...
Show More
Having just read the Enchiridion of Epictetus, I figured one good Enchiridion deserved another. Or something like that.
It had been a good solid decade since I read Augustine, and honestly, it wasn't easy going. It was classical orthodoxy, the sort of thing I digested while taking systematics in seminary, and I found myself leafing forward through it as Augustine laid out statements so familiar that I didn't need to hear them again. For those uninitiated in the minutiae of Christian theology, it would be frustratingly opaque, bordering on unreadable.
Three things struck me, as I compared Augustine to Epictetus. First, the Stoic was far more accessible, relying almost entirely on human reason and experience for his argumentation. The Saint, on the other hand, used scripture almost exclusively. Second, the Stoic spoke of the things of life, whereas the Saint seemed almost entirely about the business of making intricate theological points.
Still and all, where the Saint concluded was the radical ethical demand for compassion, charity, and service...while the Stoic felt robust but peculiarly distanced from others. The abstract, yielding concrete connection, while the more concrete philosophy yielded an ethos abstracted from others.
It had been a good solid decade since I read Augustine, and honestly, it wasn't easy going. It was classical orthodoxy, the sort of thing I digested while taking systematics in seminary, and I found myself leafing forward through it as Augustine laid out statements so familiar that I didn't need to hear them again. For those uninitiated in the minutiae of Christian theology, it would be frustratingly opaque, bordering on unreadable.
Three things struck me, as I compared Augustine to Epictetus. First, the Stoic was far more accessible, relying almost entirely on human reason and experience for his argumentation. The Saint, on the other hand, used scripture almost exclusively. Second, the Stoic spoke of the things of life, whereas the Saint seemed almost entirely about the business of making intricate theological points.
Still and all, where the Saint concluded was the radical ethical demand for compassion, charity, and service...while the Stoic felt robust but peculiarly distanced from others. The abstract, yielding concrete connection, while the more concrete philosophy yielded an ethos abstracted from others.