This was what I wanted it to be the first time I read it. It is a good thing not all tears are an evil, cause the words of the last few pages got pretty blurry

9.4

Centouno

There was an old linguist called Tolkien
Who by setting strange creatures a-talkin'
Did prove to the world
A pen’s mightier than a sword
For even I wish I could speak me some Orckian

A sinistra... / A destra...


.

i am tempted to go out and buy a wobbly table just so I can put this book to good use.

Libro epico e assolutamente spettacolare (anche se, in alcuni punti, domina la noia) che, merito anche delle sue quasi 1.400 pagine, mi ha impegnato nella sua lettura per quasi un mese… ma, alla fine, come avrete capito, non ne sono affatto pentito. Un lavoro, per farla breve, che ha moltissimi significati morali (e religiosi): infatti, si parla del classico scontro tra il bene (qui rappresentato da Bilbo e Frodo Baggins, i più improbabili degli eroi) ed il male (impersonato da Sauron, il "Signore" degli Anelli); si parla di guerra, coraggio, tradimenti, determinazione, rispetto, fedeltà assoluta e, soprattutto, amore.
Fiaba senza tempo con un'ottima descrizione dei protagonisti (ma di qualcuno, specie i personaggi secondari, io ne avrei fatto tranquillamente a meno) e dei paesaggi fiabeschi e incantati… con la grande mappa (un foglio quadrato, di oltre 50 cm per lato, allegata al libro), davvero notevole e ben realizzata. Menzione speciale, inoltre, per la narrazione delle scene di guerre: scorrendo la lettura sembrava di stare davvero su un campo di battaglia.
Da leggere, e quasi quasi da studiare, tutta la parte finale del libro (ossia le appendici) con la cronologia dei re della Terra di mezzo, il calendario e il calcolo storico degli anni, i vari alberi genealogici e, addirittura, la grammatica e la pronuncia delle varie lingue delle razze incontrate in tutto il libro (elfi e nani su tutte).
[https://lastanzadiantonio.blogspot.co...]

not a review and there probably won't be one any time soon. i also won't be climbing Mount Everest in the near future. but here are some cool illustrations that i found and want to share.

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

n  n

World of the Ring by Jian Guo

Tolkien is my favorite author. I am not sure what else to express as I need time, the materials, and characters.

Out of the wreck rose the Black Rider, tall and threatening, towering above her. With a cry of hatred that stung the very ears like venom he let fall his mace. Her shield was shivered in many pieces, and her arm was broken; she stumbled to her knees. He bent over her like a cloud, and his eyes glittered; he raised his mace to kill.

One of the best books ever. Stirred the embers of more imaginations than can be measured. Found a way to reach something vital but ineffable inside millions of different souls. Presented the world with Sauron, his Nazgûl, and the Balrog to tip the scales of evil; Gandalf, Galadriel, and the stalwart gentlehobbit Frodo to lend ballast to those of good; whereas, with Tom Bombadil, who really knows what trippy trail that earth-bound spirit is blazing: and who the can top all of that? It first spoke to me when my fantastic fifth grade teacher chose The Fellowship of the Ring for our classroom reading period, and I've never looked back.

There are curiosities that abound within the trilogy, not least in that the opening chapters of The Fellowship of the Ring would not be out of place as a direct sequel to The Hobbit, whereas by the time we have reached Rivendell, the entire tone of the book has been altered: become more adult, more serious and darker, possessed of a sense of finality and portents of an end to wondrous things that comes to permeate the remainder of this questing original. By the time we get to the Scouring of the Shire at the close of the third book, it is understood that even the bucolic goodwill and perduring staidness of the Hobbit realm has been stirred, shaken, even broken in parts, and cannot go back to what it was. What's more, with every subsequent reading I found it more difficult to accept that the Nazgûl failed so miserably in their great and urgent task of taking back the Ring from Frodo, even with Strider/Aragorn in the picture; that these ferocious sorcerer-spectres were driven away—all nine at once, mind, which few men had ever proven able to withstand—with the Ring well within their grasp, well, it truly tests my suspension of disbelief. With that said, though, how many other parts of the story fail? Precious few, I think, particularly within the context of a transitional world linked to the ancient and primordial past only by the maintenance of Elvish magic, and that contingent upon the very survival of the One Ring that they would most wish to see utterly unmade. The trilogy represents a final outreach of the elder races ere the full and overwhelming dominion of Man; and the evil incarnate within such demi-gods as Morgoth and Sauron, its essence imbued within the very earth itself and permeating the susceptible souls of the new ruling race of free-choosing (and hence, free-damning) mortal (wo)men will in the future prove just as effective a corruptive and destructive force without the dominating presence of an avataric darkling lord to wield it from a centre of power.

