Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
35(35%)
4 stars
36(36%)
3 stars
28(28%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
“I have been bent and broken, but–I hope–into a better shape.”

Dickens, like Shakespeare, lives in a genre all of his own. We have the term Shakespearian just as we have the term Dickensian, because they aren’t simply writers. They mastered the creative form of storytelling, and shaped history by doing so. Knowing this, I have always fought this feeling of trepidation about starting my Dickensian journey. What if I don’t like his writing? What if the length of his books makes the experience draining? What if…?
Well, I can finally tell you from my own “Great” experience, that Charles Dickens is worth more than the praise he has already received. Praise that has outlasted time itself, and the countless number of books that have been published since. My “great expectations” for this book, and for Dickens as a writer, not only met those expectations, but surpassed them.
This book was a thrill to read. The humor paired so well with the more dark aspects of the story. “Before I had been standing at the window five minutes, they somehow conveyed to me that they were all toadies and humbugs, but that each of them pretended not to know that the others were toadies and humbugs, because the admission that he or she did know it would have made him or her out to be a toady and humbug.” I laughed at that line for about 5 whole minutes.
His descriptions made it feel like I could reach out and touch the yellowed fabrics of Miss Havisham’s rooms. “But, I saw that everything within my view which ought to be white, had been white long ago, and had lost its lustre, and was faded and yellow.”
The characters were unique and felt like they belonged outside of just your everyday fictional character. “‘Here’s Mr. Pip, aged parent,’ said Wemmick, ‘and I wish you could hear his name. Nod away at him, Mr. Pip; that’s what he likes. Nod away at him, if you please, like winking!’’... “‘If you’re not tired Mr. Pip–though I know it’s tiring to strangers–would you tip him one more? You can’t think how it pleases him.’”
The way Dickens uses similes and metaphors to make the ordinary extraordinary, was a literary device that I fawned over from the beginning. “I had seen the damp lying on the outside of my little window, as if some goblin had been crying there all night, and using the window for a pocket-handkerchief.”
I wish I could share every quote that I fell in love with, but I might as well just transcribe the whole thing. Here are two more quotes that I fell in love with, “Heaven knows we need never be ashamed of our tears, for they are rain upon the blinding dust of earth, overlying our hard hearts.”
“Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation of the first link on one memorable day.”
Something else that took me by surprise, besides watching all of the mysterious events unravel, was how eerie and ominous the book became the more it progressed.
Reaching the last few pages of this book, there was a textual note at the bottom which read, “ *Here begins Dickens’s new ending, as rewritten just before initial publication.” This “new ending” was so gratifying to read and made the whole story come together so perfectly. I wondered how Dickens could have written it any other way. Then the original ending had an editor's note which read, “At the urging of his friend, the novelist Edward Bulwer Lytton, Dicken changed the original unhappy ending of Great Expectations to a “more acceptable” one…” Then, after reading the original ending scene I became utterly speechless. I had no words, because Dickens holds them all.
I find it miraculous that people can write these funny looking lines called letters, form groups of them into what is known as sentences, and be able to saturate them with human emotion. This book made me feel, and feel deeply. This is the start of a very passionate love affair, between me and the works of Charles Dickens.

April 25,2025
... Show More
هل سنكون سعداء عندما تتحقق امالنا العريضة؟؟سؤال مرعب قد يدور في أذهان المتفلسفين منا..
طلاب مدارس اللغات يعلمون ان هناك 4تعاونوا على تعذيبهم..شكسبير..والأختين برونتي..و تشارلز ديكنز

و لكن تظل لامال عريضة مكانا في عقلى و قلبي ..فمن خلالها تعرفت على أسلوب النقد البريطاني المنظم. .وأيضا تعرفت على جزء كبير من حياة تشارلز ديكنز. .. فهو مثل البطل فيليب بيريب. عرف الفقر طويلا في طفولته بسبب سجن والده

