Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
35(35%)
4 stars
29(29%)
3 stars
35(35%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
The original edition of Little Women had two parts, the second part later came to be published separately and given the title Good Wives. The version I have read and am reviewing includes the second part and thus also Good Wives. Good Wives commences with chapter 24 and concludes with chapter 47, the final chapter of the book.

I definitely prefer Little Women over Good Wives. Since I am rating the entire book including both parts, I can only give it three stars, which means nevertheless that I do like it.

I like the simplicity of Louisa May Alcott´s prose. She states, “I like good strong words that mean something…” Her own words sum up succinctly how she writes. Secondly, the thoughts and sentiments expressed are wise and have a resonance that all will recognize. Such declarations of truths and morals are valuable and didactic but become preachy when used to excess. Unfortunately, this is what happens all too often here. Morals illustrated through behavior of the characters are more effective than those that are delivered through speech. Both methods are used in the novel. Put together, the sum total becomes too much. The dicta delivered become repetitive.

The novel is loosely biographical. Jo March, the second oldest of the four March sisters, mirrors the author. It is interesting to note that when Jo tries to get her stories published, they are criticized for being morality lessons, and thus in the novel, the author tackles head on this criticism. Writing sensational stories was not to her taste, but middle roads can be taken; one needs not choose only between two extremes.

Little Women focuses upon the four March children when they are young. Their father, a scholar and a minister, is serving as a chaplain with the Union Army. The story is set primarily in Boston during and immediately after the Civil War. The family has lost its former wealth when their father helped a family in debt. The story begins when the four sisters are respectively sixteen, fifteen, thirteen and twelve year of age. In Good Wives they have become young women—twenty, nineteen, seventeen and sixteen. In the former we observe a close-knit family led by a caring, loving and wise mother. There is no denying that the strong sense of family is refreshing. The girls are not saints, but this simply makes them human and characters one can easily relate to. The mother, on the other hand, has not a single fault. In my view, she need not have been drawn as a paragon. In Good Wives the focus shifts from young girls learning good behavior from their mother to young women taking wing, leaving home and ultimately finding a husband. The girls’ choice of husbands never rang true to me. I could reason with my head that each one’s respective choice could make sense, but I never felt the strength of budding love in the couples’ relationships. In Good Wives there are scenes abroad. The foreign settings are not well captured.

The four sisters’ respective personalities are extremely well drawn. All four of them come alive. They are not drawn in black and white.

While the book is primarily about these four sisters, their mother and later their husbands, there is also a very wealthy neighbor that lives next door. This is Mr. Laurence and his grandson, Laurie Lawrence. Laurie is sixteen at the start of the novel. The two Laurences run as a steady thread through the entire novel. Without them, the whole novel would fall flat. These two figures I liked a lot! Their role is however more captivating in little Women than in Good Wives.

There is humor written into the lines. There is a parrot that says the funniest things, but this is just one example of many. The humor is not blatant; you must think.

Barbara Caruso narrates the audiobook. I have given her performance a four star rating. The reading is clear, easy to follow and not over-dramatized. I liked it a lot.

**********************

Hospital Sketches 3 stars
Little Women 3 stars
April 25,2025
... Show More
The two books that I have read the most in my life: Little Women and Walden.

Louisa May Alcott wrote Little Women in 1868. It centers on the 4 young March sisters: Meg, Jo, Amy, and Beth. Each of the sisters has a distinct personality. Meg is the oldest, Jo is the writer and tomboy, Amy is the vain one, and Beth is a saint. The sisters are guided by their mother, Marmee, and they strike up a friendship with the next-door-neighbor boy, Laurie.

Little Women follows the March sisters as they grow up. Each chapter is relatively short and usually features a moral lesson without being preachy (much like parables in the Bible).

Transcendentalism

Now, I mentioned Walden. What in the world does that have to do with Little Women? Why I am so glad you asked (or if you didn’t I will tell you anyways).

