...
Show More
Vile tale dressed up in Wharton's brilliant prose. Several times, from early on to the last part of the book, I nearly gave up on it. Indeed, I wished I hadn't read it.
Wharton's "Magnum Opus," as she considered this one, is wildly different from her other works. The central character, Undine Spragg, is a gold-digging narcissist with sociopathic tendencies. Undie, as she's called, works her way through one marriage after another, leaving a trail of devastation and even death in her wake.
This might be the only time I can remember in a novel wishing to reach through the pages and dope-slap the heroine. But by the time her child came along and the neglect and abuse toward him was recorded, I was so disgusted I was more than ready for the book to end. But it didn't. It kept going on and on, with the main character unchanged, unrepentant, learning nothing and gaining no wisdom in her self-absorption.
For a piece of literature one hundred years old, the disregard for marriage and the egocentric nature of the main characters hit a little too close to modern home. I know a couple people in "real life" who mirror Undine, and they've duped half the population like she has, while those around them suffer immeasurably. Perhaps this was the chief reason I couldn't appreciate the book - it was a sordid depiction of the worst of modern America.
Wharton's assessment and definition of the "custom of the country," given midway through the book, is/was only a slice of American society's problems facing marriage and the differences between the sexes. The book in its humanism describes only a fraction of the real issue at hand in not understanding or honoring the nature of covenant, nor the selfishness of at least one party that is always the root cause in divorce.
The unanswered question Wharton poses that I was most curious about in all of this related to Mr. Spragg. Wharton alluded throughout the novel several times to his masonic emblem and the occult. I kept waiting to hear the tie-in between Undine's manipulative ways and her father's freemasonry, which would have been interesting (generational curse?). But, that end was left dangling.
All in all, Wharton's writing is genius, but this particular story was too awful and depressing, and could have been shortened by about two hundred pages. Moreover, in one century, the degenerative tendencies Wharton describes in the nouveaux riche have descended full-force to the commoners in the population as well - who, ironically, often can't "afford" to be divorced, but do it anyway.
Wharton's "Magnum Opus," as she considered this one, is wildly different from her other works. The central character, Undine Spragg, is a gold-digging narcissist with sociopathic tendencies. Undie, as she's called, works her way through one marriage after another, leaving a trail of devastation and even death in her wake.
This might be the only time I can remember in a novel wishing to reach through the pages and dope-slap the heroine. But by the time her child came along and the neglect and abuse toward him was recorded, I was so disgusted I was more than ready for the book to end. But it didn't. It kept going on and on, with the main character unchanged, unrepentant, learning nothing and gaining no wisdom in her self-absorption.
For a piece of literature one hundred years old, the disregard for marriage and the egocentric nature of the main characters hit a little too close to modern home. I know a couple people in "real life" who mirror Undine, and they've duped half the population like she has, while those around them suffer immeasurably. Perhaps this was the chief reason I couldn't appreciate the book - it was a sordid depiction of the worst of modern America.
Wharton's assessment and definition of the "custom of the country," given midway through the book, is/was only a slice of American society's problems facing marriage and the differences between the sexes. The book in its humanism describes only a fraction of the real issue at hand in not understanding or honoring the nature of covenant, nor the selfishness of at least one party that is always the root cause in divorce.
The unanswered question Wharton poses that I was most curious about in all of this related to Mr. Spragg. Wharton alluded throughout the novel several times to his masonic emblem and the occult. I kept waiting to hear the tie-in between Undine's manipulative ways and her father's freemasonry, which would have been interesting (generational curse?). But, that end was left dangling.
All in all, Wharton's writing is genius, but this particular story was too awful and depressing, and could have been shortened by about two hundred pages. Moreover, in one century, the degenerative tendencies Wharton describes in the nouveaux riche have descended full-force to the commoners in the population as well - who, ironically, often can't "afford" to be divorced, but do it anyway.