letter was also a dwarf— the people in her village had begun to mistrust her, they muttered as she passed and sent her anonymous threats; all in all, the lady concluded her letter, she was a good woman, but because of him and of Miss Mowcher her life had become a living hell.

We know how most writers would have responded to the lady’s letter: they would not have responded at all; or, if so, their response would have been: the problem the lady had raised was not his, but that of those people who confuse reality with fiction and who cruelly and foolishly identify fictional characters with real people. Dickens’ response was very different: he changed the character, he changed everything: readers clamoured impatiently for more of Miss Mowcher’s misdeeds, everything had been plotted to accommodate them, but in the following instalment, Dickens transformed his wicked witch into a good-hearted woman who, beneath her unfortunate appearance, was an angel.

============

Re-reading this book I was confronted again with the cruel Puritan-Evangelical Murdstones. Dickens was raised in an Evangelical household, but came to despise it for its hypocrisy. Dickens does not harp on it, but is still frank, as in this passage from Little Dorrit.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

==========

The difference between Austen and Dickens, from Nabokov's lectures on literature....

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9484...
April 17,2025
... Show More
I DID IT! I finally finished listening to 36 1/2 hours of David Copperfield! It was all Copperfield all the time for the month of January. I loved the story of Master Davey, Mister Copperfield, Trot, Daisy, some of the many names he was called. Dickens tells his fictional account of his life with humor, pathos and tenderness toward his subject. I cried, I laughed, I was anxious for DC as he went wide-eyed into the world. Dickens characters are writ large to make his points about human nature, points that stand the test of time still today, almost 175 years later. His writing is lively and rarely flags. I'm so happy to have spent so much time with these characters.

I will say that I've listened to a lot of audiobooks over the years, but this is up there in my top five favorites ever. Bravo, Richard Armitage! With that said, I'm glad to have had the Penguin Classics print book at hand to see how the book was broken up into the installments Dickens published over 20 months before issuing them as a book, to read the scholarly introduction, and the notes of explanation of language and culture of the time.

I'm continuing the theme of all Copperfield all the time by watching the 1999 tv series starring soon-to-be Harry Potter, Daniel Radcliffe.



Why I'm reading this: Want to read this before I clear the hold list for Demon Copperhead. I've loved Dickens writing and storytelling so have high hopes for this. I'm listening because the book is over 500pp, my threshold for listening instead of reading in print. Have a print copy on hand for reference.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Dickens competes for the running in my top spots, with Kafka and Tolkien. This novel marks the most potent, well-written, and skillful piece of literature I have yet read. It may be my favorite; time will reveal.

In the preface, Dickens writes, “…like many fond parents, I have in my heart of hearts a favourite child. And his name is David Copperfield.”

My first experience with the impact of Dicken’s potency unfolded when he had rebelled against Murdstone, his stepfather, and would be sent away. Pegotty, the housekeeper, comes to his room at night, where he is locked in, and kneels by the door in tears and pleading goodbye to him, pouring out her heart of love upon him. It’s emotional and intense. I couldn’t refrain from an unconscious tendency to hear sad violin music and hear people around me weeping at the scene. He has many of these potent moments, especially in the end.

Here are some characters, in brief:
Murdstone: As mentioned already, the step-father, a hard, mean man, who manifests the times concerning child mistreatment. His sister treats David like a wild, troublesome dog.

Betsy Trotwood: His aunt, who in the beginning sounds harsh, but accepts David when he runs away in tears, with deep love and compassion. She has enormous self-will and is bold in her wordings.
I enjoy how Dickens lets the reader make the judgments and shows skill in unveiling someone’s character as life would unveil it, until circumstance show that person who they are. Perfect examples of the famous writer line: “show, don’t tell.”

Micawber: A man who struggles throughout the novel to take care of his family, with continual hardship. David loves the man.
Another point about this novel—the main character isn’t the center. If you take away the people in his life, his personal well-being doesn’t change much, except that he cares deeply for his friends.

Steerforth: David idolizes the young man, a charismatic leader type, the kind girls in high school swoon over. He calls David “Daisy,” which I found rather disdainful, but David loved, although he seemed blinded by what psychologists call “The Halo Effect.” Steerforth also becomes a revelation of character.

Traddles: David’s friend. Comical guy. I remember him for his red hair always sticking up and having a worried look on his face. Again, Traddles changes throughout the book, so the use of development and revelation both.

Ham: Peggoty’s nephew and fiancé to Emily, a crush of David, in the beginning.

Emily: A young, sweet lady who finds herself in trouble throughout the novel, but again, David helps his friends.

Dora Spenlow: She becomes David’s wife, and I judged her as rather a mistake, as David regretted marrying her for a respite, urged by his infatuation with her cuteness and childlikeness.
Another thing about Dickens: he shows you yourself through his characters. I judged her one way, but when Dora goes through some things later, I realized that I loved her very much, and wanted the best for her. I guess I can hint a spoiler and say this made me terribly sad.

Uriah Heep: In my opinion, the greatest villain ever created, so far that I’ve read. He had me, even though Copperfield believed otherwise (another talent of Dickens, letting the reader differ in opinion from a first-person narrator). In the end he shows what really hides inside him, and it scared the hell out of me. I’ve read the most dangerous weapon in an enemy’s hand is trust, and Heep had mine, until that “moment.”

Agnes: This woman grows up with David and stays by his side through all his troubles, always giving him hope and reminding him to look up. Agnes has a secret, and it pulls the whole book together at the conclusion.


He pulls everything together with precision and accuracy, the best ending writer I’ve read. He has powerful resonance that makes you close it and stare at the cover, then when you see the book again, it comes over you again, and you feel it.

Dickens has sentiment, heart and emotion.

The end is worth the entire journey of this long masterpiece. It’s like a reward for our time and attention. The ending holds my favorite parts. I’ll never forget this book because of it.

At one point in the book, near the end, Copperfield becomes depressed. Through all this he remembers one constant, which he, and the reader notice only in passing, as David did until the end, when that becomes the main thing (*review writer forces himself to stop there to prevent spoiler.)

The characters are real people to me, like I’ve been with them and know them.

David Copperfield shares his deepest, most intimate thoughts in the experience. I liked when he refers to, “I can see it now. I see…,” as if you are old acquaintances up late by a fire, sipping tea or coffee and catching up on life, until early hours of the morning, because the book ends, and you have to go back across the sea.

I already miss them. They are as real and loved to me as the characters in The Lord of the Rings, whom I visit again every year, in another turn of Middle Earth’s great Wheel.

Most of all, Copperfield himself, this biblical Job of nineteenth-century England, with such a kind, humble heart, who lives for and loves his friends.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.