...
Show More
A substitute for another book: after the first two chapters – a Kindle sample – of The Fatal Shore, I was engrossed and wanted to read more, regardless of the odd reservation. But I'd have had to pay for it, and I'm curtailing my book-buying habits after years of overindulgence. Bill Brysons, as any Brit knows, are freely and easily available anywhere: libraries, other people's bookshelves, park benches, lost property offices in the middle of nowhere… So it was with this I continued reading about Australia instead. This was first time I'd read more than a few pages of Bryson at a time, and whilst, yes, Down Under could have lost at least 50 pages without being any the worse, and some of the jokes are pretty bad, plenty aren't. There's something reliably amusing and companionable and consumable-in-bulk about his writing, can quite understand how he's the sort of thing people like to read when they have a cold. Diverting, yet not so amazing you'd worry about missing something. Also, damn clever to have an ice-cream cover design on this edition: the book becomes instantly moreish. The snobbery about Bryson must be a result of his bestselling over-exposure – it's easy to feel bored of him when you've barely read him. Although I started reading the Books pages of the papers so young that he still seems slightly new fangled, in the way of all things for which you can remember a Time Before. Maybe it was my year to get round to reading him – found a copy of At Home lying around a while ago, but passed on it because it's not exactly short.
The ordinariness of Bryson's approach is refreshing after a couple of other popular travelogues I've read in the last six weeks – The Year of Living Danishly and Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible – which concentrated on people the authors got to know via meedja connections, many of them well-off. Okay, Bryson's first Aussie journey is an expenses-paid first class junket for the Mail but after that he stumbles between ordinary hotels, ordinary hire cars, and shambolic yet ultimately rewarding long walks I found entirely relatable: all of this so that I could see a house I had no actual interest in seeing and then walk on to a place that I was now too tired to explore. But I hardly minded at all. And do you know why? I had seen a monotreme. Life could throw nothing at me that would diminish the thrill of that. (His descriptions of animals aren't always the most enthralling, but this echidna... a small furry hemisphere, rather like the brush portion of a floor polisher. Bless.)
As hundreds of thousands have no doubt said before, it's the mixture of typically British cynicism with American enthusiasm that make his appeal. (Meanwhile, the self-deprecation doesn't isn't so much the popular tic of a secretly confident British comedian, more honest self-awareness.) A skim of reviews of other Bryson titles on GR shows snobbery and peevishness to be readers' least-likes about him – but here, he simply really, really likes Australia, so unless you want to pick out a small handful of sideswipes at tacky locales, it's frankly difficult to find those here. For goodness sakes, about an area where he says all the anecdotes make locals look like pricks, he also says, In a word, Queensland has a reputation for being a place apart. I couldn’t wait to get there. Now that's open mindedness and enthusiasm.
His content is less elite-focused than the Danish and Russian books I mentioned: not just in his activities, but in the amount of time he spends around ordinary people, and because he has something, albeit not masses, to say about problems like poverty and racism (albeit as they were 15+ years ago). When I was younger, my impression of Australia, as for most British people my age, was from TV soaps (to me, it looked bland; to some it was a place they wanted to, and did, emigrate to) – but part of the more negative view I've picked up in recent years online is that it's a more racist, discriminatory and closed-minded society than Britain. I don't know quite how thick Bryson lays it on in implying that – at time of writing 15+ years ago - he couldn't find any white Australian with a good or insightful word to say about Aboriginal people, apart from a law centre solicitor who represents them - lovely guy, probably the nicest person in the book. He also explains the intergenerational dislocation of children being taken from their families through much of the twentieth century, and how this as well as the older history relates to current levels of violence, alcoholism and poverty. And I hope things are a bit better than this now, from Alice Springs: ‘But if you’re not giving the kids the lessons because the parents can’t help them, then those kids, when they become parents, won’t have the core skills either, will they?’ Unfortunately Bryson doesn't interview any Aboriginal people himself, and as he didn't notice any in public life despite looking, he gives the impression they're uniformly impoverished - but at least he's thinking about more than just other white middle class professionals on his journey, and his insights were sharper than might be expected from this new interview (sounds like he didn't see what those British regions were like between then and now, in particular how public services improved and then declined: the surfaces remain whilst the substance often has not. Saying everywhere looks richer now is too much attention to surface not story: like when you see a Greek person voxpopped on the news wearing some designer t-shirt...which they actually got several years ago, not yesterday, and it's not like anyone's going to pay them decent money if they sell it.)
