...
Show More
Chatty and readable with a few intriguing opinions. But there is no original research and at least one very careless factual error about Charlotte Bronte’s cause of death.
He veered between overflowing vitality and prostration in a manner that seems to the modern sensibility almost hysterical. Every stimulus produced an enormous reaction, to the point that right around this period in Dickens's life, it was rumored that he was mad. Certainly, he was frenzied, and certain, in the grips of inspiration, he had only tenuous control over his facial expressions and his tongue. His daughter Kate as an adult recalled watching Dickens at work; the characters and their voices seemed to possess him--he spoke their lines and acted out their parts as he wrong them down, often looking into a mirror. (23-24)
Other thinkers, not novelists, had other ideas about the significance of individuals and individualism, but Dickens's chosen form saddled him with a philosophical question he tried ardently to solve, both srtisticallya nd personally, for hsi entire life. The controversies that arise about Dickens's real political views, in my opinion, arise primarily from the fact that a novelist always, and increasingly, sees teh trees rather than the forest, and is naturally unsympathetic to a collective solution, while always more or less in favor of a connective solution. (60)