Walden is authored by a man named Henry David Thoreau. He also lived in Concord, Massachusetts, the same as Louisa May Alcott. Additionally, Thoreau and Louisa May Alcott were friends. They were both transcendentalists. Transcendentalism is centered around the philosophy of simple, plain living with high thinking.

When was the last time you received an advertisement that said, “Buy less!” or “Stop buying things. You are enough!”? If you are like me, that has never happened. Yet every day, we are inundated to buy more concealer, a new pair of skinny jeans, a lavish vacation, or a gigantic mansion that will surely make us happy. Transcendentalism is anti-consumerism. It is a reminder that there is another way to live.

Little Women is the more digestible version of Walden, but if you loved Little Women and enjoyed the morals therein, I highly, highly, highly suggest Walden (alright I suggest Walden to practically anybody).

Jane Austen

The last time I read Little Women was before the internet existed. When I picked this book up again for this reread, I am a completely different reader, and I have even more respect for Louisa May Alcott than before. One of the things that I simply hate about Jane Austen is that her characters just seem to sit around and do nothing but complain about men and their highest desire is to be married (the female characters also do a bunch of silly things).

Louisa May Alcott is the opposite of Jane Austen, and I like her more for it. Her female characters are strong. At the beginning of the novel, both Meg and Jo are working jobs to support their family. Jo dreams more of being a writer than getting married. Marmee is more focused on raising wonderful people versus marrying off her daughters.

One of the characters in Little Women refuses a marriage proposal. When she says no, she says that she really means no. In Jane Austen’s novels, her heroine receives multiple marriage proposals, and she says no and then yes. This is very confusing to young readers. Are you supposed to say no when you really mean yes? I think Louisa May Alcott has the better idea of just saying no when you mean no. As an introvert if I get even an inkling that the other person isn’t interested, I will never try again so if you mean yes, you should probably say yes and leave mind games to Jane Austen novels.

Overall, Little Women is a timeless classic, one that should be read over and over again.

2025 Reading Schedule
JantA Town Like Alice
FebtBirdsong
MartCaptain Corelli's Mandolin - Louis De Berniere
AprtWar and Peace
MaytThe Woman in White
JuntAtonement
JultThe Shadow of the Wind
AugtJude the Obscure
SeptUlysses
OcttVanity Fair
NovtA Fine Balance
DectGerminal

Connect With Me!
Blog Twitter BookTube Insta My Bookstore at Pango
April 25,2025
... Show More
3.5⭐️

I read this with feelings of warmth and love for the first 60% of the book and the writing was nothing short of gorgeous and riveting. I thought it was going to be a solid 5 star for me but I fear the characters just started to make life difficult for themselves for no goddamn reason imo.

I understand that there were a lot of questions with regards to whether or not Laurie and Jo were compatible romantically, Beth's health, Jo's writing, ... but emotions, decisions and actions started to run rampant and characters felt feeble and made the story fell all over the place for me.

I'm trying to also be understanding about how the 60% mark felt like a third act breakup n  for no reasonn between the story and its readers, because life especially for women in families, friendships and love was so much different in 1860s. Coming from reading too many modern reads, my brain may unconsciously be struggling to reconcile that.

It's still a strong read and enjoyable experience. I would recommend, reads like a true classic. I kmow if I read it in the year it published, I would be completely blown away. ❤️

***

ready for my first read of the year
April 25,2025
... Show More
Someone I know claimed this no longer has value, that she would never recommend it because it's saccharine, has a religious agenda, and sends a bad message to girls that they should all be little domestic homebodies. I say she's wrong on all counts. This is high on my reread list along with Pride and Prejudice, Jane Eyre, and a Tree Grows in Brooklyn--you could say that I'm pretty familiar with it.