Bryson hasn't entirely changed the impression of Australia I had when growing up: there are a lot of Crocodile Dundee type rural blokes; stuck in suburbs he says I sought in vain for a corner of Australia not covered by bungalows - and the country doesn't sound culturally compelling as somewhere to stay longer than a tourist, although the museums are top-notch. But I'm a whole lot keener on the outdoors, rural areas and places of low population density than I was as a teenager, and he has plenty to say about those, so the appeal becomes obvious there.
But when I say low population density, I meant I like the idea of the other houses being a few miles away – not a few hundred, which is a pretty typical distance between settlements in the Outback other than petrol stations and motels. I bet Tesco (or equivalent) doesn't deliver to those.
He makes the interesting discovery that Brisbane is not three or four hours north of Sydney, as I had long and casually supposed, but the better part of a couple of days’ drive. (I'd have assumed similar – and it's as daft as thinking Inverness is near London.) The lack of roads between big cities outside the south eastern coasts is bewildering to an American or Brit: Not an inch of paved road exists along the nearly 2,000 miles of indented coastline from Darwin to Cairns. Although at the time of writing 86% of Australians lived in cities, the proportions of Bryson's book try to get closer to the physical proportions of the place, with several long overland journeys through the baking outback – where he regales readers with the extreme privations of ill-prepared early white explorers who frequently perished, or who resorted to the likes of eating a whole raw wallaby, bones and fur included, in order to survive.
The Australian government's internet censorship policies, which for a time sounded the most draconian in the West, always seemed bizarrely out of kilter with the ruggedly outspoken the country otherwise had - and not just in fictional films. Bryson talks about the amusingly robust tenor of debate in the national parliament, and in particular from former PM Paul Keating: Among the epithets that have taken flight from his tongue during the course of public debate, and are to be found gracing the pages of whatever is the Australian equivalent of Hansard, have been scumbags, pieces of criminal garbage, sleazebags, stupid foul-mouthed grubs, piss-ants, mangy maggots, perfumed gigolos, gutless spivs, boxheads, immoral cheats, and stunned mullets.
But it turns out censorship of controversial material from the rest of the world has quite a history:
In the 1950s, Australia was probably the least confident nation in the English-speaking world. It was so far from everywhere that the authorities didn’t seem to know quite what was acceptable, so essentially they played it safe and allowed nothing....It wasn’t just suntan lotion ads that were censored, but movies, plays, magazines and books in numbers unbelievable. One thing you won’t find much in Australian second-hand bookshops are 1950s or earlier editions of lots of books – The Catcher in the Rye, A Farewell to Arms, Animal Farm, Peyton Place, Another Country, Brave New World and hundreds and hundreds of others. The reason for this is simple: they were banned. Altogether, at its peak, 5,000 titles were forbidden to be imported into the country.
On the subject of cultural exports rather than imports, I was delighted to have given up watching Neighbours & Home & Away in the mid-90s - a whole extra hour of life, 5 days a week! And had long since given up on the idea that there might be anything interesting to say about those shows. But perhaps someone was having a laugh after all in naming one of Erinsborough's main employers: Harold Bell Lasseter, in the 1920s claimed to have stumbled on a gold reef some ten miles long in the outback. Lasseter managed to persuade several sceptical businessmen and even some large corporations (General Motors, for one) to underwrite an expedition, which set off from Alice Springs in 1930... never found the gold. People are searching for it yet.
There's a lot in Down Under about dangerous animals – crocs, snakes, spiders (I understand from The Guardian that some Aussies find this a tired cliché among foreigners). The guy can't seem to walk a mile without walking into a cobweb. Which is fine when it's English webs made by those wispy beasts that are more like live dustbunnies than actual arachnids, but I'd rather not look at pics of Australian spiders, never mind get a real one on my clothes. He's continually alarmed by the idea of proximate danger (saying at least twice that no-one knows why the fauna, and occasional flora, is 'so extravagantly toxic') and bemused by the locals' attitude to it, living and working around it – it struck me that it's similar to significant allergies: there are these things in the environment that are dangerous and you have to live knowing that, it's just that he wasn't used to the idea at all.
The obscureness of Australia, another of the author's hobbyhorses throughout this book, hasn't entirely stood the test of time and the internet: it is nearly impossible to track Australian politics from abroad because so little news of the country's affairs leaks out to the wider world. Some American GR reviewers of this book still refer to Australia as a place people don't know much about, but it's not so for today's Guardian reader, who, several times a week, clicks stories assumed from their non-specific headlines to be UK news and finds they're about Oz. And as a Guardian reader, not wanting to be dismissive of other places - except perhaps the USA - reads them and acquires an accidental education.