But what interests me these days, more than the well-known story itself, is trying to suss what constitutes the enduring spell that TLOTR casts upon its legion of readers, whether experienced hands or rookies new to its peculiar fantastic delights. Is it a yearning to escape a world of routine and rational technodemocracy where everything seems sullied by the pursuit of the dollar and tomorrow will be but a twin of today, which was sibling to its brethren of the day before? A world absent of miracles and beauty that stirs the very body to fealty? Where lawyers abound to clarify the legal implications of every action that falls outside of the commonplace or expected? Where the rich are not bound by a noblesse oblige to fight to protect those who labour on their behalf, but hire those selfsame workers to do the fighting for them? Where the powerful rules that uphold modern science can be replaced by naught but the mystical exertion of a rich spirit's will - a Nietzschean surmounting of the barriers to controlling the energies of a nature that, to us, seems distant and out of sync? Where things like honor and blood ties bound people together with a lasting surety and strength that would be incomprehensible in our modern fragmented neighborhoods, where you can wander through blocks of crammed apartments and dirty houses without meeting with a single smile or nodding acknowledgement? Where evil, though ever lurking to tempt men away from the path of truth, could be traced to its roots in the rebellious uprising of cosmogonic spirits, blackened godlings whose lusts for chaos and dominance seeped into the human psyche through a process of corrupting what, in its original nature, was pure and fulgent? Beats me - but it's got to be something, because Tolkien's trilogy is one of those rare books that, it seems, will never be in danger of being removed from the presses.

In an irony-drenched and übersceptical postmodern civilization it must strike many as absurd that there exists an insatiable demand for this tripartite tale penned in the manner of an irascible, waddling county squire whose tropes and forms—slavishly reworked and rehashed in the reams of fantasy fiction that has been churned out since its initial publication—hearken back to the foundational mythologies of patriarchal oppression, class division, and romantic irrationality that it was both hoped and expected the postwar years would have superseded. I've read critiques from the likes of Moorcock - n  Epic Poohn - and, while able to understand why he dismisses it, simply cannot manage to summon any commiseration for the repugnance he feels. First and foremost, the tale grew out of the imaginative legends Tolkien had concocted as backdrop for his linguistic creations—and coming as he did from a proud and tradition-bound Roman-Catholic background; and pursuing as he did his studies in the philological field of Anglo-Saxon language and literature; and enjoying as he did various ancient and medieval mythologies and the fantastic weavings of influential forbears such as Dunsany, MacDonald, and Eddison; well, can there be any surprise that his brilliant questing trilogy evoked calls to Welsh faeries, Norse dragons, Scots trolls, Finnish hunters, comfortable and sturdy Midland farms, Gaelic heroes, and a loving but distant God beyond a host of angels whose essence devolves downward? It is hard to fault the man for pursuing his own personal passions and visions and putting them into a textual form for which he expected, at best, a modest return—why not swing, rather, at a public that—from the very first printing—lapped it up with all the eagerness of a thirsty tribe wandered in from an exodus amidst a particularly sere desert?

And therein lies the rub: it galls such as Moorcock that one generation after another yields en masse an avid affection and enthusiasm to what he considers a frivolous and archaic bit of stuffiness and prudery and dusty parochialism set to the service of an aulde England of division and oppression that it would be far better to have left behind. He wonders, as do others, at what can be hale about a tale that deftly avoids anything beyond the faintest intimations of sexuality and, for the most part, relegates women to a gender-specified subservience and passivity as Middle-Earth window-dressing; that appears to embrace the pernicious prejudice of the inherent superiority of white North European culture; that avoids any avowal of the economic, religious, or political structures and systems that must inevitably have been at play and working their damaging and divisive effects upon such a vast civilization; that fluffs and puffs with trite, sentimental songs and portentous magic and heavy-lidded memories the better to disguise the utter irrelevance and unseriousness of what is unfolding, the priggish and confining morality that puts everyone in their place—bowing to the gods and to one's social superiors—whilst upholding the aristocratic warrior as the virtuous ideal; that separates good and evil in a manner that provides a comforting and ready accounting for the myriad ills of the world, but which actually trivializes these ethical issues, especially in an age that witnessed the horrors of the holocaust and communist purges.

How can this be? How can an enlightened and post-capitalist postwar society continue to be enthralled by an updated version of timeworn mythologies—the latest of which ripened during the Dark Ages—shaped with the hammer of mothballed and morbid uppercrust morality of the sort that harumphs conspicuously and comes bearing bow-ties? Perhaps for some of the reasons I listed at the start of this review. Escapist fare has always been popular, but there seems to be as much, if not more of a hunger for the fantastic the more the trappings of the latter fade from our view. Modern society is one bound to the clock, ofttimes divided and parceled out down to the very minute; one in which we spend hours every day idling in a car, riding an elevator, waiting in queues, sitting at a desk, pushing a cart, with productivity and efficiency forever on the increase and a sense of who we are, where we are going, why we are on that journey, what we are meant to accomplish along the way and how we are to achieve these goals—with the very knowledge of our mortality, the ephemeral nature of all our achievements, staring us full-on in the face even when we deign to look away—eludes our grasp like the mists wafted forth on a humid spring morning.