Let's see--there's a heroine who not only writes, but is proud of the fact and makes a profit from it in a time that this was somewhat out-of-the-ordinary. Reading this, and especially knowing later that the main character is (for all practical purposes) Alcott herself, inspired me to write myself, and I haven't forgotten the writing lessons even today: don't let money cloud your vision, write for yourself first, take criticism, write what you know. Still wise even today. Also in this book, we see the perspective of a family coping with the financial and emotional strain of having a loved one away at war, something that is unfortunately all too relatable today. There's also (extraordinary in those times, common in ours)a platonic, though not uncomplicated, friendship between a man and a woman that is sort of a different kind of love story in a way and a powerful one at that. We see people getting married, but marriage is never portrayed as The Answer to Everything--many of the matches involve sacrifice and struggling. The girls, though good at heart, aren't a picture-perfect family of saints. They're flawed and human. The paragon Beth would seem the exception, but the message with her is more about how even the quietest among us can make an impact on the world--not parading her isolated life as an example, only her kindness.

I won't lie. Someone dies, there's a war and a father's away--so yes, God is mentioned: I think there's a few Pilgrim's Progress references in passing and there's some talk of faith at moments when the characters most need it. To contemporary readers, this may seem like a lot, but heavy-handed it is not. It was probably somewhat unusual for its time. The thought that everyone's relationship and perception of God could greatly vary, and that to be true to your religion was entirely non judgmental and meant being kind to other people and trying to make yourself better, not other people? The thought that each person must be allowed to deal with these feelings in their own time in their own way? Wacky stuff.

I admit it seems like a tough sell to today's kids, packaged in somewhat formal sounding-language, and bearing every indication of being literary broccoli, but this book is a classic for a reason. It might be a tough sell, but I don't think we should give up on trying to think of ways to do it anyway. What's inside still counts. Don't write it off.

*note* for those of you who liked this review, check out my review of the new The Little Women Cookbook by Jenne Bergstrom and Miko Osada.
April 25,2025
... Show More
I’M IN LOVE, I’M IN LOVE, AND I DON’T CARE WHO KNOWS IT!

When I was a child, my mother used to drag me to antique stores all the time. There is nothing more boring to a kid than an antique store. It smelled like dust and old people, and everything looked the same (dark wood), and if we were in a particularly bauble-heavy shop I had to clasp my hands behind my back like a Von Trapp child in order to avoid invoking the you-break-it-you-buy-it policy on a $42 crystal ashtray.

On one such excursion, when I was like eight, I found a vintage-ish copy of Little Women. Because it was a book, and because it had some kind of illustration of pretty girls in pretty dresses, it was far and away the most interesting thing in there. So I indulged in what was then and what remains one of my favorite pastimes: asking my mother to buy me something. She said no, both because it was confusingly expensive and because she doubted eight-year-old me’s lasting interest in reading a 750-page book from 1868.

Ever since, Little Women has tantalized me.

I am very pleased to say it lived up to every expectation.

This book is so cozy and delightful and happy. A lot of the time, when series start out in the childhood of characters and then follow their growing up, the book gets worse. But I always liked reading about this ragtag group of gals!!

Warning, spoiler ahead, and if you complain about me spoiling a book that was published seven of my lifetime ago I will absolutely freak out so don’t say I didn’t give you a heads up:

Obviously Jo and Laurie were meant for each other, and his marrying Amy and Jo’s marrying some random old dude was the biggest flaw of this book. But even with that, this book ended happy, and I enjoyed almost every second of it.

(Okay, I’m sorry, but Amy is the clear weak link and didn’t deserve Laurie!! I will not rejoice for them!!) (Did I have to take off a half star for that alone? Yes. Because it upset me immensely. And I won’t apologize. If anyone should be apologized to, it’s ME. And also JO. And also LAURIE!)

But absolutely every other second was a pleasure.

Bottom line: This book feels like Christmas.

---------
pre-review

cozy: ✓
comforted: ✓
joy: ✓

review to come!!!

