...
Show More
I was so irritated with certain of the author's premises that I found myself arguing as much as reading. But then it is good to read things that you don't agree with - it offers the opportunity to learn something new. I learned a different way of looking at the "Older Cultures" - that is the tribal cultures. I learned a very interesting method of sustainable farming used in the Amazon by (I think) the Kayapo tribe. I really give the author credit for realizing that no specific measures can save the planet from the fix we've put it in - it will take a change of mindset. That is something that I do agree with wholeheartedly - and for that reason I feel the book is generally worth reading (3 stars). However, the book cannot possibly succeed in its aim of encouraging a different mindset, because it is written in a way to put off anyone who does not already pretty much already agree with him. He repeatedly denigrates the beliefs of many serious religious folk and even of most thinking modern secular folks. He wants to unite, but he takes the soap box for one political party - how does he think he is going to sell "cooperation" to members of the other party? The premise with which I took such exception is that "city-states" (that is all material progress - all civilization as we know it) is like a cancer .... not the excessive materialism, but all of it - the progress and the immoderation all together. He cannot find one kind word to say about material progress from Gilgamesh in Sumeria, through Egypt, China, Greece, Rome, Incas, etc. Well, friends, I read this book while I was marooned. There's nothing like sitting for 2 hours pounding corn in a hollowed out log with the end of a piece of rebar so you can feed your chickens to make you think 6 minutes of electricity and your little food mill is a gift of the intellect - that ancient wisdom, sustainability AND modest modern convenience would make the best of all worlds.