2/19/21 - I'm editing my review. It might seem strange to edit a review for a book I read over two years ago without rereading it. But I've noticed that whenever I talk about fantasy with my friends, I use this book as an example of perfect world building. It's one of those rare novels that become more perfect the more I think about it. I have no strong desire to revisit the first or third book, but this one may actually go on my favorites shelf.
If you read my review of the previous novel, A Wizard of Earthsea, you'll know I wasn't enamored with it. I didn't say it was bad; far from it. I respected that book for many of the things it did, but I didn't personally care much for it. I went ahead and read the second book because I felt like, to a certain extent, I must be missing something. I think it's no exaggeration to say that Earthsea is one of the most loved Fantasy series, having clearly inspired many works and endured strongly since the late 60s. What was it that captured imaginations but only gently tapped mine? Was it the younger reader aspect? Was this a series that one needed to read at a young age and then let nostalgia keep it fresh?
At times like this, I actually hate that our star rating is listed before the review. Anyone with a casual glance can say, “Yes Tim, enough with the dramatics, we can see the four (now FIVE) stars. Tell us why you liked this one better.” *Sigh* Star ratings just have no flare for the dramatic.
Yes, I liked this one better. A lot better. While I respected the first book, I couldn't say I found it enjoyable. This one, I can say both. This one is something of a masterpiece in my eyes. It corrects every issue I had with the last. Here, we get to know our characters more personally; we're let into their lives rather than kept at a distance. There's far more development than “I was an arrogant kid and then grew up” (yes, I know that's a slight exaggeration… but not much). Here, I actually really cared about what was going on.
The book is short, only 212 pages in my edition. This works both for and against it. On one hand, the story, if we really get down to it, could be summed up in a few sentences. In fact, from a plot assessment, not much goes on. If we only focus on plot, the book could have ended about 20 pages earlier from a traditional narrative perspective. I'll even confess that as I read the last two chapters, I had a metaphoric raised eyebrow wondering why we were getting an extended epilogue. Was this really needed?
Oh, my… yes, yes it was. The first book was a hero's journey. A lesson learned, darkness vanquished, let's go home triumphant. This one is almost entirely an internal struggle with a fantasy story happening around it. It's the story of someone who has lost everything, including her name, and seeing if she's willing to lose what little security she has for the mere possibility of something better. This is an emotional story, presented in a “young adult” friendly fashion, while letting those of us who are older see the darker side, the story told from the shadows and between the lines. The ending section, in my opinion, is what heightens the entire story and raises it to that minor masterpiece status.
Now, ignoring this, I would still say I liked this book better, even if it didn't have the emotional impact (though I'm very glad it did). Why? World building. The world of the previous novel was interesting, but with the second book, Le Guin cemented herself as one of the best in terms of world building. She expands on concepts mentioned in the previous book and plays with them in interesting ways. This one takes place on a different island, in a different country, and we see a completely different perspective. We see the world through other eyes with a vastly altered view from the previous book. The world is built up in so many interesting, small ways, like the rituals in the temple that are performed but never fully explained, as much of the reasons for them have been lost to time. I complained in my last review that the book seemed almost like a textbook, too distanced. Now, I almost feel like I would happily read a full history of the world presented here.
And that, my friends, is the highest compliment I can give a fantasy novel in terms of world building.
5/5 stars and my highest possible recommendation.
Kad se kod Le Gvinove "razmontira" maska koje njeno pisanje nosi, kad se obrišu nazivi zemalja, geografskih odrednica iz mašte, čarobnjaci, sveštenice, magija i zmajevi, jedna stvar ostaje jasna. Suština ostaje kao takva, istina u samoj biti čoveka, njegovoj interakciji sa prirodom i ljudima. Pri tom, priča nije teška i truckava, ni banalna sa druge strane. Balans i mera je ono što Ursulu razdvaja od mora drugih. Njen nepogrešiv osećaj za humanizam se vidi u svakoj rečenici.
Kazuo Išiguro je dobio nagradu Nobelove akademije za književnost. Da je Le Guin poživela, postojala je velika verovatnoća da bi ona ubrzo postala laureat. Njeno delo je značajno za svet književnosti, predstavlja različite teme i ideje koje mogu inspirisati i podstaknuti druge pisce. Njena sposobnost da kreira kompleksne karaktere i atraktivne priče je nešto što je veliko zaštitno sredstvo u modernoj književnosti.
Following the resounding success of my Locus Quest, I was faced with a dilemma. Which reading list should I follow it up with? Since variety is the spice of life, I've decided to diversify and pursue six different lists simultaneously. This book falls into my LOCUS FANTASY list. The Locus Sci-Fi Award winners list treated me so well, so I figure I'll trust those same good folk to pick me some stars in their sister-list, the Locus Fantasy Award winners.
Le Guin and I continue to have an okay relationship, without becoming friends. I respect what she does, but it just doesn't really excite me. When I look at the many 5-star reviews from Goodreads friends whose opinions I respect and normally agree with, I find myself in the apathetic minority with Earthsea. They're between "it was OK" and "like it", and I round that 2.5 up to 3 because I'm generous. This is the story of the Eaten One, the reincarnated Priestess who eventually rediscovers free-will and runs away with Sparrowhawk. I was having a hard time with it until Sparrowhawk shows up. The Priestess on her own is way too passive and drifty until then (a common issue I have with Le Guin's work). Even after the Wizard is there, there's a crucial period of dilemma and decision for the Priestess that had me hooked, and then we're back to another drifty sequence on the journey home.
Le Guin is great at quiet moments. I liked Nikki's summary. A lot of the story is about getting into the Priestess' headspace so we can fully appreciate that moment of clarity, but the payoff just didn't seem worth the effort for me. It's like climbing a hill to see the view and seeing more hills and trees and thinking "yeah, it's nice, but I've seen prettier paintings that didn't make my legs hurt." Kudos to all those who love the Earthsea series. I will read the next couple of books since I already have them in an omnibus, but unless the next two have a big change in style, don't expect to see me among the converts!
After this I read: Skin Game
As we continue with the second book of the series, this time we turn our rotation to Atuan. And we find ourselves within the story of Tenar.
Tenar is'selected' because she was born at the very hour when the sole priestess of the Atuan tombs died. It is believed that the sole priestess is reborn within her. And thus, she is torn away from her family and taken to the Atuan tombs to be raised as the sole priestess.
The book progressed slowly up to a certain point. Because for a long time, we read about the hardships of Tenar's growth, that is, Arha's growth in Atuan, her preparation for priesthood, and her attempts to find out who she is. The story really came to life in terms of events when Ged, the hero of the first book, entered the story.
With Ged's arrival, Arha, in the darkness, begins to question what she has been serving, following the traditions of the Nameless Ones. Actually, she asks herself who she is. Is she Tenar or Arha? Is there a power within her to follow the light born in the dark labyrinths, or will she continue to be condemned to the darkness and act like the person she thought she was?
Ursula K. Le Guin said it was about growing up for the theme of the first book, and you could feel that strongly while reading the book. For the theme of the Tombs of Atuan, she said it was about gender. I don't think I understood all the symbols in the book at this point. I can only understand, as Ursula also said, that this is shown through Tenar's rebirth, the breaking of her chains, the destruction of the world she lives in, and her attainment of freedom.
Like the first book, I also really liked the second book. I really get a different taste when reading her pen. The ability to reflect such a fantastic world in such a beautiful festival comes from the beauty of Ursula's pen.