---------
currently-reading updates

I am ready to feel COZY. I am ready to feel COMFORTED. I am ready to feel JOY.
April 25,2025
... Show More
I wanted to love this novel so much and thus I set myself up for failure. I’ll try to adequately summarize my thoughts, however I feel a little scatterbrained. It’s taken me a long time to get through this novel and thus not everything is fresh in my mind. I won’t be tagging any spoilers so if you still haven’t read this, haven’t watched the movie or live under rock then I advise you to stay clear of my review.

2.5ish/5

n  Part Onen
If I had to rate the first part of this novel I would have given it no higher than one star. It’s so dreadful to read through multiple “moral lessons” from a woman that often time teaches her daughters to humble themselves for men. I understand that this is a classic and thus the values and morals have changed, however this is a novel that is still praised for the lessons it is teaching; these lessons are mostly boring and arise out of natural circumstances.

I don’t know about you but my upbringing did not result in a lecture after everything I did. I learned things on my own and it felt that the little women were often time coddled. It’s no wonder I severely despise the woman Meg and Jo had grown into.

Additionally, Mr. March might be the second worst character. Both the Marches are incredibly one dimensional. His only importance to the story was when he was away at war and once he returned he served no purpose.

Meg’s love story with Brooke makes my blood boil. Within five minutes Meg goes from declining his proposal to declaring her love for him to defy Aunt March. There exists no romance or chemistry between them and she’s still the same immature child she was five minutes ago. This concludes the first part and leads us to

n  Part Twon
I’m not a particular fan of the style of writing and some chapters read more easily than others. There are the select few chapters that were phenomenally written. I wish I could pluck these out bind them in their own novel and reread this instead. The chapters are: Literary Lessons, Heartache, Beth’s Secret, Lazy Laurence, and The Valley of the Shadow.

First and foremost, the Jo/Laurie/Amy debate shouldn’t exist in my opinion. Laurie proposed at the wrong time, had he waited until both him and Jo were older I think she would have said yes, regardless of whether he got his life together like Amy demanded him to. Both Laurie and Jo were still childish and despite her young age Amy was able to put Laurie in shape to be the respectable gentleman his grandfather wanted him to be.

What we should all be focusing on is Beth’s death. I don’t think it was avoidable and it plays a pivotal part in the story. It certainly made me sad but the strongest emotion this chapter evoked from me was anger.

Why would Beth doom Jo by making her promise to stay with their parents upon her death?

From page one Jo has been waiting for an opportunity to travel and gain experiences and instead Jo is forced to take Beth's place. Had Beth lived, I believe she would have married a simple man like Mr. March and continued taking care of her parents and family nearby. Because of her death, Beth needed someone to fill that place and thus came in Jo. This PISSED ME THE FUCK OFF. As soon as Jo makes that promise any life she had planned vanished and with that she met crusty ass fucking Professor Bhaer and crossed herself off my list of characters I love.

I don’t think I will ever hate a character as much as Bhaer This man is so condescending and self centered. He’s as one dimensional as Mr. March (we’re going full circle here). HE LITERALLY READ A POEM ABOUT THE LITTLE WOMEN, let me repeat that, THE LITTLE WOMEN, and pulled out a sentence about love and said “diz here iz about me professorine” LIKE SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!

Which brings me to the fucking end. Of course Amy is doomed with a sick child because she named her kid after Beth. Jo I couldn’t give a fuck about after she gave a second thought to a crusty old man. Meg I hated from the first page. Doesn’t even matter if they mention Beth because Jo took her place.

The more I think about this novel, the more I think about how much I hate it and how it doesn’t make up for the 5 chapters I enjoyed out of 47. Had I read this novel as a child and grown up with it, maybe I would have liked it (very weak maybe), but I think a piece of literature should be judged despite what age you read it at and this just didn’t do it for me.

Thank god for Greta Gerwig and being able to make a phenomenal movie out of such a mediocre novel.

---
Yes I just watched the 2019 film adaptation for the first time and I am emotional.

No, I will not be taking questions at this time. Thank you.
April 25,2025
... Show More
DNF
This is a truly great book, but sadly I just cannot concentrate on it, maybe later I try to pick it up…
April 25,2025
... Show More
Crisp, gloomy days and this book: best combo ever.

