I didn't understand much about this accounting connection for a long time. But there was typical training in it, an introduction to the world... Let's say that the bad guy who is still a cheat is still the main villain. I'm thinking a lot between three and four points; in the end, it will get four points, but only because of Feist...
Accounting can be a complex and often misunderstood field. In this particular case, I struggled to grasp the full implications of the connection for a significant period. However, within it, there were elements of typical training that helped to provide a basic understanding. The introduction to the world of accounting also shed some light on its various aspects. Despite this, there was still a sense that there were hidden agendas or perhaps some less savory characters at play. The idea of a cheat being the main villain added an element of mystery and intrigue. I found myself constantly deliberating between giving it a three or four-point rating. In the end, I decided on four points, but this was mainly due to the influence of Feist. His work or contribution must have had a significant impact on my decision-making process.