...
Show More
Okay, so I adore the Dune series and have done ever since I read Dune for the first time as a teenager, which is why I was so disappointed by how bad this book is. This book is reeeeally bad. At first I thought bad in a fun, wacky sci-fi sort of way, but then it became both boring AND incredibly offensive, and by about 70% I was just powering through, hoping to get to the end so I could be done with it.
The book is ostensibly about Leto's attempt to carry out the "golden path" he foresaw at the end of Children of Dune, a sacrifice which turns him into a giant gross infertile sandworm, and which is important in order to prevent a vaguely alluded to disaster to humanity. (Why was the reveal of the actual potential disaster so low key??? Surely it should be a big deal, as both the reason for Leto's super boring peace empire, and the proof of his own humanity??)
However, there really isn't much plot at all, just the worst kind of pseudo-philosophical pontificating which Herbert confined to a chapter or two in his earlier books. Dune is a novel absolutely bursting with ideas, but none of the ideas in God Emperor of Dune really come together to say anything meaningful, even though it explores a lot of the same themes as the earlier books in the series. Like, reading Dune I thought that Herbert had a really interesting perspective on organized religion and its purpose in society, but reading this book it just seemed like he had a weirdly sexist fixation with female priestesses. This intellectual laziness is compounded by the supposedly incomprehensibly massive intellectual capabilities of the main character who has like a thousand geniuses living in his head, and this makes it impossible to believe in the central conceit of the book, which amounts to a fatal flaw for a sci-fi novel.
As far as I can tell, what the book is ACTUALLY about is Frank Herbert's prejudice and anxieties about sexuality and gender, which he projects onto the characters in really uncomfortable and awkward ways. Maybe I am wrong about this but I DO NOT KNOW HOW ELSE TO EXPLAIN ANYTHING ABOUT THIS BOOK.
It's important to note that Leto is sexually repulsive and has no loins, because this is hammered home to us repeatedly in this book. So, Leto UNCOMFORTABLY PHALLIC Atreides II married his twin sister one time ages ago, and had many unconsummated brides, and shares a love of the soul with his test-tube fiance, and although he can produce no real sperm he carries the metaphorical sperm of the future in his body which he plans to release as tiny pearls of his consciousness during his transformation when he goes Full Sandworm.
Duncan Idaho is super handsome and every single woman of Leto's oversexualised priestess army wants to have his babies, but Leto tells him that his sperm is intended for Siona, which stresses Duncan out because he is not just a stud and wants to be valued for more than just HIS loins. Duncan is alarmed by Leto's bizarre, inaccurate and deeply offensive theory that being in the army makes you sadistic and gay (this is why Leto needs an army of sexually adventurous women who focus all their adoration on him, obvs), because one time Idaho experimented with another guy in his youth. I can't tell if it makes it better or worse for me that Duncan's over the top homophobia comes from a place of repressing his own gay experiences. Everything is so clumsy and heavy-handed. I just can't tell!!
My overriding impression of the book is that it's Weird About Sex, but not in a fun or interesting way, rather in a wearyingly, forcedly, desperately heterosexual way. In the epilogue which tells us about Duncan and Siona's future legacy the people from the future exclaim loudly that they had a lot of sons, because don't you dare forget that the most important thing about these two slightly more interesting than the rest characters is that they ended up PRODUCING MANY MALE HEIRS as a good arranged breeding pair should do!!!! I thought the Bene Gesserit breeding program was another interestingly alien aspect of the world Herbert created but it turns out the concept isn't alien to the author at all; I think actually he just thinks that good relationships are about people breeding according to some appointed scheme. Reading this book is like an open window being slammed shut on your fingers.
Some other things happen in this book: some people rebel pointlessly, some others scheme fruitlessly and at one point a woman orgasms spontaneously from watching Duncan Idaho climb up a wall. Let's just not talk about it.
To give God Emperor of Dune credit where it is due, I laughed quite a lot when I wasn't cringing in horror, and I was very engaged throughout, mostly because I was composing furious rants about Leto Atreides in my head. (Remember how great Leto I was?? And Paul and Chani's tragically dead first baby, also called Leto? It is an OUTRAGE that this deeply inadequate later Leto became the main Leto of the series.) So I nearly gave this book two stars but I didn't because I feel that it's important to recognise how bad it is. As a novel, as a piece of literature, it's awful.