مع فيليب عرفت مشاعر اليتم والفقر بدون مبالغة
و لم يحرمنا من الأكشن .. فنجد بيب يقابل مجرما هاربا..و يساعده مرغما..يقع في حب صبية مثله في سن 12 و لكنها تحتقره لفقره..تماما مثلما فعلت ماريا بندل بديكنز .تتغير حياته بفضل راعي مجهول ينفق على تعليمه و يوظفه. .فيصيبه الغرور ..و يتعالى على من ربوه..ثم تتحطم اماله عندما يعلم من هو راعيه

..لتتوالى الاحداث..التي تؤكد انه مهما فعلنا ..فسعادتنا و شقاؤنا بايدى الاخرين .للاسف

لا تخلو من الرعب بسبب تلك الانسة الابدية ..ميس هافيشام..التى لم تخلع
April 25,2025
... Show More
"I have been bent and broken, but - I hope - into a better shape."

دیکنز از اون دست از نویسنده‌هایی هستش که اگه کتش رو تکون می‌داد، به جای گرد و غبار از اون داستان و قصه بر زمین می‌ریخت. نویسنده‌ای که یک شب پس از جر و بحث با زنش از خانه بیرون زد و هفت الی هشت ساعتی مشغول قدم زدن در لندن شد و به شهری خیره شد که هیچکس به جز خودش نتونسته اون‌قدر خوب توصیفش کنه. نویسنده‌ای که یه کلاغ به اسم گریپ به عنوان حیوون خونگی داشت و هربار که کلاغ می‌مرد، کلاغ دیگه‌ای می‌گرفت و دوباره همین اسم رو روش می‌‌ذاشت و بعدها تو یه دیداری با آلن پو که گریپ رو با خودش برده بود باعث شد که اون شعر Raven پو تحت تاثیر ایشون خلق بشه. بسیار پر کار بود و کتاب‌هایی زیاد و حجیمی نوشت و دنیایی رو ساخت به اسم خودش، از زاویه‌ای به رخدادها و انسان‌ها و زندگی‌ها و عشق‌ها و اندوه‌ها و سرشکستگی‌های جهان نگاه کرد که امروز می‌توان اون رو جهان دیکنز نامید.

من قبل از نوشتن ریویو معمولاً ریویوهای دیگران رو می‌خونم. متاسفانه در مورد کتاب آرزوهای بزرگ هیچ‌کدوم از ریویوهای فارسی یا حتی خیلی از انگلیسی‌ها رو دوست ندارم. توی یکی از ریویوهای فارسی نوشته شده بود که شخصیت‌های دیکنز غیر واقعی هستن چون مهربون یا جدی یا بدجنس‌ تشریف دارن. من نمی‌دونم ما در چه دنیایی زندگی می‌کنیم که مهربون بودن یا جدی بودن از ما انسان‌هایی غیرواقعی می‌سازه! اما شخصیت‌های دیکنز غیرواقعی نیستن، درست‌تر هستش که بگیم دیکنز در شخصیت‌پردازی تیپ‌های شخصیتی رقم می‌زنه و اتفاقاً در خارج اسم‌های شخصیت‌های دیکنز معمولاً به نوعی صفت و تیپ شخصیتی در زبان محاوره‌ای انگلیسی تبدیل شدن و دیکنز به این کار بسیار معروفه.

چیزی که خیلی من رو به سمت خوندن آرزوهای بزرگ سوق داد، کتاب بازی فرشته ثافون و شخصیت داوید و حرف‌هاش در مورد این کتاب بود. آرزوهای بزرگ از اون دست از کتاب‌هاست که برای توصیفش بهترین لغتی که به ذهنم می‌رسه "دلنشین" هست. یک داستانی که از کودکی پیپ آغاز می‌شه و فراز‌و‌نشیب‌های زندگی اون رو در بر می‌گیره. پیپ برخلاف دیگر قهرمان‌های داستان‌های دیکنز خیلی قهرمان به‌نظر نمی‌رسه و بسیار سرشکسته‌تر از باقی هست و کشمکش‌هایی که در طی کتاب تجربه می‌کنه باعث می‌شه که متوجه بشیم دیکنز در زیر اون شخصیت‌پردازی نمادواری که داره، وارد مرحله شخصیت‌پردازی پیچیده شده و داره روان شخصیتش رو هم دچار دگرگونی و چالش می‌کنه.