To be taken away to an invented world wherein everything serves some manner of purpose and greater goods actually carry an immediate import and eternal consequence, where the enemy is implacable and can be neither appeased nor reasoned with but only defeated—Nazis in cloaks and armed with swords—and magic is suzerain over realms where twentieth-century science holds sway, where love is inflamed within the arterial passions of the romantic, perduring and encompassing though it progresses within tropes of courtship and calling interwoven with the streams of fate, where petty beings from the outliers of a world contested by mighty powers prove the enduring significance of the strength and fidelity of the individual will over seemingly stronger currents sourced within the misty recesses of time and bearing loftier lineages, where the freedoms cherished are not those currently stressed and promised by our political professionals and the bonds of honor hold straighter than those we perceive in our own lives, where those in power, though bowed beneath the weight of shadow-laden years, might yet endeavor to do what serves the world and not just their immediate self-interest; all of this must carry some powerful, primeval attraction that—combined with the aesthetic and geographical wonders of a travelogue, the eldritch presence of creatures and beings sown from human myth and fertilized by the author's potent demiurgical imagination, and the thrilling suspense of a chase/race to potentially the most apocalyptic of ends—finds a way to reach that part of the mind where such fantastic delights serve as satiating fare, and in which this popular escapism can be engirt with a morality now out of fashion but held necessary to burnish the imaginary with the gloss of both the good and the real—not to mention the fun.

⤷ The Fellowship of the Ring
⤷ The Two Towers
⤷ The Return of the King

"Akşam yıldızının solmasından sonra artık bu kitapta eski günler hakkında bir şey söylenmez"
Olağanüstü bir yapıt. Sadece anlattıkları, olaylar silsilesi değil koca bir evren yaratmak, dil yaratmak inanılmaz birşey. Daha başka ne söylenir ki.
Kitabın fiziksel ağırlığı nedeniyle okumam uzuunn bir zaman aldı ama bitince bambaşka bir alemden dünyaya geri dönmüş hissi verdi. Artık o evrende olmamak da üzdü. O yüzden dedim ki; iyi çok uzun bir süre ortadünyada yaşamışım :)

These books engendered my love of fantasy and it is easy to say that my life would be very different without that. It is the archetypal high fantasy. The Hero's Journey in almost pure form. In the modern era the style of writing may seem archaic but there is so much detail in it. A complex and interesting world built upon a history and mythology that feels as strong (or stronger in some cases) than real world counterparts.

A review of a book like this at this point is somewhat purposeless but I just want to add that it is perfectly understandable for generations already exposed to this book's descendants that are written more to the tone and vibe of their generation to respect this book, or maybe not even respect it, and not love it as Tolkien has fairly singular obsessions that may not be their thing. We do very much live in a generation, be it in books or music, or just attention spans, of taking all that other stuff out and just leave the cool shit. I'm here for that. I'm here for the input of all succeeding generations.

I'm also here for this book though and while the book stands up to me, even if it didn't, there are a handful of books, maybe less than a half dozen in each genre that you (or at least I) give a 5 stars because of how foundational they are both to the actual art being produced and what it did to carve out a market. All that 70s/80 epic fantasy, some of which were great, are almost completely indebted to Tolkien and their success was the blueprint that signaled to publishers, oh this is a thing we can put money in.

It's also almost the ultimate mixture for a very young kid obsessed with reading above their level and checks the boxes of classic and that fantasy we all love at once. I remember being in middle school and it was this series and Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum that obsessed me.

Aside, an odd story related to LotR, it actually revealed how bafflingly dumb some adults could be at an age where you still trusted adults and acknowledged their wisdom and experience and didn't think they were all like vile people on Facebook all day lol. I was walking home from the library having checked this book out again (because that's how we do) and I stopped by my best friend's house who lived across the street from me just to see if he was and wanted to play some ball (we lived at the mouth of a park with courts and the it was one of our town's prime spots for pick up games). His mother answered the door, saw the book, and said she'd go get my friend but I couldn't come in with that book because "it was a portal of evil". I don't know I used such language at the time but it may have been the first time I thought "you're the dumbest mofo I ever met" even before I knew the word. It's like it got downloaded into my brain from the experience points I just got from this encounter.

I remember the day vividly in the only way I could at the time, being somewhat of an already arrogant kid, and thinking damn if there are adults who become like this in the world I'm going to be hugely successful in whatever I choose to do if this is what I'm competing with. Thanks Tolkien.

The movies are great too. Incredible accomplishment. Almost impossible to believe. But the books are where I get my Glorfindel.

Frodo saattaa olla Sormuksen kantaja, mutta minulle Aragorn on koko tarinan sydän ja Samvais Gamgi sielu.

En voi sanoa mitään.



Kaikki tähdet maailmassa.