The book is ostensibly about Leto's attempt to carry out the "golden path" he foresaw at the end of Children of Dune, a sacrifice which turns him into a giant gross infertile sandworm, and which is important in order to prevent a vaguely alluded to disaster to humanity. (Why was the reveal of the actual potential disaster so low key??? Surely it should be a big deal, as both the reason for Leto's super boring peace empire, and the proof of his own humanity??)
However, there really isn't much plot at all, just the worst kind of pseudo-philosophical pontificating which Herbert confined to a chapter or two in his earlier books. Dune is a novel absolutely bursting with ideas, but none of the ideas in God Emperor of Dune really come together to say anything meaningful, even though it explores a lot of the same themes as the earlier books in the series. Like, reading Dune I thought that Herbert had a really interesting perspective on organized religion and its purpose in society, but reading this book it just seemed like he had a weirdly sexist fixation with female priestesses. This intellectual laziness is compounded by the supposedly incomprehensibly massive intellectual capabilities of the main character who has like a thousand geniuses living in his head, and this makes it impossible to believe in the central conceit of the book, which amounts to a fatal flaw for a sci-fi novel.
As far as I can tell, what the book is ACTUALLY about is Frank Herbert's prejudice and anxieties about sexuality and gender, which he projects onto the characters in really uncomfortable and awkward ways. Maybe I am wrong about this but I DO NOT KNOW HOW ELSE TO EXPLAIN ANYTHING ABOUT THIS BOOK.
It's important to note that Leto is sexually repulsive and has no loins, because this is hammered home to us repeatedly in this book. So, Leto UNCOMFORTABLY PHALLIC Atreides II married his twin sister one time ages ago, and had many unconsummated brides, and shares a love of the soul with his test-tube fiance, and although he can produce no real sperm he carries the metaphorical sperm of the future in his body which he plans to release as tiny pearls of his consciousness during his transformation when he goes Full Sandworm.
Duncan Idaho is super handsome and every single woman of Leto's oversexualised priestess army wants to have his babies, but Leto tells him that his sperm is intended for Siona, which stresses Duncan out because he is not just a stud and wants to be valued for more than just HIS loins. Duncan is alarmed by Leto's bizarre, inaccurate and deeply offensive theory that being in the army makes you sadistic and gay (this is why Leto needs an army of sexually adventurous women who focus all their adoration on him, obvs), because one time Idaho experimented with another guy in his youth. I can't tell if it makes it better or worse for me that Duncan's over the top homophobia comes from a place of repressing his own gay experiences. Everything is so clumsy and heavy-handed. I just can't tell!!
My overriding impression of the book is that it's Weird About Sex, but not in a fun or interesting way, rather in a wearyingly, forcedly, desperately heterosexual way. In the epilogue which tells us about Duncan and Siona's future legacy the people from the future exclaim loudly that they had a lot of sons, because don't you dare forget that the most important thing about these two slightly more interesting than the rest characters is that they ended up PRODUCING MANY MALE HEIRS as a good arranged breeding pair should do!!!! I thought the Bene Gesserit breeding program was another interestingly alien aspect of the world Herbert created but it turns out the concept isn't alien to the author at all; I think actually he just thinks that good relationships are about people breeding according to some appointed scheme. Reading this book is like an open window being slammed shut on your fingers.
Some other things happen in this book: some people rebel pointlessly, some others scheme fruitlessly and at one point a woman orgasms spontaneously from watching Duncan Idaho climb up a wall. Let's just not talk about it.
To give God Emperor of Dune credit where it is due, I laughed quite a lot when I wasn't cringing in horror, and I was very engaged throughout, mostly because I was composing furious rants about Leto Atreides in my head. (Remember how great Leto I was?? And Paul and Chani's tragically dead first baby, also called Leto? It is an OUTRAGE that this deeply inadequate later Leto became the main Leto of the series.) So I nearly gave this book two stars but I didn't because I feel that it's important to recognise how bad it is. As a novel, as a piece of literature, it's awful.