آرزوهای بزرگ یکی از بهترین نمونه نثرها و توصیفات ادبیات انگلیسی به حساب می‌آد و راجع‌به ظرافت‌های نثر دیکنز شاید بشه کُلی صحبت کرد و خط به خط طنز و غم و زاویه‌ی دید ملموس و تازه‌ی دیکنز رو زیر ذره‌بین قرار داد و بهش فکر کرد. دیکنز هرجا که می‌خواست می‌تونست خواننده رو به شدت احساساتی بکنه و به واسطه این تسلط نثرش مونولوگ‌های بسیار فوق‌العاده‌ای رو رقم بزنه.


اسم کتاب رو من همیشه خیلی دوست داشتم، "آرزوهای بزرگ"، این‌که شاید هرکدوم از ما در دورانی از زندگی‌مون همچین خیالاتی در سر داشتیم و زندگی با ظرافت خاص خودش یک جایی اون تصویر رو از هم پاشوند. خود کتاب هم حکایتی از همین انتخاب‌ها و رها کردن چیزهایی هست که برامون عزیزن تا بعد از اون بتونیم به سمت دنیای آرزوهای بزرگی که توی سرمون هست قدم برداریم. و در نهایت دلتنگ همون دلخوشی‌های کوچکی بشیم که پیپ توی گوشه‌ی خونه‌ی خواهرش در کنار بخاری کسب می‌کرد.

تو اکثر ریویوهای منفی انگلیسی این کتاب ذکر شده بود که داستان خسته‌کننده و حوصله‌سربر هستش و از یه زاویه‌ای ممکنه شماهم توی این حالت قرار بگیرین. اگه به شخصیت‌پردازی و داستان‌گویی پرجزئیات دیکنز اهمیتی نمی‌دین احتمالاً از این کتاب لذت آنچنانی نخواهید برد. چرا که روایت با این‌که شما رو به داخل پیرنگ داستان می‌کشونه اما جذابیت و کشش کافی برای یه نفس خوندن یا این‌که نتونین از خوندن کتاب دست بکشین رو نداره. نه، این کتاب رو باید با تعهد و حوصله بخونین و در همون جزئیات ریز متوجه مهارت بسیار بالای دیکنز در داستان‌‌سرایی خواهید شد.

در پایان این یکی از احساسی‌ترین رمان‌هایی بود که امسال خوندم و من با این‌که اصلاً و شاید به ندرت با یک کتاب بغضم ممکنه ��گیره توی صحنه‌ی آخر این کتاب داشت اشکم در می‌اومد..
در کنار این مورد این کتاب بامزه هم هست و واقعاً لحظاتی آدم رو به خنده میندازه.
من خودم احساس می‌کنم که محبوب‌ترین کتاب دیکنز برای من یه کتابی بین داستان دو شهر یا دیوید کاپرفیلد یا خانه قانون‌زده باشه اما با این حال آرزوهای بزرگ جزو مهم‌ترین آثار آقای دیکنز عزیز هستش و از اون کتاب‌هایی که شاید بهتر باشه هرچند سال برای بازخوانی کردنش دوباره صفحه‌ی اولش رو بخونی که نوشته: 《نام خانوادگی پدرم پیریپ بود...》و من قطعاً در آینده برای یه بار دیگه خوندن این کتاب برمی‌گردم و مطمئنم دفعه‌ی بعد بیشتر لذت می‌برم.


