...
Show More
There are a lot of long monologues, and characters with iffy motivations in this (though that's probably true for a lot of Greek myths). Medea and Helen were interesting to read, mainly because I didn't know that much about either story. I liked how you the introduction to ancient philosophy book I read before this gave me an insight into how different schools of philosophy would give varied insights into the character of Medea and how her actions could be interpreted. Not really a big fan of Hippolytus, and I hate Electra as a character, though the play was interesting enough.
I've now read Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, and for me Sophocles is the clear favorite. I adore Oedipus the King. Aeschylus was almost painful to get through, though I should probably give him another chance. Euripides was easy to read, but I never got properly invested.
I've now read Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, and for me Sophocles is the clear favorite. I adore Oedipus the King. Aeschylus was almost painful to get through, though I should probably give him another chance. Euripides was easy to read, but I never got properly invested.