Tracked down an old comment of mine, from January this year, when in response to someone else noticing they were overlooking Aus & NZ books, I said “I'm quite happy with my bias against Australian books (... though aboriginal authors interest me a little)." I've realised in the last few years that it's better for my head if I speak as I feel at the time rather than constantly second-guessing and caveatting myself like I used to, not feeling able to truly think or feel other than provisionally. But whilst it's really too early to say, that comment may be one of those occasions like when, in 2012, I said to a friend that I doubted I'd ever read a book over 400 pages again. It's by no means been a 180 degree turn, but over the past 3 years that was (past tense as am writing at a point when it looks as if difficult reading might get more … difficult again) perhaps a 45 degree one. Possibly it's time for one of those Tim Wintons that always used to look so boring on blogs.
The ordinariness of Bryson's approach is refreshing after a couple of other popular travelogues I've read in the last six weeks – The Year of Living Danishly and Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible – which concentrated on people the authors got to know via meedja connections, many of them well-off. Okay, Bryson's first Aussie journey is an expenses-paid first class junket for the Mail but after that he stumbles between ordinary hotels, ordinary hire cars, and shambolic yet ultimately rewarding long walks I found entirely relatable: all of this so that I could see a house I had no actual interest in seeing and then walk on to a place that I was now too tired to explore. But I hardly minded at all. And do you know why? I had seen a monotreme. Life could throw nothing at me that would diminish the thrill of that. (His descriptions of animals aren't always the most enthralling, but this echidna... a small furry hemisphere, rather like the brush portion of a floor polisher. Bless.)
As hundreds of thousands have no doubt said before, it's the mixture of typically British cynicism with American enthusiasm that make his appeal. (Meanwhile, the self-deprecation doesn't isn't so much the popular tic of a secretly confident British comedian, more honest self-awareness.) A skim of reviews of other Bryson titles on GR shows snobbery and peevishness to be readers' least-likes about him – but here, he simply really, really likes Australia, so unless you want to pick out a small handful of sideswipes at tacky locales, it's frankly difficult to find those here. For goodness sakes, about an area where he says all the anecdotes make locals look like pricks, he also says, In a word, Queensland has a reputation for being a place apart. I couldn’t wait to get there. Now that's open mindedness and enthusiasm.
His content is less elite-focused than the Danish and Russian books I mentioned: not just in his activities, but in the amount of time he spends around ordinary people, and because he has something, albeit not masses, to say about problems like poverty and racism (albeit as they were 15+ years ago). When I was younger, my impression of Australia, as for most British people my age, was from TV soaps (to me, it looked bland; to some it was a place they wanted to, and did, emigrate to) – but part of the more negative view I've picked up in recent years online is that it's a more racist, discriminatory and closed-minded society than Britain. I don't know quite how thick Bryson lays it on in implying that – at time of writing 15+ years ago - he couldn't find any white Australian with a good or insightful word to say about Aboriginal people, apart from a law centre solicitor who represents them - lovely guy, probably the nicest person in the book. He also explains the intergenerational dislocation of children being taken from their families through much of the twentieth century, and how this as well as the older history relates to current levels of violence, alcoholism and poverty. And I hope things are a bit better than this now, from Alice Springs: ‘But if you’re not giving the kids the lessons because the parents can’t help them, then those kids, when they become parents, won’t have the core skills either, will they?’ Unfortunately Bryson doesn't interview any Aboriginal people himself, and as he didn't notice any in public life despite looking, he gives the impression they're uniformly impoverished - but at least he's thinking about more than just other white middle class professionals on his journey, and his insights were sharper than might be expected from this new interview (sounds like he didn't see what those British regions were like between then and now, in particular how public services improved and then declined: the surfaces remain whilst the substance often has not. Saying everywhere looks richer now is too much attention to surface not story: like when you see a Greek person voxpopped on the news wearing some designer t-shirt...which they actually got several years ago, not yesterday, and it's not like anyone's going to pay them decent money if they sell it.)
Bryson hasn't entirely changed the impression of Australia I had when growing up: there are a lot of Crocodile Dundee type rural blokes; stuck in suburbs he says I sought in vain for a corner of Australia not covered by bungalows - and the country doesn't sound culturally compelling as somewhere to stay longer than a tourist, although the museums are top-notch. But I'm a whole lot keener on the outdoors, rural areas and places of low population density than I was as a teenager, and he has plenty to say about those, so the appeal becomes obvious there.
But when I say low population density, I meant I like the idea of the other houses being a few miles away – not a few hundred, which is a pretty typical distance between settlements in the Outback other than petrol stations and motels. I bet Tesco (or equivalent) doesn't deliver to those.