That being said, I didn’t give it five stars, though I was adamant to add it to my favorite's shelf after reading the opening chapter. And it can be for the fact that I watched its movie beforehand and so the urge to know what happens next was nowhere to be found.

This book is all about sisterhood and their journey from being little girls to poise ladies. Each sister has unique traits and life tests them all with love and sorrow. But no matter what happens, their mother is always there for them to act as the guiding light in the dark path.

Reading this book made me long for sisters — I only have a younger brother — so that I can have quarrels and gossip sessions with them all day long. Though growing up, my brother was forced to give me company while I played with Barbies and Dollhouses. And sometimes I made him wear make-up and hairbands, too, when I got bored. Ah, those precious childhood memories ❤
April 25,2025
... Show More
i've never witnessed a ship of mine get sunk so tragically, how dare you ms. alcott (ง •̀_•́)ง

RTC

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

probably the first classic that i'm //choosing// to read so let's hope this goes well bc it'll probs determine whether i keep this charade up or not :))

n  Buddy readn with ma girl, t swizzle
April 25,2025
... Show More
n  n    “I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.”n  n

So far, I only knew these Little Women from the film adaptations that were inspired by Louisa May Alcott's novel – the 1933 version with Katharine Hepburn and Joan Bennett, the 1994 version with Susan Sarandon, Claire Danes and Winona Ryder, and of course the irresistibly compelling 2019 adaptation by Greta Gerwig with Saoirse Ronan, Emma Watson, Eliza Scanlen and Florence Pugh in the leading roles. Hence, I was already well aware of the nature of the story and the characters, but finally I decided that it was about time that I got to know the novel that spawned these memorable adaptations. And well, let's just say this was far from disappointing.

n  n   
“Don't try to make me grow up before my time…”
n  
n

In Little Women, author Louisa May Alcott immediately guides her readers into a delightful pool of exquisiteness. With a story that is accessible and meaningful to all ages, Alcott teachers generations upon generations of young readers the lessons that Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy themselves learnt during the course of the novel.

The (melo)dramatic, often sentimental familial dynamics are brightly interwoven with American history to construct an endearing, captivating portrait of the bildungsroman that teaches moral lessons and values by having its core characters grow from adolescence to adulthood and make their own decisions, sometimes precipitately, sometimes unwisely, almost always with new moralistic insight to be gained. Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy, as well as all the endearing secondary characters (of course, none of them more endearing than Laurie) become your close friends during the reading experience, rendering Little Women an all the more winning endeavor that effortlessly passes the test of time.

And finally, the novel is so beautifully written that if I hadn't listened to the audiobook, but acquired a used copy instead that went through dozens of hands before (which, to me, screams to be the most compelling way to read this novel), I am sure I would have highlighted a sentence on every page. There are many other authors whose works are just as quotable, of course, but in my sentimental rush right after finishing this novel, I want to say that no other author managed to inject one novel with so many quote-worthy phrases.

n  n    "Because they are mean is no reason why I should be. I hate such things, and though I think I've a right to be hurt, I don't intend to show it."n  n


If I had to criticize anything about the book, it would be that it seems a little bit too intent on spreading happiness and optimism. Granted, blows of fate and (minor) conflicts occur frequently, but they are mostly solved rather quickly, highlighting the sentimental approach Louisa May Alcott went for. That approach seems to obstruct depth, for most of the moral conclusions taught in Little Women are spelled out explicitly rather than allowing the reader to make their own deductions. However, Alcott apparently wrote the novel directed towards a target audience of young girls, obviously not yet knowing the timeless success that her writing would achieve, so I hesitate to criticize the author for not opting for a more subtle approach at times. Because ultimately, as a sentimental, nostalgic, heartwarming appeal for love and friendship, Little Women is effective on all levels, and sometimes that is all that counts.

n  n    “Be worthy love, and love will come.”n  n
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.