در باب ترجمه کتاب:
ترجمه‌ی ابراهیم یونسی از این کتاب دیکنز افتضاح‌ترین و بدترین ترجمه و لحنی است که در عمرم دیدم و در نتیجه اصلاً راجع‌به ترجمه‌ی ایشون حرفی نمی‌زنم. ترجمه‌ی حمیدرضا بلوچ رو در بعضی جاها با متن اصلی مقایسه کردم و متاسفانه از حیث زیبایی توصیف و گاهاً فهمیدن منظور دیکنز ضعف‌هایی داشت و بعضی جاها حین ترجمه چند کلمه‌ای رو در بازگردانی جا می‌انداخت و در نهایت من نمی‌تونم بهش عنوانی بیشتر از "کار راه انداز" بدم. امیدوارم که در آینده ترجمه‌ی شایسته‌تری از این اثر منتشر بشه. پیشنهاد من خوندن نثر اصلیه، با این‌که سختی‌های خودش رو داره اما بخشی از لذت کتاب توی همون نثر پنهون شده.
April 25,2025
... Show More
دیکنز نویسنده‌ای رئالیست است. او در عصر ویکتوریایی به طرز شگفت‌انگیزی آثاری برجسته با سبک اجتماعی خلق کرد. او در آثارش با زبانی قدرتمند از دغدغه‌های اجتماعی روز سخن می‌گوید. دیکنز به خوبی قشر فقیر و طبقات پایین اجتماع را می‌شناسد.آرزوهای بزرگ را می‌توان به نوعی زندگی‌نامهٔ خودنوشت شخص دیکنز نیز دانست که همچون آثار دیگرش تجربیات تلخ و شیرین او از زندگی و مردم را نمایان می‌سازد...
والدین چارلز نسبت به او بی توجه بودند و این مسئله او را بسیار آزار می‌داد. چارلز بیشتر وقت خود را بیرون از خانه و با خواندن کتاب‌های گوناگون می‌گذراند. تجربه‌های او از دوران گوناگون زندگیش در داستان‌ها و مقاله‌هایش بازتاب یافتند و آزردگی ناشی از وضعیت خود و مردمان طبقه ی كارگر، یكی از درونمایه‌های اصلی آثار اواست.
دیکنز به عنوان پدیده ادبی دوران خود شناخته می‌شد و به دلیل واقع‌گرایی ، سبک نگارش، توصیف های منحصر به فرد ، خلق شخصیت‌های به یاد ماندنی و نقادی اجتماعی مورد تمجید واقع شده است.
آرزوهای بزرگ از بهترین آثار دیکنز است که در نگارش این رمان از درونمایه‌های تقابل اشراف و طبقه فرودست، عشق و وحشت، قتل و جنایت می‌گوید.
او در این کتاب به واسطه اعمال و رفتار شخصیت‌ها صفات بد مثل طمع، کینه، سنگدلی و خساست را در مقابل صفات نیکویی مثل قناعت، جوانمردی، بخشش و فداکاری را نشان می‌دهد. این همان تصویر آرمانی و واقع‌گرایانه‌ای است که باعث درخشش آثار دیکنز در جهان شده است.
این رمان نشان می دهد که مالکیت و ثروت نمی توانند درون شخصیت ها را تغییر دهند و پیدا کردن خود واقعی، نیاز به طی کردن مسیری طولانی دارد، مسیری که البته در نهایت انسان را به آگاهی می رساند....
بسیاری از آثار دیکنز نخست در قالب داستان‌های دنباله دار درنشریه‌ها چاپ می شدند و او اغلب، طرح و سیر تکاملی کاراکتر‌های خود را براساس بازخورد‌ها اصلاح می‌کرد. شاید اگر اینگونه نبود، با پایان بندی مطلوب تری در این کتاب روبه رو می شدیم ...آنچنانکه مد نظر خود نویسنده بود....

خواندن آثار دیکنز به زبان اصلی و ترجمه تفاوت‌هایی دارد. چرا که منتقل کردن سبک زبانی و صنایع ادبی خاص دیکنز به فارسی کمی مشکل است و به همین دلیل ، ترجمه ی عنایت الله شکیباپور به هیچ عنوان توصیه نمی شود ، چون نتوانسته نثر توانمند و بازی های کلامی نویسنده را به خوبی انتقال دهد...
April 25,2025
... Show More
The first 5* this year.