He makes the interesting discovery that Brisbane is not three or four hours north of Sydney, as I had long and casually supposed, but the better part of a couple of days’ drive. (I'd have assumed similar – and it's as daft as thinking Inverness is near London.) The lack of roads between big cities outside the south eastern coasts is bewildering to an American or Brit: Not an inch of paved road exists along the nearly 2,000 miles of indented coastline from Darwin to Cairns. Although at the time of writing 86% of Australians lived in cities, the proportions of Bryson's book try to get closer to the physical proportions of the place, with several long overland journeys through the baking outback – where he regales readers with the extreme privations of ill-prepared early white explorers who frequently perished, or who resorted to the likes of eating a whole raw wallaby, bones and fur included, in order to survive.
The Australian government's internet censorship policies, which for a time sounded the most draconian in the West, always seemed bizarrely out of kilter with the ruggedly outspoken the country otherwise had - and not just in fictional films. Bryson talks about the amusingly robust tenor of debate in the national parliament, and in particular from former PM Paul Keating: Among the epithets that have taken flight from his tongue during the course of public debate, and are to be found gracing the pages of whatever is the Australian equivalent of Hansard, have been scumbags, pieces of criminal garbage, sleazebags, stupid foul-mouthed grubs, piss-ants, mangy maggots, perfumed gigolos, gutless spivs, boxheads, immoral cheats, and stunned mullets.
But it turns out censorship of controversial material from the rest of the world has quite a history:
In the 1950s, Australia was probably the least confident nation in the English-speaking world. It was so far from everywhere that the authorities didn’t seem to know quite what was acceptable, so essentially they played it safe and allowed nothing....It wasn’t just suntan lotion ads that were censored, but movies, plays, magazines and books in numbers unbelievable. One thing you won’t find much in Australian second-hand bookshops are 1950s or earlier editions of lots of books – The Catcher in the Rye, A Farewell to Arms, Animal Farm, Peyton Place, Another Country, Brave New World and hundreds and hundreds of others. The reason for this is simple: they were banned. Altogether, at its peak, 5,000 titles were forbidden to be imported into the country.
On the subject of cultural exports rather than imports, I was delighted to have given up watching Neighbours & Home & Away in the mid-90s - a whole extra hour of life, 5 days a week! And had long since given up on the idea that there might be anything interesting to say about those shows. But perhaps someone was having a laugh after all in naming one of Erinsborough's main employers: Harold Bell Lasseter, in the 1920s claimed to have stumbled on a gold reef some ten miles long in the outback. Lasseter managed to persuade several sceptical businessmen and even some large corporations (General Motors, for one) to underwrite an expedition, which set off from Alice Springs in 1930... never found the gold. People are searching for it yet.
There's a lot in Down Under about dangerous animals – crocs, snakes, spiders (I understand from The Guardian that some Aussies find this a tired cliché among foreigners). The guy can't seem to walk a mile without walking into a cobweb. Which is fine when it's English webs made by those wispy beasts that are more like live dustbunnies than actual arachnids, but I'd rather not look at pics of Australian spiders, never mind get a real one on my clothes. He's continually alarmed by the idea of proximate danger (saying at least twice that no-one knows why the fauna, and occasional flora, is 'so extravagantly toxic') and bemused by the locals' attitude to it, living and working around it – it struck me that it's similar to significant allergies: there are these things in the environment that are dangerous and you have to live knowing that, it's just that he wasn't used to the idea at all.
The obscureness of Australia, another of the author's hobbyhorses throughout this book, hasn't entirely stood the test of time and the internet: it is nearly impossible to track Australian politics from abroad because so little news of the country's affairs leaks out to the wider world. Some American GR reviewers of this book still refer to Australia as a place people don't know much about, but it's not so for today's Guardian reader, who, several times a week, clicks stories assumed from their non-specific headlines to be UK news and finds they're about Oz. And as a Guardian reader, not wanting to be dismissive of other places - except perhaps the USA - reads them and acquires an accidental education.
Tracked down an old comment of mine, from January this year, when in response to someone else noticing they were overlooking Aus & NZ books, I said “I'm quite happy with my bias against Australian books (... though aboriginal authors interest me a little)." I've realised in the last few years that it's better for my head if I speak as I feel at the time rather than constantly second-guessing and caveatting myself like I used to, not feeling able to truly think or feel other than provisionally. But whilst it's really too early to say, that comment may be one of those occasions like when, in 2012, I said to a friend that I doubted I'd ever read a book over 400 pages again. It's by no means been a 180 degree turn, but over the past 3 years that was (past tense as am writing at a point when it looks as if difficult reading might get more … difficult again) perhaps a 45 degree one. Possibly it's time for one of those Tim Wintons that always used to look so boring on blogs.