Some books are better to read later. I am very happy that I read Great Expectations now and not when I was at school. I probably wouldn't had enjoyed then and It would have been such a pity. I think I am becoming quite a fan of Victorian literature.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Starting with "Great Expectations" that I will finish it this time.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Note: this 2 stars is a 25 year ago high school required reading memory. I may do a reread of this some day so the two star is subject to change.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Thoroughly brilliant, as always. I get fonder of this one with each reread. Beautifully written and fascinating to the core!
April 25,2025
... Show More
Probably my second favorite Dickens so far.

What is remarkable about reading this novel is that while it begins with a lot of archetypical characteristics of a Dickensian novel, mostly all of the characters defied what I expected of them. Not only are they entertaining and expertly written, but also incredibly realistic. Miss Havisham, Pip, Estella, and more start off in their tiny little boxes of stereotypes but grow into layered characters with more complexity then I would’ve imagined.

I also have to admire the fact that this is one of the rare Dickens I’ve read in which Estella especially defies the ‘angelic’ trope. The ending also, in my opinion at least, is neither ‘happy’ nor ‘sad’ but again very realistic and satisfactory. Pip and Estella make mistakes along the way but eventually grow into themselves, as is the case with the entire novel itself.

Overall, I loved this book.
April 25,2025
... Show More
I had many "great expectations" of this novel, having read so many great reviews. But I was totally disappointed. It is rather a hard business to be disappointed in a work of a literary giant, which is also a work that was much acclaimed by many readers over the years, and I tried my best to like it. But, despite my trying, it wasn't an enjoyable read.

This book is one of the popular works of Dickens and is widely read. And everyone is more or less aware of the storyline and the characters. The sinister household of Miss Havisham is not something to be easily forgotten. The creepy feeling you get when you enter the household with Pip will stay with you for quite a while. Apart from the odd old lady, there is Magwitch, the convict who contribute heavily to the eerie feeling you get all along. If I liked one thing in this novel, it is this eerie, foreboding sensation that enveloped the story giving it a suspenseful touch.

As to the story, I felt it so nonsensical, to be honest. Begging pardon from the fans of this novel, I have to say I couldn't make head or tails of it except that it was a coming-of-age story and of a young boy's metamorphosis from one who is selfish and ambitious to a genuinely good and kind man. If this was the "great expectation" that we were to look for, I wasn't impressed.

The characters were alright, and I liked some of them, especially the eccentric ones despite my apathy toward the story. But Dickens's writing, something I always admired, surprisingly worn me out. It was too verbose and took ages to come to a point. Perhaps, it may be due to my lack of interest in the story, but, for the first time, I felt tired reading his elaborate writing!

On the meritorious side, however, it touches on certain isolated social sections and brings to light those who are unobtrusive. I always have admired Dickens for his boldness in digging deeper into society. But if there were other merits to this novel, I was honestly blind to them. So, for all these reasons, I couldn't enjoy this great novel by Dickens. To me, it is my least favourite Dickens.
April 25,2025
... Show More
I've actually read this quintessentially Victorian novel twice. The first time was as required reading in junior high school, where I liked it from the get-go; the second time was as an adult, back in 1997. It remains one of my favorites (among the ones I've actually read) of the novels of Dickens, a writer whose work I was first introduced to as a grade school kid, and have long counted as a favorite author. Written serially in 1860-61, it's a mature Dickens work (his second-to-last completed novel). By the time of its composition, his unequaled mastery of characterization, dry humor, social consciousness, and ability to evoke powerful emotion and to conjure totally realistic scenes and situations even while writing in a thoroughly Romantic style, were already honed to their fullest perfection. But he also brought to this novel a focused moral message, which is more marked here than in some of his earlier works, such as David Copperfield, and the classic simplicity of a basically linear plot (albeit with some tightly controlled and dovetailed subplots). And in the person of Pip, he gives us here a protagonist who's dynamic --that is, who changes in significant ways besides aging and altered circumstances, unlike, for instance, the eponymous heroes of David Copperfield or Oliver Twist. For this reason, it has a stronger effect on the reader (or at least this reader) than either of those novels. (I rank it in the same class as my other favorite Dickens works, A Tale of Two Cities and A Christmas Carol.)

Although David Copperfield is usually considered Dicken's most autobiographical work, Michael Slater (who contributes the introduction to the 1992 Knopf edition I read) makes the case that this novel represents "a far more ruthlessly honest fictional use of his personal life." It's certainly the case that he was born in the same part of England as Pip, the marsh country around the southern coast, and evokes that setting here with a vividness born of personal familiarity. (The same goes for his ability to bring the teeming, sooty urban jungle of London to life.) Again in Slater's words, "The deep concerns of Dickens life that feature so prominently in the novel...[include]...concealment of a shameful prison secret about one's past [his father spent time in debtor's prison], love for an unobtainable woman [Ellen Ternan], English class snobbery and the debate about what constitutes a 'gentleman,' the life of the imagination, the father/son relationship, bad mothering, and the moral and psychological consequences of brooding on past wrongs and betrayals."

It's worth noting that this is the only Dickens novel, to my knowledge, for which he wrote two entirely different endings, the original more "realistic" one (written in advance of publication) and a more ambiguous one which he wrote on the suggestion of his friend Bulwer-Lytton, and used in the published version. Both editions I've read included both (the original ending being added as an appendix), and this seems to be a common practice. So the reader has a sort of "choose your own ending" option. :-) (Personally, I prefer the Bulwer-Lytton approach --as Dickens apparently did himself, considering his decision to publish it and not the original!) If readers have a settled dislike or mental block towards Victorian prose, they won't like this book; yes, it's wordy (though, contrary to what some people believe, Dickens was NOT paid by the word for his writing), and the diction can be elaborate. But if that isn't a deal-breaker, this offers a great tale of Gothic atmosphere, lethal danger, intrigue and secrets, a window into a fascinating and vanished time --and most of all, Dickens' deepest exploration of what really matters (and what doesn't matter) in human life, and what makes for human happiness. (And what doesn't.)

1.) Note: A more in-depth discussion of the novel, with some significant insights and interesting background information about, for instance, the real-life models for some of Dickens' characters and settings, can be found here: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/... .

2.) Note: Of the many movie and TV adaptations of this novel, the one I personally recommend is the 1999 version starring Ioan Gruffudd as Pip (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167187/ ). That one adopts the published ending as its conclusion.
April 25,2025
... Show More
It is almost hard to believe that Dickens stays the same when you read him on several occasions in your life. Somehow, the words and their meanings seem completely different. Obviously, it is my life experience that has changed, not the story. I find that to be one of Dickens' major achievements: the storytelling excellence that captures a teenager's need for complicated plots as well as the cynical grown-up's wish for reflection on human behaviour.

Great Expectations has both, and I found myself deeply engaged in the development of the immature character of the narrator, amazed at the techniques Dickens used to show the treachery and snobbery of the person who is in charge of telling the story - not an easy task, but wonderfully mastered. How is Pip going to show his faithlessness towards Joe if he is telling the story from a perspective where he is unaware of it? Dickens does it not so much through flashback moments (as in David Copperfield), but rather by describing the setting in a way that gives the reader more knowledge than the narrator. Very interesting.

And yes, I enjoyed the drama of the plot as well. There is no one like Dickens to make you shiver in the face of convicts, or shake inside Newgate prison!

Hard times ahead, picking another Dickens to read or re-read!

Update on the night I am wrapping up Bleak House: it is now my son's turn to start Great Expectations, and he is reading it for the first time, a young teenager. I can't wait to disagree with him in the same pleasant way we disagreed on David Copperfield.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.